| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cycule
Mortis Angelus
The Kadeshi
5
   |
Posted - 2015.05.07 15:19:44 -
[1] - Quote
Why no love for our logistics?
Over the last couple of years CCP has developed some fine Logistics ships. The Navitas, the Inquisitor, the Burst, the Bantam all originally small mining frigates changed into logistics ships with good bonus for remote armor repairing and remote shield repairing. The same can be said for our cruiser level logiGÇÖs. These would be our Augoror, Exequror, Scythe and Osprey . The difference here is that CCP gave the cruiser level logistic ships a T2 Variant. . I feel like CCP miss something here, they did right by making frigate class logistics ships, but failed to give them a T2 Variant. Making a T2 variant of the Frigate class logistics class gates would be very simple to create and they would complement your new addition of T3 Destroyers. I also think the T3 destroyers were a little too early to release when you have no real logistics for the T3 Destroyers. Maybe the focus should have been on a T2 variant of the frigate class logistics? Eve is going into a new SOV mechanic that will rely on small gang activity more often than the past and this would have been a fantastic addition.
As the years passed us by CCP introduce the first battleship class logistic ship called the Nestor. Prior to this, there were no battleship class logistic ships. The problem here is that they only made the Nestor an armor type of logistics ship. Do not get me wrong the ability the nestor brings, matches the reason why it is a faction type battleship and in a class of its own because of the refitting service it has. But unfortunately there has not been a lot of use this ability yet because of the price tag it brings. So why not start with T1 class battleship logistics ship with capabilities of slight increase range of large armor repairing and slight increase of large armor repairer amount. Forcing the use of large armor repairers on a battleship class logistics ship. Right now you can fit dead space medium type armor repairers on a Nestor and get matching range to a large armor repairer and armor repair amount. Seem the whole logistics battleship class was abandoned and went right for the Faction Logistics battleship.
So what do you think People of New Eden, do we want to see T2 Frigate Logistics and T1 Battleship Logistics for shield and armor?
Love to get everyoneGÇÖs feedback. |
Cycule
Mortis Angelus
The Kadeshi
5
|
Posted - 2015.05.07 17:23:08 -
[2] - Quote
ShahFluffers wrote:FYI:
Tech 2 cruiser Logi ships = battleship class Logi
The reason is because...
- they use large reppers
- they are almost as expensive as battleships.
- the reason they are cruisers is because "real" battleship-class logis would have godawful amounts of HP (150 to 200k ehp compared to 40 to 60k ehp)... and the last thing we need is another VERY powerful force multiplier class (that scales well) with "MOAR HP and MOAR capacitor reserve!"
In fact... it is the lower HP and capacitor pool that are effectively the ONLY weaknesses of T2 Logi Cruisers (aside from the need for some of them to have a "partner").
As for Tech 2 frigate logi... if we follow the same paradigm as T1 and T2 Logi Cruisers then T2 Logi Frigs would be "cruiser-class" logis... able to fit medium sized remote reppers in a frigate sized package with the same benefits of a frigate (see: greater mobility, which is HUGE in EVE).
IMO... logi is already too powerful.
How about frigates, what's your point of view on a T2 class frigate logi?
Also what's your thoughts on the Nestor? |
Cycule
Mortis Angelus
The Kadeshi
6
|
Posted - 2015.05.12 19:38:23 -
[3] - Quote
Logis the way they are I would agree that they are well balanced. But deos anyone think since there is a nestor, should we get a Shield version since the battleship logi is already made?
Thoughts? |
| |
|