SaB0TaG3
TYR.
Exodus.
0
   |
Posted - 2014.12.23 17:46:17 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Hi,
we want to know what are your biggest pain points in the corp interface so please post below with some nice examples
- Corp Roles need more granularity and flexibility. Don't bundle multiple actions into titles like accountant, personnel manager, etc... Let people create their own titles and individually set the permissions for each individual action. If you want to create some default titles for noobs, go ahead but don't limit our ability to administrate our corps effectively by reducing or simplifying functionality.
Ex: Accountant shouldn't allow all access to wallet divisions, insure corporation ships, pay bills, view transaction logs, etc...
You should be able to assign just wallet division AND/OR insure corp ships AND/OR pay bills to a title accountant if you so desire.
RL security parallel:
Friend "hey man can i spend $10 of your money?"
You "Sure, here's my wallet, my bank card, my PIN, my car keys and my house keys." Because of course everyone that spends my money should have access to all that too.
- More than 7 hangar divisions. I would love to assign a corp hangar to many members, plus others to be shared. 7 is too small no matter what size your corp is. How about 25 or 50? I don't want to set security at the can level, I want to set it at the hangar level. I can't administrate cans easily. 7 hangars sucks.
- More than 7 wallet divisions. How about being able to create and destroy dynamically? How about up to 100? You need more ISK sinks? Charge us ISK/ month for more wallets. You can't administrate/audit wallets easily with only 7.
- Get rid of permissions for (based at), (headquarters), and (others) in role management, add the functionality to add stations with offices individually. Have an add all button, but list the stations accessible individually. Increase our power to administrate and decrease the complexity of your system. With the current system, people get a big screw you from role management if they want to give people access to 3 or more stations but not all of them.
- If you don't do away with shares entirely, consider adding non-voting shares. This way a CEO can distribute shares to corp members without worrying about consolidation or overthrow. Maybe as CEO I don't want to always make 51% of the money paid out through dividends?
In Summary:
Give us the power and flexibility to administrate our corporations like you would a systems administrator a network. Don't dumb it down. Allowing us to properly assign roles and permissible actions to people at a small enough granularity will make administration easier and decrease complexity compared to the current system of bundled access roles.
Trust is hard to come by in EVE. Cautious CEOs err on the side of caution when it comes to corp assets, and lose out on potential corp activity by not assigning roles. Reckless CEOs assign roles to allow access to corp assets and increase corp involvement, but also corp theft. These shouldn't be the only 2 options, but under the current roles system they are our only choices.
Thanks for listening. |