| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
23457
   |
Posted - 2015.02.26 14:47:50 -
[1] - Quote
If you want aggressors to pick up Criminal flag, then you should be a miner. Sounds like farming is something you're into.
Rush to danger, wind up nowhere
Sabriz for CSM go go go
|
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
23530
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 04:26:56 -
[2] - Quote
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:Sibyyl wrote:
If you want aggressors to pick up Criminal flag, then you should be a miner. Sounds like farming is something you're into.
What methods of ISK generation do you not consider farming then? .01 station games? We all have to pay for our pvp somehow, unless you can consistently solo pimpfit faction ships or you buy PLEX every month. Get off your high horse about farming, everyone had to do it. As long as he's doing it in a combat ship and not a quad-stabbed merlin I see no problem.
Look. You are in lowsec. The reason why you want to open fire on the other person is because you think the other person doesn't care about their sec status and will preemptively open fire you anyway.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Both of you risk a sec status hit by aggressing first. Joining Factional Warfare is not some kind of safe haven for getting shot in lowsec.
Rush to danger, wind up nowhere
Sabriz for CSM go go go
|
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
23574
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 16:33:32 -
[3] - Quote
Oreb Wing wrote:
Once again, OP is not suggesting neutrals be prohibited from entering plexes, only that they be flagged accordingly so there is no penalty to what is obviously hostile intent.
Everyone else who aggresses somebody in lowsec takes the same sec status hit that FW people do. OP is suggesting preferential sec status hit formula since he happens to be in FW. "Obviously hostile intent" isn't so obvious since you are complaining about taking a sec status hit for aggressing in the first place.
Did you have a suggestion for sec status calculations for all of lowsec in general instead of FW? People would be more receptive to that. But then again, it might make it even more likely that people will be piling into your plexes trying to shoot you.
Rush to danger, wind up nowhere
Sabriz for CSM go go go
|
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
23574
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 16:35:02 -
[4] - Quote
Dangeresque Too wrote:shouldn't "low-sec" then grant lower security status hits from "hi-sec" with the highest security status hits?
The system should step down, from hi, to low, to null. Currently hi and low are the same, and then null has none at all.
Not a bad idea, this one.
Rush to danger, wind up nowhere
Sabriz for CSM go go go
|
| |
|