| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
1906
   |
Posted - 2015.01.05 19:38:45 -
[1] - Quote
poor caldari, dead before they finish lock |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
1906
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 07:48:54 -
[2] - Quote
you would think with all the super-resignations from pheobe and this thread their prices would have gone down more. Its a shame really. I wanted a Hel. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
1906
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 01:25:52 -
[3] - Quote
Alexis Nightwish wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The primary goal of this change is to ensure that rapidly scooping and relaunching fighters and fighter bombers never gives a dps advantage. So instead of, you know, preventing the rapid scooping and relaunching of fighters and fighter bombers by either adding a cooldown to such actions or by tracking drones' cycle time while in the drone bay, you change the scan resolution? I can only see three possibilities here. Laziness, incompetence, or deception.
Waiter there's a fly in my soup.
"Don't worry, I'll handle this"
*swings sledgehammer* |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
1907
|
Posted - 2015.01.07 03:36:14 -
[4] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:Rowells wrote:Alexis Nightwish wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The primary goal of this change is to ensure that rapidly scooping and relaunching fighters and fighter bombers never gives a dps advantage. So instead of, you know, preventing the rapid scooping and relaunching of fighters and fighter bombers by either adding a cooldown to such actions or by tracking drones' cycle time while in the drone bay, you change the scan resolution? I can only see three possibilities here. Laziness, incompetence, or deception. Waiter there's a fly in my soup. "Don't worry, I'll handle this" *swings sledgehammer* confirming that having to wait a few extra seconds before damage is applied is both literally worthy of a national socialist party comparison and considered a sledgehammer
I'm responding to the counter-proposal. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
1908
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 19:16:56 -
[5] - Quote
DaeHan Minhyok wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:DaeHan Minhyok wrote:The scan res changes decrease the drones ability to deal damage to smaller targets without changing the ability to defend against them, thus increasing the risk. no it doesn't the drones do the same damage as before they just don't start doing damage until a small period of time has passed Pretty sure scan res also effects tracking?
nope. only lock time. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
1936
|
Posted - 2015.01.25 02:45:31 -
[6] - Quote
Solaris Vex wrote:Fighters are pretty easy to counter already, just broadcast for reps.
Or outrun them they only move at 2500m/s.
Or shoot them, they're sig radius is 400m, for comparison a sabre with MWD is only 300m.
In the battle against PL last December we (HERO Coalition) destroyed fighters so rapidly that PL stopped launching them. If fighters generated killmails our isk efficiency would have been through the roof.
But nothing will stop people from complaining if they can't solo a carrier with their vagabond.
People aren't whining that fighters are bad (at least not over all) the complaint is that you don't have to really risk the carrier deploying them. I'm gonna bet that PL didn't have all those carriers circling the shields of a POS while random frigs were on the field being assisted. |
| |
|