| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
0
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 13:59:35 -
[1] - Quote
The Declassified Report
For the safety of New Eden, I have approved the declassification of Project Looking Glass. Neither I nor any other TerminalDogma member will be taking questions at this time. Thank you. |

Jili Tonari
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 14:20:46 -
[2] - Quote
This is fascinating!
Take readings of some of the New Eden systems, noting the relation to neighboring stars (preferably young, cooler ones with a long life-expectancy) such as distance, age and movement along the galactic plane then calculate their positions along a time-line accounting for galactic rotation, then all you have to do is go back to the matching Anoikis system, find those stars and you'll have your date and irrefutable proof! You can back that up with data on the estimated age and progression of the Eden/Anoikis stars. Check to see how much of reduction there is in the amount of say, hydrogen a younger star is burning, then go to the counterpart and see how much less there is and you'll be able to estimate the time differential!
Wait...does that mean we're the Drifters too?
|

Saede Riordan
Alexylva Paradox Low-Class
7593
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 15:14:11 -
[3] - Quote
If this is correct it has massive implications.
Fear and Loathing in Internet Spaceships
|

Rhavas
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
437
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 15:18:09 -
[4] - Quote
Very very interesting. This matches a hypothesis I've had for years but didn't gather enough data to prove. The primary reason I discarded the theory was that none of the k space systems I was evaluating seemed to have a sufficient match although others did. Do you have matches for any of the previously known shattered systems (e.g. Seyllin)?
I'm also not sure I agree with your time travel conclusion - I would lean more toward a parallel or out of phase model.
Author of Interstellar Privateer
Shattered Planets, Wormholes and Game Commentary
|

Teinyhr
Ourumur
448
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 15:18:12 -
[5] - Quote
Saede Riordan wrote:If this is correct it has massive implications.
If this is correct, this is the understatement of the year. |

Rena Risalo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 15:19:05 -
[6] - Quote
Saede Riordan wrote:If this is correct it has massive implications.
Thats kind of an understatement.
If this is true, and from the information its likely it is, this will change the face of New Eden forever. |

Makoto Priano
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
7022
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 15:56:47 -
[7] - Quote
Time travel.
Huh.
So-- if this is true, we should be able to identify parallels for 100% of W-Space systems in K-Space. Were you able to do this? If so, were you able to determine a pattern of drift based on your presumed theory of rapid cluster rotation? Mind, I'm still wondering why an unbound, non-homogeneous body would deform instead of simply scattering, but...
(edit: oh, right. No questions at this time. Welp.)
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries: exploring the edge of the known, advancing the state of the art. Would you like to know more?
|

Radical Divinity
Signal Cartel EvE-Scout Enclave
5
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 15:57:43 -
[8] - Quote
It's clear. Currently we're living within a historical simulation designed to trace the events that lead to the current state of Anoikis. |

Lucas Raholan
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
137
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 16:01:40 -
[9] - Quote
Are we really suggesting time travel now, it seems people are abandoning reason and sense in pursuit of science and toward insanity and delusion.
I fear the A'J project has drifted far from what Dr Tukoss envisioned it to be, such a shame as it had such great promise only to now be staffed by fools and madmen
I'm secretly a unicorn that Sh**ts fairy dust and sings all day-á
|

Berluth Luthian
Hoplite Brigade
203
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 16:05:43 -
[10] - Quote
Does this affect where statics spawn? |

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
5
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 16:13:06 -
[11] - Quote
Makoto Priano wrote:Time travel.
Huh.
So-- if this is true, we should be able to identify parallels for 100% of W-Space systems in K-Space. Were you able to do this? If so, were you able to determine a pattern of drift based on your presumed theory of rapid cluster rotation? Mind, I'm still wondering why an unbound, non-homogeneous body would deform instead of simply scattering, but...
(edit: oh, right. No questions at this time. Welp.)
I'll make one exception here. That's as far as we were able to get on our own, and given the gravity of the situation before us and the fact that Anoikis appears to in fact be either an alternate New Eden or a future New Eden, the ultimate consensus was that it was best to lower our shroud enough for more eyes to look at it and see what the larger scientific community can figure out.
The reason I made the call of not accepting questions was to avoid getting bombarded and essentially denial-of-service attacked as a person given the nature of the implications. Where a valid concern or point exists that I notice, I'll try to duck out for a bit and address it. As for 100% of w-space systems, at the time, yes. Since the initial progress of Looking Glass however, the shattered systems showed up, and we don't have matches for those. Given that our script starts at the star and expands outwards attempting to locate a match, this presents a problem. I'm hoping the greater scientific community of New Eden can figure that one out. |

