| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
1318
   |
Posted - 2015.03.14 05:22:54 -
[91] - Quote
CCP Darwin wrote:Kinza wrote:Art team putting polls on designs and calling for general design ideas from the player base would be awesome A program of polling and asking for player submissions is unlikely, however the art team does see feedback posted in Features & Ideas, so please feel welcome to post there. As for other ways to get your feedback heard, we are planning to have a round table session at Fanfest that will provide an opportunity for player feedback. Also, CSM members often pass along art feedback, so you can consider contacting one of the CSM representatives.
CCP Darwin and Kinza I need to correct you on something.
CCP Did hold a contest a few years ago on Deviant art for Ship designs to be put into eve online. Deviant Art Link.
There is no shortage of ideas for ships and designs out there. In fact all the Tier 3 battle cruisers came from that contest.
Even though the contest is still over, I believe that CCP still has the right to buy any of the designs submitted to the contest pending some negotiation with the owner and Deviant Art.
EDIT : link starts on page 145 or design 145 I'm not sure which.
Why Can't I have a picture signature.
Also please support graphical immersion, bring back the art that brought people to EvE online originaly.
|
Claud Tiberius
Fidelas Constans
102
|
Posted - 2015.03.14 08:27:34 -
[92] - Quote
New Chimera looks good. Glad to see the tech/efficiency ship design - as seen on the blackbird, becoming more common with the fleet.
Once upon a time the Golem had a Raven hull and it looked good. Then it transformed into a plataduck. The end.
|
Arthur Aihaken
X A X
4129
|
Posted - 2015.03.14 18:28:38 -
[93] - Quote
Bandalon Ominus wrote:please dont ruin the wyvern, its fine, might even wanna go ot the old red moon rising, but would hate it if it was changed to the new chimera design concept style..
The Wyvern is probably the one capital ship in most dire need of a redesign.
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
700
|
Posted - 2015.03.14 18:41:13 -
[94] - Quote
Agree, dont touch the chimera. New design looks ugly. If you are going to retouch the model, copy the existing one, its fantastic. |
Lloyd Roses
906
|
Posted - 2015.03.14 19:20:23 -
[95] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:[...] waiiiit a second. Has there been a commitment to give distinct models to T2 ships, from their base hulls?
Fairly certain the eagle/onyx and rook/falcon are most recent proof of the direction they're heading. Each case, both look very similar to the base T1 hull, but they got significant character added over some variations (Eagle's neck, Onyx' missile mounts on the wings, Rook and Falcon having quite different (supposed to be bridge+ewar-battery?)
When the new Blackbird was first introduced, those minor variations struck me as very neat first steps in that direction.
I GÖÑ Sleipnir
|
Niobe Song
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2015.03.14 20:03:46 -
[96] - Quote
They have also mentioned in the dev blogs (or maybe it was patch notes) after the Incursus and Exequror were redesigned that in a future patch their T2 or Navy variants would get updates as well to differentiate them.
And for the guy a few posts up that things the Wyvern is the capital ship most in need of an update....whaaaat?
Have you never seen the Aeon, Archon or Ragnarok? The Wyvern is awesome. |
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
1320
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 03:57:02 -
[97] - Quote
Niobe Song wrote:They have also mentioned in the dev blogs (or maybe it was patch notes) after the Incursus and Exequror were redesigned that in a future patch their T2 or Navy variants would get updates as well to differentiate them.
And for the guy a few posts up that things the Wyvern is the capital ship most in need of an update....whaaaat?
Have you never seen the Aeon, Archon or Ragnarok? The Wyvern is awesome.
Rag is awesome, it is the king of rust buckets! How can CCP improve on it add more rust?
Why Can't I have a picture signature.
Also please support graphical immersion, bring back the art that brought people to EvE online originaly.
|
Niobe Song
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2015.03.15 20:14:45 -
[98] - Quote
It looks like you gave a 3 year old a stack of Lego blocks and asked them to build a space ship. And they just started stacking blocks without rhyme or reason.
There is no there there. |
Altirius Saldiaro
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
320
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 01:07:59 -
[99] - Quote
d0cTeR9 wrote:http://i.imgur.com/JLbtTT4.png
I like the current Chimera far more than that tin can looking design. Oh well, if thats why CCP is going for, there's no stopping them.
