EVE Search - Ship HP increases, defensive combat, and the nerf to blaster ships...

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Ship HP increases, defensive combat, and the nerf to blaster ships...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
webkert Amarr Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.09.27 19:03:00 - [1] There is nothing wrong with the blastermega. All closerange pvp bs will have to use injectors to keep an active tank running. Obviously the mega will have to use an mwd to get close to do damage, but on the other hand an acpest or pulseapoc will have to use an mwd to keep its range to a blastermega. There is nothing wrong with the thorax either. There are crusiers that are much worse off, maller and omen for example.
webkert Amarr Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.09.27 21:32:00 - [2] Originally by: Nybbas Originally by: Stephar Originally by: Nybbas actually a maller has 100 more cap than a thorax, does not have to fit a mwd (pulses have a MUCH MUCH longer range than blasters so dont give us that crap about range) and a maller, and other amarr ships... like the apoc, get a bonus to cap use on their lasers that actually bring cap use on lasers down to, or at the same level as blasters. Thanks but you are wrong. OK, so a Maller starts off with 100 more cap. It's like having a free cap 100 charge in the hold... or an extra 5m3 in the cargo bay. The Thorax and Maller still have the same cap regen rates. As for laser and hybrid cap use, before skills... Tachyon II = 7.60 cap/sec Mega Beam II = 7.22 cap/sec Mega Pulse II = 5.08 cap/sec 425 Railgun II = 3.14 cap/sec 350 Railgun II = 3.01 cap/sec Neutron Blaster Cannon II = 2.31 cap/sec Assuming the Amarrian pilot has trained all spaceship command skills to level V... Tachyon II = 3.80 cap/sec Mega Beam II = 3.61 cap/sec 425 Railgun II = 3.14 cap/sec 350 Railgun II = 3.01 cap/sec Mega Pulse II = 2.54 cap/sec Neutron Blaster II = 2.31 cap/sec BTW - These are in-game figures. The stats you'll see in the "ships and modules" section on the website are inaccurate and don't reflect the changes in the most recent blaster buff patch. yes, now compile with the an apocs already higher cap amount over a megathron, and the .3 cap per second that these weapon systems use becomes a non issue. Thanks for proving my point. And how many amarr ships fit mwds? give me a break. the gallente ships that fit them not only get a reduction to their max capacitor BUT THEY ALSO keep the same cap recharge meaning their cap recharges at a slower rate anyways. A blaster ship HAS NO CHOICE but to fit a mwd unless it wants to die miserable, a ship using pulses would be fine without one, and they normally don't fit them. Then I guess you don't fly amarr ships, I do and I use mwds on all my pulse ships. The reason the apoc has more cap is because of a bonus, would you rather have that instead of the damage bonus the thron has? well I'm sure you dont becuase its crap.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.