Makoto Priano
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
7022
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 16:28:24 -
[12] - Quote
So. 100% of unshattered W-Space systems have a match in star type, and planet types sequentially, in known space? With maximum variation in orbit size of under... 5%? 8%? And other planetary factors such as size, escape velocity, etc, largely matching as well? In 100% of cases?
And completely understood on demurring on questions. The autopsy team did likewise, as they were subject to an apparent bombardment of both bitter recriminations and fandom.
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries: exploring the edge of the known, advancing the state of the art. Would you like to know more?
|

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
6
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 16:33:12 -
[13] - Quote
Makoto Priano wrote:So. 100% of unshattered W-Space systems have a match in star type, and planet types sequentially, in known space? With maximum variation in orbit size of under... 5%? 8%? And other planetary factors such as size, escape velocity, etc, largely matching as well? In 100% of cases?
And completely understood on demurring on questions. The autopsy team did likewise, as they were subject to an apparent bombardment of both bitter recriminations and fandom.
In 100% of cases, each Anoikis system has a New Eden perfect match, with only minor variations in changes of planet type, but just about everything else, including the star's attributes remaining identical. Exceptions only cropped up with the discovery of shattered systems. To demonstrate this, Appendix A gives a large chunk of the list, but deliberately leaves some of it off in order to encourage the larger community to develop their own systems to complete the list, and use these as a launching pad from which to attempt to discover that which we didn't in two years of kicking it around. |

Makoto Priano
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
7022
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 16:40:12 -
[14] - Quote
100% of cases, perfect match, minor changes of planet type. One of these is not like the other. By minor variation of planet type, is this-- 5% of planet classes not matching? 20%? 50%? While planet order, size, and other composition including moon count remain the same?
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries: exploring the edge of the known, advancing the state of the art. Would you like to know more?
|

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
7
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 16:50:26 -
[15] - Quote
Makoto Priano wrote:100% of cases, perfect match, minor changes of planet type. One of these is not like the other. By minor variation of planet type, is this-- 5% of planet classes not matching? 20%? 50%? While planet order, size, and other composition including moon count remain the same?
Planet order and moon count are always the same, based on spot checks over time size and other attributes appear to remain the same but there's just too much data to manually pour over and doublecheck. I've never found a wrong match though on any of my spot checks. But if you look at the Dotlan celestial pages side by side, stars are identical, moon count per planet is identical, order is identical, but sometimes lava planets cool into barren planets, Storm planets become Temperate, etc. In one bizarre example we saw a gas giant either condense into an ice planet, or somehow eject its gas, leaving an icy core. We see this here:
J135304
LA2-KV
The last planet's moons are the same and it retains the same orbit period of 5716.6 days and the same orbital radius of 25.714 AU, even with the same somehow atmospheric pressure of 124.58 kPa and a radius of 19,760 km. But somehow it gained mass and is just ice now. We can't figure out what the hell could have caused this, but cannot deny that it appears to in fact be the same planet, following some major event. |

Rosal Milag
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 16:52:46 -
[16] - Quote
Time travel seems a very large leap, given our current understanding of physics. If we discount the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the result. To that end, the close similarity of the systems suggests a much more chilling, yet similarly monumental scale of revelation. J-space was created by some entity for the purpose of planning a galactic invasion.
Yes, there is the massive costs and astronomical, no pun intended, scale of materials needed. But consider this. To launch an invasion, you begin by simulating your field of battle. Often on a simplified scale or dimension, hence a flattened galactic plane. Next, you send your troops to begin exercises in the field, learning the lay of the land, and how to use the environment to your advantage. There has been a sleeper presence, which I believe is VR, in J-space since their discovery. Using drones to simulate the soldiers on the field, either in battle or training is nothing new. Finally, once the commanders are confident in their battle plans, they begin establishing beachheads in preparation for a full out assault. This is the drifter presence we see now. And ties in with the video feed of the fleet of drifters.
I don't want to speculate what sort of mind would create a copy of new eden for the express purpose of using said copy as a training area, but if true, this planning has been going on for a very long time, long enough for minor perturbations to amplify over time, causing a difference in orbits and global environmental shifts, barren to temperate for example. |

Rena Risalo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 17:09:35 -
[17] - Quote
Rosal Milag wrote:Time travel seems a very large leap, given our current understanding of physics. If we discount the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the result. To that end, the close similarity of the systems suggests a much more chilling, yet similarly monumental scale of revelation. J-space was created by some entity for the purpose of planning a galactic invasion.
Yes, there is the massive costs and astronomical, no pun intended, scale of materials needed. But consider this. To launch an invasion, you begin by simulating your field of battle. Often on a simplified scale or dimension, hence a flattened galactic plane. Next, you send your troops to begin exercises in the field, learning the lay of the land, and how to use the environment to your advantage. There has been a sleeper presence, which I believe is VR, in J-space since their discovery. Using drones to simulate the soldiers on the field, either in battle or training is nothing new. Finally, once the commanders are confident in their battle plans, they begin establishing beachheads in preparation for a full out assault. This is the drifter presence we see now. And ties in with the video feed of the fleet of drifters.
I don't want to speculate what sort of mind would create a copy of new eden for the express purpose of using said copy as a training area, but if true, this planning has been going on for a very long time, long enough for minor perturbations to amplify over time, causing a difference in orbits and global environmental shifts, barren to temperate for example.
Do you realize just how insane that sounds?
Time travel is a bridge too far but creating a full matter simulation of new eden is your theory? Lay off the boosters mate. |

Esteban Dragonovic
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
90
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 17:14:45 -
[18] - Quote
Rosal Milag wrote: J-space was created by some entity for the purpose of planning a galactic invasion.
Yes, there is the massive costs and astronomical, no pun intended, scale of materials needed.
If you can create star systems, why would you need to invade new ones? Building them just to simulate invading them is simply not cost efficient. |

Rosal Milag
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 17:21:48 -
[19] - Quote
Esteban Dragonovic wrote:Rosal Milag wrote: J-space was created by some entity for the purpose of planning a galactic invasion.
Yes, there is the massive costs and astronomical, no pun intended, scale of materials needed. If you can create star systems, why would you need to invade new ones? Building them just to simulate invading them is simply not cost efficient.
Cost effective for whom? Sacrificing a dread because it's too long to jump back isn't cost effective for a small corporation. But Black Legion did so in mass numbers. Look to our cluster for one simple resource. Humans. Where else are you going to find the trillions of human beings? |

Rena Risalo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 17:25:42 -
[20] - Quote
Esteban Dragonovic wrote:Rosal Milag wrote: J-space was created by some entity for the purpose of planning a galactic invasion.
Yes, there is the massive costs and astronomical, no pun intended, scale of materials needed. If you can create star systems, why would you need to invade new ones? Building them just to simulate invading them is simply not cost efficient.
Exactly. What remains is however shocking, whatever the truth turns out to be. Wormholes to a galaxy that just happens to connect to systems that have almost exact matches to our own? Thats too much of a coincidence for me to discount time travel/parallel universe idea. Nothing else really explains it. One thing we could do is try to see where the shattered wormhole systems parallel to (im betting near carolines star) , and where in the j space the eve gate wound up. |

Rena Risalo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 17:34:03 -
[21] - Quote
Rosal Milag wrote:Esteban Dragonovic wrote:Rosal Milag wrote: J-space was created by some entity for the purpose of planning a galactic invasion.
Yes, there is the massive costs and astronomical, no pun intended, scale of materials needed. If you can create star systems, why would you need to invade new ones? Building them just to simulate invading them is simply not cost efficient. Cost effective for whom? Sacrificing a dread because it's too long to jump back isn't cost effective for a small corporation. But Black Legion did so in mass numbers. Look to our cluster for one simple resource. Humans. Where else are you going to find the trillions of human beings?
Look, as i said lay off the boosters. If this were the case drifter ships would have a Sanshas Nation logo on the side. The nation makes incursions to get warm bodies all the time. You dont need such a complex staging ground for that. All the drifters would have to do is ally or work with the nation. Or take them over first. Its just too much effort to create all that space just for practice. If that had the power to manipulate matter and energy to that degree time travel wouldnt really be out of the question and would probably be simpler. |

joecuster
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
43
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 17:55:25 -
[22] - Quote
Will Gauss wrote:The Declassified ReportFor the safety of New Eden, I have approved the declassification of Project Looking Glass. Neither I nor any other TerminalDogma member will be taking questions at this time. Thank you.
never cringed so hard in my life |

Onslaughtor
Occult National Security Phoenix Naval Systems
137
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 18:09:31 -
[23] - Quote
When I was in TS-F we reviewed several sleeper artifacts. One of which allowed for precise travel in 4 dimensions... This data seems to match up with a hairball theory we hatched at the time, but was stored on lacking data. However I would shy away from the thought that this is time travel and more a form of proof that at type of multiverse theory is accurate and that Anoikis is a copy of New Eden. The name that is cataloged for the region may be of some insite.
{Anoikis is a form of programmed cell death that is induced by anchorage-dependent cells detaching from the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM). Usually cells stay close to the tissue to which they belong since the communication between proximal cells as well as between cells and ECM provide essential signals for growth or survival. When cells are detached from the ECM, there is a loss of normal cellGÇômatrix interactions, and they may undergo anoikis. However, metastatic tumor cells may escape from anoikis and invade other organs.} Copied from public data archives
Reviewing this its almost a one to one of what we are looking at. In this case the Drifters are a living metaphor for a cancer that is trying to spread from one organ to another. From their version of New Eden without an underlying matrix to ours with. According to this aped metaphor and the survey data gathered here Anoikis is undergoing 'cell death' a slow decay where a the structure holding together the systems are failing and will eventually lead the space to be officially dead.
|

Jade Blackwind
Alexylva Paradox Low-Class
526
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 18:22:46 -
[24] - Quote
Will Gauss wrote:The Declassified ReportFor the safety of New Eden, I have approved the declassification of Project Looking Glass. Neither I nor any other TerminalDogma member will be taking questions at this time. Thank you.
Interesting. But what about that simple fact that New Eden is observable from Anoikis?
hehe
|

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
7
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 18:25:02 -
[25] - Quote
Jade Blackwind wrote:Will Gauss wrote:The Declassified ReportFor the safety of New Eden, I have approved the declassification of Project Looking Glass. Neither I nor any other TerminalDogma member will be taking questions at this time. Thank you. Interesting. But what about that simple fact that New Eden is observable from Anoikis? hehe
If you guys can figure out an explanation for that, I'd love to see it and I'm looking forward to seeing what the larger scientific community does with this information. |

Quattras Peione
SUPREME MATHEMATICS A Band Apart.
96
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 18:33:44 -
[26] - Quote
There are fascinating, if potentially terrible, implications to this.
I had considered the possibility that the wormholes we traverse connect disparate time as well as space. That said, I am not entirely convinced that Anoikis is a future instance of the New Eden cluster. First, as Project Compass discovered, the physical distance between the two clusters can be pretty definitively calculated.
Second, the name Usi - a system out of which I operated - stuck out, and I noted that there are two J-systems tagged as exact matches for it. I did not notice if this was the case for any others, but it only adds further questions.
Dr. Quattras Alvar Peione
No, I'm not that kind of doctor.
|

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
7
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 18:40:28 -
[27] - Quote
Quattras Peione wrote:There are fascinating, if potentially terrible, implications to this.
I had considered the possibility that the wormholes we traverse connect disparate time as well as space. That said, I am not entirely convinced that Anoikis is a future instance of the New Eden cluster. First, as Project Compass discovered, the physical distance between the two clusters can be pretty definitively calculated.
Second, the name Usi - a system out of which I operated - stuck out, and I noted that there are two J-systems tagged as exact matches for it. I did not notice if this was the case for any others, but it only adds further questions.
You are correct. Looking at these two Anoikis systems, they appear to be mirrors of each other as well. In two years of looking at this we didn't notice that. In five hours of it being out in the public you did. This right here is why we just released what we had.
J145337
J161257 |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
2169
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 19:51:42 -
[28] - Quote
The Compass 2.5 findings also match within the bounds of the initial project Compass findings perfectly. So yea..... I'd suggest going back to the drawing board on this and instead considering that just like atoms, star systems will condense into known patterns regularly rather than infinite variation, simply because those patterns are stable. When we have known analogies with orbital models that form such patterns, why should we be surprised to see it replicated on a macro scale? |

Rena Risalo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 20:43:22 -
[29] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:The Compass 2.5 findings also match within the bounds of the initial project Compass findings perfectly. So yea..... I'd suggest going back to the drawing board on this and instead considering that just like atoms, star systems will condense into known patterns regularly rather than infinite variation, simply because those patterns are stable. When we have known analogies with orbital models that form such patterns, why should we be surprised to see it replicated on a macro scale?
Please learn astrophysics. And quantum physics. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
2171
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 20:58:50 -
[30] - Quote
Rena Risalo wrote: Please learn astrophysics. And quantum physics.
In that case please feel free to show exactly why it's impossible for star systems to form in common patterns. Along with a non time travelling explanation for the aforementioned similar star systems given the depth of project compasses mapping and positioning data using several different forms of verification all giving J space a real space location relative to the Eve cluster. |

Rena Risalo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 21:14:05 -
[31] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Rena Risalo wrote: Please learn astrophysics. And quantum physics.
In that case please feel free to show exactly why it's impossible for star systems to form in common patterns. Along with a non time travelling explanation for the aforementioned similar star systems given the depth of project compasses mapping and positioning data using several different forms of verification all giving J space a real space location relative to the Eve cluster.
If it were as common as you say then we would see duplicate systems in k-space all the time. Show me a bunch of k-space systems that have the same kinds of stars, moons, planets distances etc as one another and i might take you seriously.
As for atomic structures electron clouds are highly chaotic, subject to ionization etc and the paths the electrons take in each atom is different. If you have two oxygen atoms the electrons in the cloud would be in completely different places in different orbits at different times. While both remaining oxygen atoms. The probability of finding two oxygen atoms that arent somehow linked via quantum entanglement having all of their electrons having the same orbit is astronomical.
So the chance of a solar system developing the same star with the same number of planets and moons not just once but over and over and over again is again astronomical in odds. Finding one or a few matching systems could be waved away as coincidence but not over and over and over again having each wormhole space system having a new eden parallel. What you are proposing is not only absurd wishful thinking, it borders on lunacy in the face of the evidence |

Andi Onthatop
Snowlodoto
2
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 21:31:34 -
[32] - Quote
Was brainstorming some and had a thought.
What if when a connection spawns between a two systems, a connection spawns between the mirrors of those two systems?
No real reason to think this, but it wouldn't be hard to verify if you have a hole whose static you can roll, but one would need access to the hole list of mirrors. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
2171
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 21:36:25 -
[33] - Quote
I'm aware of the nature of atoms. However you have neglected to account for their tendency towards shells. Additionally Looking Glass shows a significant number of discrepancies between systems, orbital radii change, planet compositions change, yet somehow retain identical mass and radii themselves despite a massive change in planetary shift...... And the time travel theory is utterly unsupported by any real evidence. It's an interesting co-incidence, but to leap from 'both planets have the same moons' to 'time travel every time we go backwards & forwards' is truly incredible.
If they can produce some independently verifiable science, rather than just survey data, such as a way to show the time shift, then I'll start to take things more seriously.
However we do have data that gives us a real space location of J systems, of which several methods of observation have all generated similar results, including two entirely different groups coming to the same results. Which strongly suggests it's simply a normal wormhole that connects us there. After all I don't recall people claiming gates can be used for time travel, and gates use wormholes as well. |

Radical Divinity
Signal Cartel EvE-Scout Enclave
5
|
Posted - 2015.05.16 22:25:56 -
[34] - Quote
Perhaps when a pilot maneuvers/jumps through a wormhole, they are in fact entering into a simulation. The act of jumping uploads the condensed meta-data of the pilot which, for all intents and purposes, appears to be a seamless transition from one system to another with the wormhole serving as an advanced version of our brain scan technology. I find it disquieting that our behavior within Anoikis (probing, scanning, harvesting data and resources while not engaging in what one could call diplomatic dialogue with the natives) is parallel to the Drifter's behavior currently within our own system.
If Anoikis is a virtual environment, is it an environment to study and establish patterns of communication from alien/foreign civilizations? Are they now merely expressing a dialogue themselves by mirroring our behavior? |

Jaro Essa
Dahkur Forge
29
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 00:10:19 -
[35] - Quote
Will Gauss wrote:Quattras Peione wrote:Second, the name Usi - a system out of which I operated - stuck out, and I noted that there are two J-systems tagged as exact matches for it. I did not notice if this was the case for any others, but it only adds further questions. You are correct. Looking at these two Anoikis systems, they appear to be mirrors of each other as well. In two years of looking at this we didn't notice that. In five hours of it being out in the public you did. This right here is why we just released what we had. J145337J161257
Close. All three systems share the same number of planets and the same distribution of moons, but while J145337's planets are is similar to those in Usi (J145337 III is barren while Usi III is temperate, and J145337 VII is oceanic while Usi III is lava), J161257 is substantially different. The five outer planets are the same type, but the inner three are storm, temperate, lava instead of lava, barren, temperate.
Moreover, J161257 is affected by a nearby red giant, with all the consequent effects on capsuleer systems as seen in other systems affected in such a way, yet J145337 remains untouched. |

Graelyn
Tzedakah Aegis Militia
750
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 00:28:26 -
[36] - Quote
Ah...
Hrm.
Cardinal Graelyn
Owner/Operator, "The Summit"
AM Conclave, Speaker
Amarr Loyalist of the Year - YC113
"Am I losing touch? No. It is the children who are wrong."
|

Odeva Pawen
Aideron Robotics
40
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 00:38:06 -
[37] - Quote
Radical Divinity wrote:Perhaps when a pilot maneuvers/jumps through a wormhole, they are in fact entering into a simulation. The act of jumping uploads the condensed meta-data of the pilot which, for all intents and purposes, appears to be a seamless transition from one system to another with the wormhole serving as an advanced version of our brain scan technology. I find it disquieting that our behavior within Anoikis (probing, scanning, harvesting data and resources while not engaging in what one could call diplomatic dialogue with the natives) is parallel to the Drifter's behavior currently within our own system.
If Anoikis is a virtual environment, is it an environment to study and establish patterns of communication from alien/foreign civilizations? Are they now merely expressing a dialogue themselves by mirroring our behavior?
But how would that explain the existence of sleeper materials in known space? If your theory were true, we would not be able to bring material out of these wormhole systems. No, I believe that the explanation to be simpler than that.
Overheat Keyboards! Load Rage posts! Prepare for a long, seething, back and forth about irrelevant things!
|

Radical Divinity
Signal Cartel EvE-Scout Enclave
5
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 01:25:06 -
[38] - Quote
Quote:But how would that explain the existence of sleeper materials in known space? If your theory were true, we would not be able to bring material out of these wormhole systems. No, I believe that the explanation to be simpler than that.
You're completely correct. Without going into extremes of possible absurdity and manipulation, the more simple answer is no doubt the correct one. It's far safer to err on the side of humility and accept that our fundamental understanding of the Universe may not be correct. |

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
16
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 11:16:43 -
[39] - Quote
Following a suggestion by Frenjo Borkstar of Arek'Jaalan, I altered the matching script to flag systems which are in Jovian space. I was surprised to find that he had been on to something.
This is a full dump of the entire matching set. |

Luna Hanaya
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 11:32:44 -
[40] - Quote
Does it mean that drifters are future us who lack biomass for their new clones?
But really, I believe that the God made our Universe on principle of causality, which would make time travel impossible.
((
If you are a roleplayer, or want to learn about roleplay, please join "Out of Character" and "Intergalactic Summit" channels in game,
Lets show CCP that there are many roleplayers still here, and we want more Live Events!!
))
|

