| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ryan Farmern
Rhongomiant Legion Industries
The Explicit Alliance
10
   |
Posted - 2015.02.25 04:22:08 -
[1] - Quote
Hello I'm Ryan Farmern, the correct person for you to vote for in CSM X.
I'm not much for running a campaign, but I am running this year because I feel CCP has made too many big changes too fast.
I think we need to look at fixing some of the game mechanics:
- need more useful deployables
- Wormholes need Ice belts, possibly not the exact same.
- Ice belts need to be an ihub upgrade, not a lucky geo location
- better ewar balance
- reevaluate T2 production,
- CCP to actually ask the community about big changes
- Capital Mining ships (More risk for more ISK, comparable to what a ratting toon can make/hour)
- Dock-able capitals in High Sec
- Better interface for Corp roles
- Same thing for POS roles, anchoring, timers
- PI Overhaul
- Reevaluate multiboxing policy to be strict on combat and not on industry
- Cloaking ships need bubble nullified, but for cloaking devices to use fuel of isos or LO, also add a fuel bay and skill that effects fuel consumption.
- New players need better tutorials, and something pointing them to verified new player corps other than EveU.
I could sit here for hours thinking of changes/balances I think Eve needs. Couldn't we all?
Vote for Ryan Farmern. The CSM everyone needs to fix Eve, not just one area of space. |
EaTCarbS
Demiurge Conglomerate
5
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 05:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
this makes me moist |
Eve Atlus
Eve Atlus Tools
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 07:05:10 -
[3] - Quote
I support most of these changes, good luck, you have my vote. |
ShadowandLight
Trigger Happy Capsuleers
Soviet-Union
347
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 07:21:21 -
[4] - Quote
Hi Ryan
I've been told you are supportive of Multiboxing
Could you respond either privately or publicly (your choice) to these questions?
http://pastebin.com/yubTB4sR
EVE Online and Multiboxing
Legacy of a Capsuleer Podcast
|
Ryan Farmern
Rhongomiant Legion Industries
The Explicit Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 13:21:51 -
[5] - Quote
ShadowandLight wrote:Hi Ryan I've been told you are supportive of Multiboxing Could you respond either privately or publicly (your choice) to these questions? http://pastebin.com/yubTB4sR
Yes I do support multiboxing.
However, the broken part of multiboxing is overuse of combat.
If you want a mining fleet, you should be able to jetcan, assist drones, dock/undock without worrying about a ban.
But doing bombing runs (or any other pvp) or breaking the economy running incursions should be not allowed when using IS Boxer, everything else I think is fine. |
Alan Mathison
EVE University
Ivy League
51
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 19:51:36 -
[6] - Quote
Ryan:
Don't you realize that using multiboxing for a mining fleet is breaking the economy as much, if not more, than running incursions?
What is the difference between using multiboxing to run incursions and using multiboxing to run mining fleets?
--
Alan Mathison, Proud Sophmore, EVE University
The YC117 CSM Election. VOTE! "Or I don't even wanna know you."
CSM-X Candidates List: Sugar Kyle, Jane Ting, Mike Azariah, Ashterothi, Steve Ronukan, Xander Phoena, Chance Ravinne, Dave Korhal.
|
Ryan Farmern
Rhongomiant Legion Industries
The Explicit Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 19:57:42 -
[7] - Quote
Alan Mathison wrote:Ryan:
Don't you realize that using multiboxing for a mining fleet is breaking the economy as much, if not more, than running incursions?
What is the difference between using multiboxing to run incursions and using multiboxing to run mining fleets?
The difference is that the mining fleet will still be able to mine with or without broadcasting, just makes it easier to be able to jetcan and move around with broadcasting.
However, it is nearly impossible to run an incursion fleet without IS Boxer and the features it comes with.
Also, the incursion boxers can bring in 1b/hour or more, whereas the miners can only bring in 1/4th that with the same plex responsibilities.
Let's not get hung up over one point though. There's plenty more to Eve. |
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
986
|
Posted - 2015.02.27 03:44:43 -
[8] - Quote
Ryan Farmern wrote:However, it is nearly impossible to run an incursion fleet without IS Boxer and the features it comes with. Strangely enough, people manage to do Incursions with other players.
How do you propose to bring about all those changes you list in your original post?
CSM Ten movement for change.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
Status: Rabid carebear
Blog
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |