EVE Search - War on Gankers

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

War on Gankers

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ForTheEmpire2014 Shoot The Messenger 40	Posted - 2014.12.28 19:09:56 - [1] - Quote Sharise Dragonstar wrote: You beat the code by ignoring them. Don't acknowledge there existence, don't interact with them. Hi-sec is big enough to avoid them. If they move to your system just move out, every system has asteroid fields. If everyone ignored them they would not get the publicity nor the tears they are looking for. They are abusing game mechanics to cause as much grief as possible. ^^ This. And stop reading MB while you're at it. Go create your own content, you will be much more satisfied.
ForTheEmpire2014 Shoot The Messenger 41	Posted - 2014.12.29 01:26:52 - [2] - Quote Tasspool Harp wrote: Cannibal Kane wrote: I doubt anything will happen. It has been a while since a corp with members actually tried anything. I am always ready to assist in making them just another story on Minerbumping. Just like all the others. Aww. C'mon man. Give content a chance a chance to flourish at least briefly rather than being so quick to nip it in the bud. Nope. I spent 3hrs in Uedama the other day. This is just some of what you get: n++[ 2014.12.27 03:48:22 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers failed again n++[ 2014.12.27 03:53:17 ] Armin Soprano > antigankers failing and rageing n++[ 2014.12.27 04:00:06 ] Armin Soprano > antigankers failed - again n++[ 2014.12.27 04:01:39 ] Armin Soprano > anti-gankers failed again n++[ 2014.12.27 04:02:18 ] John E Normus > dear white knights, ecm is NOT going to work. please fix yourself n++[ 2014.12.27 04:02:37 ] HC Androidson > what would you suggest we use? n++[ 2014.12.27 04:02:46 ] John E Normus > biomass n++[ 2014.12.27 04:02:49 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers failed again n++[ 2014.12.27 04:02:58 ] Chocolate Mooses > HC Androidson I'd honostly sugesset you not bother or make about 40 friends. n++[ 2014.12.27 04:03:42 ] John E Normus > biomass n++[ 2014.12.27 04:03:46 ] Phryxis > ^^^ n++[ 2014.12.27 04:04:04 ] babocheets > HC Androidson forget about making friends, you would probably have to buy them n++[ 2014.12.27 04:04:11 ] babocheets > considering how futile ur efforts are n++[ 2014.12.27 04:04:11 ] HC Androidson > ouch n++[ 2014.12.27 04:08:17 ] Armin Soprano > hahahaha run away fail anti-gankers n++[ 2014.12.27 04:14:01 ] Armin Soprano > i love seeing anti-gankers fail - again n++[ 2014.12.27 04:15:58 ] Armin Soprano > antigankers - failing again n++[ 2014.12.27 04:16:23 ] Armin Soprano > another day of failure from the anti-gankers n++[ 2014.12.27 04:18:32 ] Chocolate Mooses > anti-ganking fails again n++[ 2014.12.27 04:18:47 ] loyalanon > anti-ganking fails again n++[ 2014.12.27 04:20:16 ] loyalanon > antigankers failing again [ 2014.12.27 04:23:00 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers failing again n++[ 2014.12.27 04:23:21 ] xxBLACK SKULLxx 929 > gf n++[ 2014.12.27 04:23:25 ] Chocolate Mooses > gf n++[ 2014.12.27 04:23:59 ] loyalanon > antigankers failing again n++[ 2014.12.27 04:24:56 ] Armin Soprano > anti-gankers keep failing n++[ 2014.12.27 04:26:31 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers keep failing n++[ 2014.12.27 04:40:55 ] Armin Soprano > anti-gankers failed again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:10:31 ] Armin Soprano > anti-gankers failed - again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:12:54 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers failed again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:12:58 ] loyalanon > thanks for coming out and failing - again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:17:04 ] Armin Soprano > another day of anti-ganking failure n++[ 2014.12.27 05:18:26 ] Armin Soprano > antigankers failed - again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:19:20 ] Armin Soprano > HAHAHAHAAH n++[ 2014.12.27 05:19:28 ] Armin Soprano > antigaknkers failed - again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:19:46 ] Armin Soprano > HAHAAHAHA ANTI-GANKERS FAILED AGIAN n++[ 2014.12.27 05:20:10 ] Armin Soprano > ANTIGANKERS FAILED TO SAVE HIM n++[ 2014.12.27 05:20:16 ] Armin Soprano > HAHAHAHAHAHAHA n++[ 2014.12.27 05:20:19 ] Armin Soprano > ANOTHER DAY OF FAILURE n++[ 2014.12.27 05:20:58 ] Armin Soprano > ANTIGANKERS FAIL AGAIN n++[ 2014.12.27 05:21:23 ] Armin Soprano > ANTIGANKERS FAILED - AGAIN lol n++[ 2014.12.27 05:22:25 ] Armin Soprano > interesting that you failed to save another freighter - again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:22:31 ] Armin Soprano > he should have bought a mining permit n++[ 2014.12.27 05:22:42 ] Armin Soprano > antigankers failed - again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:23:41 ] Armin Soprano > antigankers failed - again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:23:58 ] Armin Soprano > ANTIGANKERS FAILED AGAIN n++[ 2014.12.27 05:25:16 ] Armin Soprano > another day of failure for the anti-gankers n++[ 2014.12.27 05:26:18 ] ForTheEmpire2014 > stop spammin armin...pls n++[ 2014.12.27 05:26:26 ] Armin Soprano > ForTheEmpire2014 cry harder please n++[ 2014.12.27 05:26:30 ] Armin Soprano > anti-gankers failed again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:26:54 ] Armin Soprano > anti-gankers failed AGAIN n++[ 2014.12.27 05:27:48 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers FAILED again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:33:18 ] Armin Soprano > anti-gankers failed AGAIN n++[ 2014.12.27 05:35:54 ] Armin Soprano > anti-gankers failed again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:37:59 ] loyalanon > we gank empty freighters n++[ 2014.12.27 05:38:02 ] loyalanon > loot is nothing n++[ 2014.12.27 05:38:13 ] Chocolate Mooses > loot is for plebs who even check their wallets n++[ 2014.12.27 05:38:18 ] Chocolate Mooses > we have infinate ISK n++[ 2014.12.27 05:38:32 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers keep failing n++[ 2014.12.27 05:47:17 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers failed again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:47:26 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers failed again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:47:55 ] loyalanon > antigankers keep failing n++[ 2014.12.27 05:49:50 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers failed hard n++[ 2014.12.27 05:50:34 ] loyalanon > miners die and antigankers cry and the code(and cfc) just keep on winning n++[ 2014.12.27 05:50:40 ] loyalanon > id like to thank our goon overlords for making this all possible n++[ 2014.12.27 05:54:23 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers fail again n++[ 2014.12.27 05:57:57 ] loyalanon > anti-gankers failed - again
ForTheEmpire2014 Shoot The Messenger 41	Posted - 2014.12.29 01:34:19 - [3] - Quote Don't even bother. It's not worth it. Go make your own content, instead of being loyalanon's punching bag. If CODE. wants to be treated with anything other than hostility, then ditch your ceo. You are all tainted by it (Kaarous logic is correct). You have lost your way ppl. Tora is 100% on the mark.
ForTheEmpire2014 Shoot The Messenger 41	Posted - 2014.12.29 01:49:40 - [4] - Quote Leto Thule wrote: Wow. If that's unaltered, its a bit much. Local spam is trash. Actually, that was edited. Believe it or not there was even more, as others pipe in too. This happens all too often, though.
ForTheEmpire2014 Shoot The Messenger 41	Posted - 2014.12.29 01:55:15 - [5] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: ForTheEmpire2014 wrote: Don't even bother. It's not worth it. Go make your own content, instead of being loyalanon's punching bag. If CODE. wants to be treated with anything other than hostility, then ditch your ceo. You are all tainted by it (Kaarous logic is correct). You have lost your way ppl. Tora is 100% on the mark. Why would they not want hostility? They literally beg for people to fight them, it's fun. Nevermind that, if you judge people by their enemies, then CODE is definitely doing something right. If carebears hate you, then you're probably on the right track. Sounds like fun...wtf?
ForTheEmpire2014 Shoot The Messenger 44	Posted - 2014.12.29 05:51:06 - [6] - Quote ggodhsup wrote: veers......this thread and your avatar need to be locked. enjoy. Despite your obvious attempts to derail the thread and have it locked, I have faith the good ISD's will clean this up and allow it for a time longer. The OP is about the psychological war factor of CODE., and intentionally derailing threads that are not complementary is part and parcel of that. Knock it off? I spent another evening in Uedama, and stayed tuned into AG chats as well. I did not see the "toxic" chat that is alluded to, and I am happy that ppl (yes you) in Uedama kept the spamming down to a somewhat reasonable level. Moar content is good for everyone, just keep on keeping it in game.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.