| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
JoeT
Amarr
Short Attention Span
   |
Posted - 2006.11.09 02:28:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: albert camus
im not really an industrial guy but why not make a ship that can only move ships ( i have a carrier so idea sort stolen from this) Maybe enough for 3 or 4 criusers.
Occator with 6 named cargo expanders :)
---
If i'm posting on the forums, it's mostly cause i'm at work :D
|
Gordon Red
SteelVipers
YouWhat
|
Posted - 2006.11.09 03:28:00 -
[32]
I would say, let the T1-industrials how the are!
The T2-industrials should fill the role of a medium sized cargo transporter, bceause otherwise it is too easy to haul really high amounts of stuff around.
|
Roemy Schneider
BINFORD
|
Posted - 2006.11.09 03:36:00 -
[33]
i'd really like to transport at least 1 BS in my itti V / occator, so if the size of those repackaged buggers would be halved, it'd do the trick without whacking the entire hauling/trading/otherwise
|
Shardrael
Caldari
AWE Corporation
Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.11.09 06:03:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Laboratus
Freighter docking/loading array for poses kthxbye.
omfg yes plz 
Originally by: Pinky Denmark
Caldari have other options like using rails or train for other ships/weapons...
|
Lygos
ISS Navy Task Force
|
Posted - 2006.11.09 06:08:00 -
[35]
Three words:
Specialized Cargo Containers.
---
Private Investment should preceed Public Investment |
Alekzander
Caldari
Scorn.
|
Posted - 2006.11.09 07:10:00 -
[36]
I'd agree to this if they couldn't warp to belts, but I'd allow them to warp to POS's and have access to hangars and such. Cause moving outpost minerals by hauler takes for ever. Hell I'd even allow them to warp to belts on just the fact that they have NO turret slots and that they cant open jet cans. Actually... wait no... gonna leave it as not opening jet cans. If they could that would make standard haulers useless.
|
Riddick06
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 20:00:00 -
[37]
Edited by: Rid****06 on 10/11/2006 20:01:58
Originally by: Roemy Schneider
i'd really like to transport at least 1 BS in my itti V / occator, so if the size of those repackaged buggers would be halved, it'd do the trick without whacking the entire hauling/trading/otherwise
Tbh i think all industrials should be able to fit atleast 2 cruiser sized ships in their holds at present. Increasing the size of indys might have a negative affect on other aspects of the game but being able to compress the ships m3 is probably the best alternative and why not!?
Originally by: James Lyrus
Bah, size matters not.
Now, a jump drive freighter? That I'd go for :)
id like that too but one step at a time 
|
baru Pel
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 21:47:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Rid****06
Currently only the iteron V can haul more than 2 cruisers and would cost over 100mil in mods. Increasing the holds of industrials will cost less to haul more and probably be an incentive to flood the low sec market with ships/mods by small time traders maybe even miners.
would the mins required for 2 to 4 cruisers + a couple of bpcs make it an easier trip? just a thought
|
Ezratu
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 23:52:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Shinshi Casoyako
Dont we have transporters as middle indy atm? Shure its not the 70k m3 OP wants but you should make a difference between indies and frieghters.
No we don't. Without named expanders, neither of the Gallente transports can beat an Itty V. Yes, the Viator is fast and the Occator has a great tank and can outdo the Itty V if you fit nameds, but in terms of pure cargo capacity, one is not better than the Itty V and one is barely better.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |