| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
konkord
eXceed Inc.
   |
Posted - 2006.11.10 20:23:00 -
[1]
If we're doing warp to 0.... what do people think about the ability of deploying SMALL warp bubbles in 0.4 < systems?
Or at least, some kind of system to pull someone a little off the 0km?
Im not bothered to be honest, makes my life easier, as a balance to remove bm's... this would help.
----------------------
|
Pious Pete
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 20:26:00 -
[2]
Pro gatecampers who sit on a gate with 35 ships will simply have a combined force of 250 trial accounts logged in the next door system, causing anyone who dare warp-to-0 onto their gate to get queued. 
|
Joshua Foiritain
Gallente
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 20:27:00 -
[3]
Not really needed tbh, gate camping doesn't change much. Its insta docking from anywhere anytime that'll screw stuff up.
-----
[Coreli Corporation Mainframe] |
konkord
eXceed Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 20:30:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Not really needed tbh, gate camping doesn't change much. Its insta docking from anywhere anytime that'll screw stuff up.
same affect, different application. a tool that pulls 'warp to 0' users off even by 5km. some sort of deployable bubble? some type of sphere?
----------------------
|
asdasdaasdasd
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 20:47:00 -
[5]
Edited by: asdasdaasdasd on 10/11/2006 20:49:05
Delete
|
Guano Cakes
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 20:48:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Not really needed tbh, gate camping doesn't change much. Its insta docking from anywhere anytime that'll screw stuff up.
So.. options for stations?
1. Allow warp-to-0 to stations
2. Do not allow warp-to-0, but allow instas
3. Do not allow EITHER warp-to-0 or instas to stations
Let's just strike off option #3 right now and get it out of the way. Reasons below.
Option number 2 changes little and would likely encourage the boom of station-insta bookmark sets and their sales if gate-to-gates are no longer needed. Eventually we'd have the same problem all over again only everyone would be copying station instas all day.
Just think about this. Everyone including yourself, lives out of stations. Disallowing insta-docks would cause endless griefing of production corps and such that require access to the station simply to operate AT ALL, and indirectly affect everyone else who needed to use the station for anything, even simply to set a clone or possibly buy a new ship after getting blown up. Where do you think the lazy low-sec snipers will go once their gate camping becomes less lucrative? The busiest stations they can find, probably. Victims can't defend themselves in low sec because they will lose security and be criminally flagged, unless they let attackers get the first strike so they have kill rights, which is giving hostile players (such as pirates) a huge advantage. You simply cannot function under these conditions. Correct me if I'm totally wrong on any of those points because I think I've covered everything imporant.
So to me that leaves option #1, IF warp-to-0 does in fact go live.
|
asdasdaasdasd
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 20:49:00 -
[7]
Edited by: asdasdaasdasd on 10/11/2006 20:50:11
Delete
|
Ficti0n
FireTech
Imperium Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 20:50:00 -
[8]
Nice Sig Konk!
post aint bad either 
|
konkord
eXceed Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 22:30:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Ficti0n
Nice Sig Konk!
post aint bad either
heh
cheers. hope all is well with you and yours.
----------------------
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |