| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lightof God
Caldari
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
   |
Posted - 2006.10.29 18:15:00 -
[1]
Ok what was the nerf to them? How bad did it hurt? and can i still use blood raider faction ships on the alt or are they just not worth it anymore?
|
Lightof God
Caldari
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
|
Posted - 2006.10.29 18:15:00 -
[2]
Ok what was the nerf to them? How bad did it hurt? and can i still use blood raider faction ships on the alt or are they just not worth it anymore?
|
Jallen
Sturmgrenadier Inc
R i s e
|
Posted - 2006.10.29 18:18:00 -
[3]
There was a nerf?
|
Jallen
Sturmgrenadier Inc
R i s e
|
Posted - 2006.10.29 18:18:00 -
[4]
There was a nerf?
|
Lightof God
Caldari
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
|
Posted - 2006.10.29 18:19:00 -
[5]
I thought there was supposed to be a kali nerf.
|
Lightof God
Caldari
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
|
Posted - 2006.10.29 18:19:00 -
[6]
I thought there was supposed to be a kali nerf.
|
Temo Jick
|
Posted - 2006.10.29 18:35:00 -
[7]
The nerf is to the Nos + ECM setups that people have been using. It is the ECM nerf. There isnt actualy a nerf specificaly to Noses as far as im aware.
|
Temo Jick
|
Posted - 2006.10.29 18:35:00 -
[8]
The nerf is to the Nos + ECM setups that people have been using. It is the ECM nerf. There isnt actualy a nerf specificaly to Noses as far as im aware.
|
Forsch
Auctoritan Syndicate
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.10.29 19:05:00 -
[9]
I have a read a dev commenting on that saying that no nosferatu changes are planned for Kali 1.
Forsch
Defender of the empire
|
Saria Mysdrial
Amarr
Research Associates
|
Posted - 2006.10.29 19:19:00 -
[10]
In fact, with the HP boost and no equivalent capacitor boost, Noferatu have become even MORE powerful in Kali 1.
|
|
|
Siege
Minmatar
Siegecraft Bounty Hunting
|
Posted - 2006.10.30 00:53:00 -
[11]
I have heard rumors regarding a NOS nerf as well, but not when or if it will be introduced. The rumor I heard was there was a bottom limit to how far you can drawn down the cap of a target ship. Once they were below, say, 30% cap... your nos wouldn't have any more effect.
|
JLB Trustee
|
Posted - 2006.10.30 09:26:00 -
[12]
 Originally by: Siege
I have heard rumors regarding a NOS nerf as well, but not when or if it will be introduced. The rumor I heard was there was a bottom limit to how far you can drawn down the cap of a target ship. Once they were below, say, 30% cap... your nos wouldn't have any more effect.
 That would be a TOTAL nos nerf. There'd be no reasons to fit nosses on a PvP ship any longer.
Nerf them, but not like that.
|
Pattern Clarc
The Priory
|
Posted - 2006.10.30 09:59:00 -
[13]
nos needs a sig or tracking nerf, right now, heavy dimissihing seems to pwn everything smaller without a cap injector.
Sig removed lacks EVE content, email [email protected] if you have any questions - Xorus |
Sleepkevert
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.10.30 10:06:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Sleepkevert on 30/10/2006 10:06:44
Originally by: JLB Trustee
Originally by: Siege
...
That would be a TOTAL nos nerf. There'd be no reasons to fit nosses on a PvP ship any longer.
Nerf them, but not like that.
Why would that be a total nerf? Your cap recharge rate drops drastically if it gets anywhere below 40%. So it would give a chance to survive an attack by a nos ship IF you have enough cap left to get that booster/repper going...
And you are forgetting the advantage of getting extra cap from the other ship to run your own modules ;).
Though I agree that there are better way's to nerf it :P.
__________________________________________________
This shall be the one thread, the one thread to rule them all, and in the Spamness bind them. - Ductoris |
gfldex
|
Posted - 2006.10.30 10:16:00 -
[15]
Tux wrote that he dont like how nos work atm. He told us that they are a nobrainer atm and that has to be changed. AFAIR he didnt wrote how it will get changed. Anyway there was no nerf on Sisi yet.
--
$ perl -n -e 'print "Stop blameing pirates! Oveur is the root of all evil!\n" if m/podkill|lost my ship|gank|gate camp|Verone/;'
|
Drutort
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.10.30 18:43:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Drutort on 30/10/2006 18:43:42
some ideas:
NOSF should have a signature/radius efficiently nerfą heavy one would not work so well on small targetsą because the ship is too small to get a lock and proper calibration of the module is not designed for small such ships so only a % of it can work on small shipsą
Of course this would be a big nerf IMO and nos small ships will suck then, its possible that nosf could get a logarithmic nerf, over timeą that the longer you use the less effective it becomes on the target? There are many ideas how to make it so that you do not always end up using nosf but it does not kill all of the cap linearly
Its possible to also have single strength for nos.. maybe if you ships computer has high strength with boost from eccm then the nosf can not be as effective to pass your ship? And those you have to use ecm to reduce the strength of the ship and to be effective with nos??? that could work with optimal and falloff then.
|
Dux Dar
|
Posted - 2006.10.30 18:56:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Drutort
Edited by: Drutort on 30/10/2006 18:43:42
some ideas:
NOSF should have a signature/radius efficiently nerfą heavy one would not work so well on small targetsą because the ship is too small to get a lock and proper calibration of the module is not designed for small such ships so only a % of it can work on small shipsą
Of course this would be a big nerf IMO and nos small ships will suck then, its possible that nosf could get a logarithmic nerf, over timeą that the longer you use the less effective it becomes on the target? There are many ideas how to make it so that you do not always end up using nosf but it does not kill all of the cap linearly
Its possible to also have single strength for nos.. maybe if you ships computer has high strength with boost from eccm then the nosf can not be as effective to pass your ship? And those you have to use ecm to reduce the strength of the ship and to be effective with nos??? that could work with optimal and falloff then.
honnestly, whan are you smal ship fans gonna stop
trying to get the devs to alow you to kill BS's solo?
|
MECTO
Xenobytes
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2006.10.30 19:02:00 -
[18]
Tux said theres no nosf nerf in kali1. maybe in kali2 then 
It's Great Being Carebear in Kali - aint it?
Originally by: Tuxford
In this picture you might think that Gallente totally pwn. Well they're alright
|
50freefly
Caldari
Purify
|
Posted - 2006.11.03 04:52:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Dux Dar
Originally by: Drutort
Edited by: Drutort on 30/10/2006 18:43:42
some ideas:
NOSF should have a signature/radius efficiently nerfą heavy one would not work so well on small targetsą because the ship is too small to get a lock and proper calibration of the module is not designed for small such ships so only a % of it can work on small shipsą
Of course this would be a big nerf IMO and nos small ships will suck then, its possible that nosf could get a logarithmic nerf, over timeą that the longer you use the less effective it becomes on the target? There are many ideas how to make it so that you do not always end up using nosf but it does not kill all of the cap linearly
Its possible to also have single strength for nos.. maybe if you ships computer has high strength with boost from eccm then the nosf can not be as effective to pass your ship? And those you have to use ecm to reduce the strength of the ship and to be effective with nos??? that could work with optimal and falloff then.
honnestly, whan are you smal ship fans gonna stop
trying to get the devs to alow you to kill BS's solo?
QFT
Nos is a battleships last resort against small ships... 2 interceptors should not be able to kill a BS solo and a tracking nerf would allow that to happen.
Originally by: Eight Ace
For reasons that have been lost in the mists of time all caldari ships are designed by two people. One does the left hand side and the other does the right.
And they never meet.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |