| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
fredtheevil
modro
Circle-Of-Two
0
   |
Posted - 2015.02.27 17:37:45 -
[1] - Quote
Don't Nerf Bat a ship that has been just about the same though all these years. The other hac's need a boost in effective raneg/dps and the ishtar need's to be left alone or adding 2 mid's to the munin would change the meta up seriously...
Think OUTSIDE THE BOX...... |
fredtheevil
modro
Circle-Of-Two
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.28 17:52:55 -
[2] - Quote
Cr Turist wrote:fredtheevil wrote:Don't Nerf Bat a ship that has been just about the same though all these years. The other hac's need a boost in effective raneg/dps and the ishtar need's to be left alone or adding 2 mid's to the munin would change the meta up seriously...
Think OUTSIDE THE BOX...... if you honestly think ishtars dont need nerfing you need to stop go take a cold shower go for a long walk and ponder your life.
CCP needs to accomplish many other tasks before they start diving back into hac's again like the map-AI, the fact most combat anomalies are the exact same after well the better part of 10 years, Other then a Gila med drones are useless and heavy's forget about it cant track a barn flying threw the space, we were promised sov mechanic's changes just seems "illogical" to take away from something that many players have found to be a very useful ship it is a bit over powered and i say that lightly for one reason not the drones , its The massive range is its biggest benefit like currently i can tag ships over 100k without a problem
(or restrict how far u are from the sentry's like a ten k max would be a interesting Just an idea)
There should be more ships like the ishtar it should be like the baseline for hac's, other options for players that take around the same time (cerp, zealot , munin, ) investment are no where as effective for = time invested to pilot the ishtar |
fredtheevil
modro
Circle-Of-Two
0
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 18:11:23 -
[3] - Quote
tasman devil wrote:Try harder next time!
Instead of removing the assist altogether, why not just ALLOW IT ONLY TO BC AND UP???
That would have been a simple and elegant solution, currently these changes press most pilots to reconsider the need for a capital ship.
edit: also instead of removing the fighter warp function, why not have a checkbox, where the player can chose whether or not he wants the drones to pursue the target (as far as I can remember, we already HAVE this checkbox, have we not?)
Or restricting assistance from fighters to ships that have no drone bandwidth just an idea?
|
| |
|