EVE Search - Cicadian Seekers protection act

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Cicadian Seekers protection act

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Angel Bram Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 1	Posted - 2015.02.07 21:15:41 - [1] - Quote Proposing the legal protection of Cicadian Seekers in Matar space. Unlike the Amarr, the seekers should have at least a minimum of rights while in Matar space. I do understand it is unlikely that full protections would be extended and enforced by Concord, however I would at least like to defend them without Concord's interference while they themselves have been acting within Concord and Matar law within Matar space. For this a suspect tag would be enough. So, you attack a Cicadian Seeker while in Matar space, I would like to attack you and not have Concord save your sorry ass. Thank You
Iain Cariaba 1036	Posted - 2015.02.07 21:26:02 - [2] - Quote Um, dude... do you even know what sleepers are and their backstory? Going by your suggestion here, I'm guessing no. You suggesting protection for what is essentially highly advanced drones, not actual people. EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid. "This reminds me - I must complain to my local butcher about him not catering to vegitarians." - admiral root responding to someone whining about too much PvP in Eve Online.
Lugh Crow-Slave 681	Posted - 2015.02.07 21:26:38 - [3] - Quote lol Lore wise if they are working for "The Other" your better off getting this passed in amarr space Iain Cariaba wrote: Um, dude... do you even know what sleepers are and their backstory? Going by your suggestion here, I'm guessing no. You suggesting protection for what is essentially highly advanced drones, not actual people. + this not to mention potentially much much dangerous than rogue drones once they decide to free fire one anything the see they pod ppl FFS Fuel block colors
Angel Bram Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 1	Posted - 2015.02.07 21:39:10 - [4] - Quote Iain Cariaba wrote: Um, dude... do you even know what sleepers are and their backstory? Going by your suggestion here, I'm guessing no. You suggesting protection for what is essentially highly advanced drones, not actual people. Even Amarr might be welcome in Matar space if they could only behave. So yes, even if just a machine, if it obeys the law while in our space it should be unmolested.
Ralph King-Griffin Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance 8785	Posted - 2015.02.07 21:49:40 - [5] - Quote You never go full roleplay "I'm also quite confident that you are laughing and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers." =]I[=
Iain Cariaba 1036	Posted - 2015.02.07 21:53:15 - [6] - Quote Angel Bram wrote: Iain Cariaba wrote: Um, dude... do you even know what sleepers are and their backstory? Going by your suggestion here, I'm guessing no. You suggesting protection for what is essentially highly advanced drones, not actual people. Even Amarr might be welcome in Matar space if they could only behave. So yes, even if just a machine, if it obeys the law while in our space it should be unmolested. Go into any wormhole, warp to one of the anomalies there, and see what those seekers are a prelude to. EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid. "This reminds me - I must complain to my local butcher about him not catering to vegitarians." - admiral root responding to someone whining about too much PvP in Eve Online.
Angel Bram Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 1	Posted - 2015.02.07 22:03:16 - [7] - Quote I don't have to go to WH space to get attacked. I can just fly too close to most any POS in high sec. Get to close to someone else's base... pretty straight forward. To me, since these machines appear to be obeying the law, what I am most objecting too is the protection to those that attack them. A suspect tag is enough.
Rajeet Achmar Calibrated Chaos Dead Terrorists 71	Posted - 2015.02.07 22:06:44 - [8] - Quote Sleepers are not drones, they control drones, but they themselves are not drones. They are called sleepers because they choose to live in a VR world.
Lugh Crow-Slave 682	Posted - 2015.02.07 22:07:22 - [9] - Quote Angel Bram wrote: I don't have to go to WH space to get attacked. I can just fly too close to most any POS in high sec. Get to close to someone else's base... pretty straight forward. To me, since these machines appear to be obeying the law, what I am most objecting too is the protection to those that attack them. A suspect tag is enough. but since they are nonhuman they are not protected by the law Fuel block colors
Angel Bram Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 1	Posted - 2015.02.07 22:20:32 - [10] - Quote This would extend the same rights to a machine as any wreck or shipping container. I would like the opportunity to use my guns to object to their treatment. You will have all rights to return fire as always.
Iain Cariaba 1036	Posted - 2015.02.07 22:24:35 - [11] - Quote Angel Bram wrote: This would extend the same rights to a machine as any wreck or shipping container. I would like the opportunity to use my guns to object to their treatment. You will have all rights to return fire as always. Find out who is doing something you don't like, leave NPC corp, wardec those being naughty in your opinion, shoot them without having to worry about concord. Tools already exist for what you want, suggest you use them. EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid. "This reminds me - I must complain to my local butcher about him not catering to vegitarians." - admiral root responding to someone whining about too much PvP in Eve Online.