I just hope it doesnt have the screwed up camera view that the Falcon, Blackbird and Rook has. CCP still hasn't fixed that screw up. |
Koebmand
Silverflames
32
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 02:25:23 -
[100] - Quote
Why not make more ships instead of destroying old to create new looks? |
|
|
Rawketsled
Generic Corp Name
104
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 02:37:57 -
[101] - Quote
The new Chimera is too square. There's too many perfectly horizontal sections and too many perfectly vertical sections. The old/current model has a nice balance of flat and angled parts to it.
Koebmand wrote:Why not make more ships instead of destroying old to create new looks?
New ships need new roles.
There's only so many roles possible in a game.
It's why the Bowhead does something no other ship does. It's why the D3s do something no other ship does - even then people are upset that the new ships are making AFs redundant.
More ships for the sake of more ships is bad for the game.
So what is CCP going to do with their art department? If they're not making new models for new ships, then they're redundant and should be fired. But that'll mean there'll never be any new models - which is also bad for the game. CCP needs to have an art team that is constantly improving the game. This is why they're making the existing game look better.
|
Lucretia DeWinter
Dirt Nap Squad
Dirt Nap Squad.
206
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 08:45:37 -
[102] - Quote
CCP Darwin wrote:Sniper Smith wrote:Every time it was mentioned by a player (Or even CSM in the minutes) it wasn't addressed. As you know from the minutes, I was in the room for the CSM session. It was clearly stated in the room that the Dominix is still on our list of upcoming redesigns and had been omitted from the presentation slide by mistake. (In fact, it was added to the slide in real time as it was brought up!) The notes meant to make clear that it's still coming, but unfortunately the wording may have left it more ambiguous than we intended at the time. Quote:Also, I agree, lock you guys in with beer.. more beer will be provided as more work is done :D
It's on.
This is going to negatively impact the TTP ratio.
Designing and drawing > Beer > Drawing > Beer > Photocopying Body Parts > Beer > Vomit > Beer> Lewd Behaviour > Beer> Rimmugygur
http://images.gameskinny.com/gameskinny/80f6d3b2cd721c7dcae1a94fc6e05187.jpg |
Komodo Askold
No Code of Conduct
Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
326
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 10:38:02 -
[103] - Quote
Personally, I'm in for tweaking old designs with new rendering techniques and textures to make them look new and refreshed. Just look at the Typhoon or Stabber, for example. On the other hand, the new Blackbird and friends don't look that horrible in my opinion.
About the Chimera, I like its current shape, but I agree it could use some more detail, in the sense I mentioned above. I also agree it could be a bit bigger.
And about that supposedly concept art from the Art of EVE, for me it reminds me more about a possible Caldari Tactical Destroyer design.
EDIT: and about the Wyvern, please do keep its current shape! In my opinion it looks amazing. Maybe it could use more complex geometries on the prow side panels (which currently are flat panels).
Also, I agree capital ships could use some more details in their textures. Right now, if you zoom in on them they lose detail as quickly as frigates. On the other hand, that could require really big textures... But weren't there a request for a super-high quality textures pack? |
Wylde Kardde
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 13:26:05 -
[104] - Quote
OP here you go.. On the left
http://cdn1.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/67006/1/6.jpg
Not too bad.. And still has a bay opening on top
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z61bKT-m0UE
|
Janeway84
Def Squadron
Pride Before Fall
149
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 14:06:22 -
[105] - Quote
CCP should give drone bays back to dreads , only change im requesting  |
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
1842
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 14:51:37 -
[106] - Quote
izznot terrible, cant tell much though until i see an ingame render as to what it will eventually look like (which is unfortuneately also when changing it back or to another model becomes a "non-option")
but it at least isnt a tragedy. |
Murkar Omaristos
The Alabaster Albatross
Eternal Pretorian Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 17:50:09 -
[107] - Quote
Didn't bother reading 3 pages of posts before this but.....IMO all of the ships need to be touched up, including the Chimera. The model is fine but the textures need work. Even so - most of the new ship models look amazing, I certainly wouldn't say no to a new Chimera (although the attention and time would be better spent on ships that peopel commonly complain about being ugly).
Since the introduction of PBR it makes sense to have as many ships touched up as possible though because it makes the outdated textures on everything but Amarr ships look pretty bad. |
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
1321
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 18:11:13 -
[108] - Quote
I wonder if they are redoing all the models so we can all 3-d print them with ease or buy 3-d print models for plex and aurum.
Why Can't I have a picture signature.
Also please support graphical immersion, bring back the art that brought people to EvE online originaly.
|
Leisha Miranen
The Alabaster Albatross
Eternal Pretorian Alliance
5
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 18:35:25 -
[109] - Quote
would definitely buy a stratios model..... |
Wylde Kardde
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 18:38:17 -
[110] - Quote
There still should be a reasonable priority list constructed from player feedback.. Cough!! Aeon..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z61bKT-m0UE
|
|
|
Iroquoiss Pliskin
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
19
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 18:41:08 -
[111] - Quote
Janeway84 wrote:CCP should give drone bays back to dreads , only change im requesting
But that is... Improssibru ( -á-¦ -ƒ-û -í-¦) |
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
1843
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 19:49:31 -
[112] - Quote
Murkar Omaristos wrote:Didn't bother reading 3 pages of posts before this but.....IMO all of the ships need to be touched up, including the Chimera. The model is fine but the textures need work. Even so - most of the new ship models look amazing, I certainly wouldn't say no to a new Chimera (although the attention and time would be better spent on ships that peopel commonly complain about being ugly).
Since the introduction of PBR it makes sense to have as many ships touched up as possible though because it makes the outdated textures on everything but Amarr ships look pretty bad.
was never against touchups, just a complete redesign into something the chimera is not, like imagine if they decided to turn the archon into a sphere, it just wouldnt be right, because an archon isnt a square. |
Leisha Miranen
The Alabaster Albatross
Eternal Pretorian Alliance
5
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 23:36:29 -
[113] - Quote
Thoughts on the matter, displayed in meme form. |
Poultergoose4
Mind Games.
Suddenly Spaceships.
49
|
Posted - 2015.03.17 16:54:45 -
[114] - Quote
No no no no no no no no no no no... Stay away from the Chimera!!!!! |
Ciel993
Vision Partners
End of Natural Lifetime
3
|
Posted - 2015.03.17 17:22:08 -
[115] - Quote
to be honest that looks pretty good. also it seems like CCP is altering the whole character of caldari ship design to make it more modern, so no more lego blocks, instead we are getting more streamlined, high-tech looking ships like in most of modern sci-fi settings.
I for one, do like these changes. It reflect caldari's high-tech shield ship concept better than the old blocky designs, and I'm pretty sure every caldari ship change afterward would go for this direction. |
Ciel993
Vision Partners
End of Natural Lifetime
3
|
Posted - 2015.03.17 17:25:33 -
[116] - Quote
double post, sorry |
Arthur Aihaken
Narada
4131
|
Posted - 2015.03.17 18:42:12 -
[117] - Quote
Apparently the schematic indicates "point defense". Does this mean carriers are finally going to get turrets or launchers for defense?
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|
Dallas Black
Sebiestor Heavy Industries
Flaming Nebula
0
|
Posted - 2015.03.17 23:48:50 -
[118] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Apparently the schematic indicates "point defense". Does this mean carriers are finally going to get turrets or launchers for defense?
Battlestar Chimera? :P |
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
1849
|
Posted - 2015.03.18 13:56:11 -
[119] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Apparently the schematic indicates "point defense". Does this mean carriers are finally going to get turrets or launchers for defense?
if they do, theyll likely also nerf their HP, reduce their ability to field fighters (or reduce fighters ability to engage subcaps) or something else to ultra nerf them, as well as the nerf of needing highslot weapons to use the point-defense, all so they can "fairly" be engaged by subcaps in 1v1 fights, by which I mean lose to the ishtar |
Parthannun Solette
Prime Forces
The Methodical Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2015.03.21 15:21:16 -
[120] - Quote
i love the current look off the chimera i would hate to see it change to an big version of an blackbird module |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |