ah that's easy you just tell me which would cause you the most tears, then assume that ;)

Is there any information as to which structures will be able to deploy in whspace? At this point that is the biggest question I think most have. As I didn't see anything that shows where you can deploy them other than weapons.

We know you will be able to use Citadels in wormhole space. The devs have said they want wormhole space to be able to use all of them, but with restrictions

ideally i'd want totally destroyable one

You want them all to be destructable or you want one of them to be destructable?

When they get destroyed do you want loots or do you want space magic for asset protection?

tell you what why don't you tell me what you want and why?

Well here is the main question. Assuming that these things will be able to defend themselves vs a troll ceptor....

Do we need the timezone protection mechanic for w space? This isn't a issue of space or use as wspace isn't sov.

I understand the need for it in nullsec. I am not sold of the need for it in wspace. It would be a bit more brutal and more timezone coverage would be needed. But knowing the structures can put up at least some defense, i wonder if its needed.

I'm going to hold off on any speculative judgement atm.

Imo I hope they keep it and according to the quote earlier it will naturally be 6-8 hours or so. I think the ability to deliberatly attack out of the defenders tz (aswell as time the rf timer to do the same) is bad gameplay

We'd definitely need some more detailed mechanic on how the structures Actually function when a person moores/docks/whatever with it. Also how to tell who's home and who is not.

Some concerns i have.

the fact you can anchor them anywhere.

docking/link games

Since they could be anywhere how will you find them?

You want them all to be destructable or you want one of them to be destructable?

When they get destroyed do you want loots or do you want space magic for asset protection?

We need to be able to see who is docked/moored on dscan with ship type and then when on grid have the same pilot info we have now.

In reverse the same intel needs to be available to those that are docked/moored, they should still have the same dscan functionality they have now.

The why of this is for several reasons but mostly if you lack this information in both sides docked or a visitor then you will think empty system and no interations between both of those parties will occur.

We're considering letting you scan who is docked inside these structures.

Also yes docking games suck, so do force field games. We're accepting input on how we can setup the docking / invuln link to improve this, for all of space not just WH.

CCP is problably going to say **** it & leave old pos in w-space just cause.

Thanks for putting devblogs about this important issue out long before making final designdecisions.
Some questions I came up with:

1.Will the structures have a predefined undock? Will you be able to bump ships within the invullinked area? What ranges are you plaining for the linked areas? 2,5 like docking or 20 like a FF? Will it work like the invultimer upon undocking so the player can decide when to break it or will you be autolinked if within range like a FF now?

2.Unless you are able to bring capitals (c1-4 or highsec, where most of the small corps live) or completely stupid numbers the timeinvestement to RF a well defended (resi-,****- or deathstar) is 2-5 hours. This is more to stop people from even thinking about it than actual defense.
Will the entosistime be along the same numbers, the nullnumbers so far suggest no.
The current POSdefenses and mechanics are hugely imbalanced towrds the defender in smaller conflics. But this is also the reason why smaller groups, especially in lowend WHs, can survive and have fun without getting facerolled just because they are there (like in sov-nullsec).

3.T2 entosis has 250 km range so structureweapons and ewar have to have a range higher than that to be of any use. That just sounds wrong. I could also entosis from the undock of next structure over.

4.Placing them everywhere would include inside of static DED pockets.

5.What will be the cynorestrictions near structures? None like stations or far away like a POS?

6.If you don-¦t limit them to number of moons how do you plan on keeping them on a handable level? I can see 200+ of those strucs in jita just because we can. And there is no UI that works well on those numbers. Most Whs of larger corps have already 50+ towers in system.

7.Scanning the structures equals uncloaking, getting spotted and being blabbed by structureguns. Are scanners that work while cloaked a possibility?

8.Drones as weapons, I do not like. Not just because I hate the current drones everywhere meta but because I think a station should not launch some small throwaway drones to defend but starships.

9.Will the citadels have captain-¦s quarters?

I want destructable so I can destroy it.
I want loot because loot is good.

EDIT: I want on record what you want so I can compare what you say here and now to what gets put in future CSM minutes.

What do you want and why?

It only took me 1 minute to answer when you asked me directly. It's been almost 24 hours since I asked you.

But let's get back to this gem:

"We are also thinking of having them visible and directly warpable from the on-board scanner to preserve Wormhole space gameplay.

How in holy hell does that "preserve Wormhole Space Gameplay" ?

so reading is pretty hard and i usually only forum browse while i am at work and my attention is split.

so i have one very important question, that need a simple answer. (don't wall of text me bro)

Will any of these changes make it easier to kick out those inactive tards who log in once a week to farm and otherwise provide 0 Content?