Lugh Crow-Slave 682	Posted - 2015.02.07 22:26:13 - [12] - Quote Angel Bram wrote: This would extend the same rights to a machine as any wreck or shipping container. those things don't pose a threat to new Eden Fuel block colors
Angel Bram Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 1	Posted - 2015.02.07 22:55:43 - [13] - Quote Most everything is a threat, space is a very dangerous place. Yet, so far these machines have obeyed the law. Since wardecking is very impractical, maybe logi support would be a place to start. Likely I would draw the suspect tag, but if I were engaged I could return fire. See if that works... If not, maybe just assemble lots of destroyers and gank. Fees like most everyone here seems ok with that.
Lugh Crow-Slave 682	Posted - 2015.02.07 23:01:46 - [14] - Quote Angel Bram wrote: Most everything is a threat, space is a very dangerous place. Yet, so far these machines have obeyed the law. Since wardecking is very impractical, maybe logi support would be a place to start. Likely I would draw the suspect tag, but if I were engaged I could return fire. See if that works... If not, maybe just assemble lots of destroyers and gank. Fees like most everyone here seems ok with that. you can not use remote rep on a hostile NPC (idk if you can use it on any npc) Fuel block colors
Petrified TOG - The Older Gamers TOG - The Older Gamers Alliance 213	Posted - 2015.02.08 00:05:04 - [15] - Quote hehe... I can just imagine the "drones are people too" arguments.
Petrified TOG - The Older Gamers TOG - The Older Gamers Alliance 213	Posted - 2015.02.08 00:05:50 - [16] - Quote Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Angel Bram wrote: Most everything is a threat, space is a very dangerous place. Yet, so far these machines have obeyed the law. Since wardecking is very impractical, maybe logi support would be a place to start. Likely I would draw the suspect tag, but if I were engaged I could return fire. See if that works... If not, maybe just assemble lots of destroyers and gank. Fees like most everyone here seems ok with that. you can not use remote rep on a hostile NPC (idk if you can use it on any npc) You can remote rep a hostile NPC. Just look for CONCORD to pop you when you do, however.
Lugh Crow-Slave 686	Posted - 2015.02.08 00:49:43 - [17] - Quote Petrified wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Angel Bram wrote: Most everything is a threat, space is a very dangerous place. Yet, so far these machines have obeyed the law. Since wardecking is very impractical, maybe logi support would be a place to start. Likely I would draw the suspect tag, but if I were engaged I could return fire. See if that works... If not, maybe just assemble lots of destroyers and gank. Fees like most everyone here seems ok with that. you can not use remote rep on a hostile NPC (idk if you can use it on any npc) You can remote rep a hostile NPC. Just look for CONCORD to pop you when you do, however. just went out and tried again safety off and everything RR captrans remote sebos none of them will activate Fuel block colors
Alena McJenkins Reluctant Warriors Disorganized Outcasts 7	Posted - 2015.02.08 00:53:01 - [18] - Quote What? No. That's silly. This signature apparently cannot be scanned.
Petrified TOG - The Older Gamers TOG - The Older Gamers Alliance 214	Posted - 2015.02.08 04:55:32 - [19] - Quote Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Petrified wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Angel Bram wrote: Most everything is a threat, space is a very dangerous place. Yet, so far these machines have obeyed the law. Since wardecking is very impractical, maybe logi support would be a place to start. Likely I would draw the suspect tag, but if I were engaged I could return fire. See if that works... If not, maybe just assemble lots of destroyers and gank. Fees like most everyone here seems ok with that. you can not use remote rep on a hostile NPC (idk if you can use it on any npc) You can remote rep a hostile NPC. Just look for CONCORD to pop you when you do, however. just went out and tried again safety off and everything RR captrans remote sebos none of them will activate Interesting. Wonder if that is true for NPC rats as well... years ago I lost a Hulk because instead of launching hobs against the rats in the belt I accidentally launched armor repair drones. CONCORD didn't like that and blew up my Hulk. Maybe they changed the code for this along the way?
Angel Bram Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 2	Posted - 2015.02.13 21:56:44 - [20] - Quote Sorry, took a while to test using remote repair. Things are shy and tend to warp off when you get close. Remote repair will not actuate and you get a pop-up stating interferance being the problem. So. I still desire the suspect tag for attacking Seekers and it seems fair to put a suspect tag for repairing also the ability to remote repair Seekers should be added. Again, I am only proposing this for Matar space.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.