Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Desorem
Gray Hunters The Gorgon Spawn
5
|
Posted - 2015.05.12 18:21:27 -
[1] - Quote
Less then two days before deadline so... How will meta-alliances such as GE+GS, INIT+Init Mercs be treated? As one structure or as separate alliances? |
Mangala Solaris
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1232
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 08:14:47 -
[2] - Quote
Asking the same as Desorem here regarding RvB.
RvB Ganked: EVE's Number One Weekly Public Roam
|
|
CCP Logibro
C C P C C P Alliance
891
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 11:08:35 -
[3] - Quote
As with the past, we will allow those Alliances to compete as one group. If this applies to you, please have both executors file a ticket indicating they wish to compete as one group.
CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics
@CCP_Logibro
|
|
Marcel Devereux
Aideron Robotics
452
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 15:19:53 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:As with the past, we will allow those Alliances to compete as one group. If this applies to you, please have both executors file a ticket indicating they wish to compete as one group.
Hold on a second. If you are letting meta-alliances compete as one, then you better allow corporations to compete as well. |
Mila Strelok
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
38
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 15:46:58 -
[5] - Quote
Marcel Devereux wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:As with the past, we will allow those Alliances to compete as one group. If this applies to you, please have both executors file a ticket indicating they wish to compete as one group. Hold on a second. If you are letting meta-alliances compete as one, then you better allow corporations to compete as well. I approve this
|
Feronanthus
Aideron Robotics
0
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 17:15:54 -
[6] - Quote
Marcel Devereux wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:As with the past, we will allow those Alliances to compete as one group. If this applies to you, please have both executors file a ticket indicating they wish to compete as one group. Hold on a second. If you are letting meta-alliances compete as one, then you better allow corporations to compete as well.
Besides the fact its called "Alliance Tournament" why is it limited to alliances (or apparently meta-alliances/coalitions) only? We all remember what happened last year when you let an alliance in fact only enter *cough* CODE. *cough* |
Mystic Rebel
Russian Thunder Squad The Afterlife.
295
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 18:47:15 -
[7] - Quote
I hope this year Waffles will be considered as PL's meta-alliance (as it must be) and not as separate entity just because some ex-PL dudes know better. |
Lucas Quaan
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
86
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 19:18:57 -
[8] - Quote
Mystic Rebel wrote:I hope this year Waffles will be considered as PL's meta-alliance (as it must be) and not as separate entity just because some ex-PL dudes know better. The ruling says that affiliates can ask to be treated as one, not that they have to. GE and GS are free to run as separate teams if they want, just like Waffles.
Besides, GE/GS or Red/Blue have way more interaction than PL/Waffles anyway. |
Mystic Rebel
Russian Thunder Squad The Afterlife.
295
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 19:55:04 -
[9] - Quote
Lucas Quaan wrote:Mystic Rebel wrote:I hope this year Waffles will be considered as PL's meta-alliance (as it must be) and not as separate entity just because some ex-PL dudes know better. The ruling says that affiliates can ask to be treated as one, not that they have to. GE and GS are free to run as separate teams if they want, just like Waffles. Besides, GE/GS or Red/Blue have way more interaction than PL/Waffles anyway. Mate you area actually wrong. I'm pretty sure they are made participate as a part of their core alliance or not participate at all. I remember last year debates.
Regarding Waffles, it's not about the level of independence, it's about rule equity for everyone. Otherwise CCP must include additional explanations on which alliances are considered as meta and which are not. With exact and transparent criteria. |
Lucas Quaan
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
86
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 21:05:03 -
[10] - Quote
Mystic Rebel wrote:Lucas Quaan wrote:Mystic Rebel wrote:I hope this year Waffles will be considered as PL's meta-alliance (as it must be) and not as separate entity just because some ex-PL dudes know better. The ruling says that affiliates can ask to be treated as one, not that they have to. GE and GS are free to run as separate teams if they want, just like Waffles. Besides, GE/GS or Red/Blue have way more interaction than PL/Waffles anyway. Mate you area actually wrong. I'm pretty sure they are made participate as a part of their core alliance or not participate at all. I remember last year debates. Regarding Waffles, it's not about the level of independence, it's about rule equity for everyone. Otherwise CCP must include additional explanations on which alliances are considered as meta and which are not. With exact and transparent criteria. Pretty sure RvB asked for purple.
Besides, if your argument is independence then FA, Razor, TNT and the likes would have to compete with Goons and you would have to fly as one big team with the rest of your coalition. Otherwise, what kinds of criteria are you asking for that wouldn't be more arbitrary than that? Waffles share neither standings nor command structure with PL and live on the other side of the map. |
|
Mystic Rebel
Russian Thunder Squad The Afterlife.
295
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 21:12:38 -
[11] - Quote
Lucas Quaan wrote:Mystic Rebel wrote:Lucas Quaan wrote:Mystic Rebel wrote:I hope this year Waffles will be considered as PL's meta-alliance (as it must be) and not as separate entity just because some ex-PL dudes know better. The ruling says that affiliates can ask to be treated as one, not that they have to. GE and GS are free to run as separate teams if they want, just like Waffles. Besides, GE/GS or Red/Blue have way more interaction than PL/Waffles anyway. Mate you area actually wrong. I'm pretty sure they are made participate as a part of their core alliance or not participate at all. I remember last year debates. Regarding Waffles, it's not about the level of independence, it's about rule equity for everyone. Otherwise CCP must include additional explanations on which alliances are considered as meta and which are not. With exact and transparent criteria. Pretty sure RvB asked for purple. Besides, if your argument is independence then FA, Razor, TNT and the likes would have to compete with Goons and you would have to fly as one big team with the rest of your coalition. Otherwise, what kinds of criteria are you asking for that wouldn't be more arbitrary than that? Waffles share neither standings nor command structure with PL and live on the other side of the map. Then a line must be added to rules with exact list of requirements, for instance, fully independent team leadership and member roster. I have no problem with that. But make equal conditions for everyone.
Because last year it was more like "those teams are allowed and those are not". Why? Because CCP decided so. |
Jayne Fillon
665
|
Posted - 2015.05.14 07:10:23 -
[12] - Quote
Marcel Devereux wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:As with the past, we will allow those Alliances to compete as one group. If this applies to you, please have both executors file a ticket indicating they wish to compete as one group. Hold on a second. If you are letting meta-alliances compete as one, then you better allow corporations to compete as well. +1
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Medusa The Gorgon
Temple of the Serpent The Gorgon Empire
3
|
Posted - 2015.05.30 09:16:26 -
[13] - Quote
Lucas Quaan wrote:[quote=Mystic Rebel]GE and GS are free to run as separate teams if they want, just like Waffles. No. I tried, CCP prohibited this for AT XII
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |