Originally by: Commander Thrawn

---

Originally by: methosbhunter

---

Edited by: methosbhunter on 08/09/2006 03:17:22

Originally by: Murukan

---

Originally by: Aeaea

---

Originally by: Butter Dog

---

Edited by: Butter Dog on 07/09/2006 22:11:17

It was certainly interesting.

EST and their allies did not field enough numbers to lock the system down (it has 5 gates after all), which enabled about 50 ISS with several carriers to jump in support of U'K.

At this point the dreads went into hiding, and EST and their allies left their gatecamps. There was a roaming sniper group which would appear from time to time, but as I type no dreads are in action and it would seem that U'K and those who would oppose an outpost in the hands of EST have prevented any large POS from being knocked into reinforced.

No doubt things will get more interesting over the coming days.

---

Aren't you supposed to be neutral?

---

ISS always does what suits them and if it backfires they scream nuetrality

---

I thought the point of interstellar starbase syndicate was to be 100% neutral to everyone and to be 100% unbias about anything that happens in eve between any entity that has no direct reflection on the property of the neutral entity called iss.

are you declareing that iss is no longer the neutral entity that it says it is and that is just like the eib scam that all the people that have invested in iss due to the fact that they stand for these reasons have been decieved, in all honesty iss, i would go back to what you where doing and what you say you do and play no role like your supposed to or i wouldnt doubt it if those that respect you for your neutrality start to call you a threat and start to unwind all that you have worked so hard for.

and i have 1 good question how does the afairs of whats going on against ursha khan have to do with iss so what if est gets a outpost if they do how does that affect iss directly. i can tell ya it doesnt or should it is another question ?

i dont know what to make of iss takeing a side when they are supposed to be neutral. especially sence this isnt a reason to take sides because it aint like all this is a attack on a iss outpost or in a iss soverned system which raises another question..

should it be or am i wrong ?

be neutral like your supposed to be mmmkay

---

quite simple. Iss are neutral between alliance wars. meaning alliance that hold territory ie. ascn, d2, v, bob etc. Establishment are pirates and have shows themselves to be hostile to iss when ever the chance happens. example when iss industrial cross assah into g5. UK on the other hand builds an outpost and allows access to its outpost to all friends and allies. much similar to the way iss runs its outpost. Now tell me again, why would iss allow a hostile pirate organization to take control of an outpost in a strategic location in providence?

They are neutral to non pirates. if you are a pirate expect to be shot at.

---