Feu dAstres
Nox Draconum Holding Corp Nox Draconum
47
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 11:43:54 -
[41] - Quote
What of the un-matched systems?
Might they match local systems in known-space to which we do not currently have stargates?
If so, might we be able to reach these systems if we develop the ability ourselves?
These systems might hold further clues to our history previously undisturbed by looters. |

Luna Hanaya
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 11:57:18 -
[42] - Quote
I have just though, what if...
it isn't actually time travel, but rather wormholes are opening towards systems that are similar to ours. Just look at this: these wormholes don't lead to all random systems all around our galaxy, but to a small set.
((
If you are a roleplayer, or want to learn about roleplay, please join "Out of Character" and "Intergalactic Summit" channels in game,
Lets show CCP that there are many roleplayers still here, and we want more Live Events!!
))
|

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
17
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 12:35:34 -
[43] - Quote
Furthermore, based on the observations made by the larger community, I got curious about the multiple matches some were noticing. I took the full dump linked above, and wrote a script that analyzes it to count the frequency by which each system shows up as a match. I was surprised to find that frequency appears logarithmic. I might conjecture that the frequency by which a given system is predictable this way. Anyway, without further conjecture, the data:
Portable Document Format version of the plot
Spreadsheet version of the plot
The graph itself, if uninterested in the whole spreadsheet. |

Frenjo Borkstar
Viziam
70
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 13:06:38 -
[44] - Quote
Since this report was released, i've been working extensively with Mr. Gauss.
The reason that New Eden is visible from Anoikis, is the fact that quantum entanglement of our fluid routers means, that theoretically, they'd be entangled through space OR time, and even if you did travel through time the particles would still remain entangled, and so it would appear, that even if you did move through time (as well as space relative to where New Eden is currently) then you'd get the 'echo' of the current New Eden travelling through time.
But I am currently working extensively with the TerminalDogma team, and am coming up with some interesting results.
Dr. Frenjo Borkstar,
Project Lead for Arek'Jaalan's Project Salus.
|

Farlas Ibana
University of Caille Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 13:45:33 -
[45] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Rena Risalo wrote: Please learn astrophysics. And quantum physics.
In that case please feel free to show exactly why it's impossible for star systems to form in common patterns. Along with a non time travelling explanation for the aforementioned similar star systems given the depth of project compasses mapping and positioning data using several different forms of verification all giving J space a real space location relative to the Eve cluster.
Star systems are currently thought to form from a mass of dust and gas collapsing under its own gravity in the form of a Primitive Solar Nebular.
In order to have two identical systems form independently of each other, the initial PSN would have to be of the same size, the same mass, contain the same constituent materials, and even more unlikely - would need to have those materials with the same spatial distribution AND gravitational collapse effects.
In order to reach this stage, the PSN would then have had to have been formed by the supernova of Identical stars, with identical mass, burn times, and element production cycles. There are simply too many variables which would need to be the same to have any kind of natural formation or repetitive 'clumping' of matter.
Whilst in an infinite universe, this repetition of events is possible, maybe even likely - the chances of having 2 individual systems form identically in a similar area of space which are then connected is just mind-bendingly improbable - let alone a large number of duplicate systems.
There is no way this is a naturally occurring phenomenon. |

Rena Risalo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 14:18:16 -
[46] - Quote
Farlas Ibana wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Rena Risalo wrote: Please learn astrophysics. And quantum physics.
In that case please feel free to show exactly why it's impossible for star systems to form in common patterns. Along with a non time travelling explanation for the aforementioned similar star systems given the depth of project compasses mapping and positioning data using several different forms of verification all giving J space a real space location relative to the Eve cluster. Star systems are currently thought to form from a mass of dust and gas collapsing under its own gravity in the form of a Primitive Solar Nebular. In order to have two identical systems form independently of each other, the initial PSN would have to be of the same size, the same mass, contain the same constituent materials, and even more unlikely - would need to have those materials with the same spatial distribution AND gravitational collapse effects. In order to reach this stage, the PSN would then have had to have been formed by the supernova of Identical stars, with identical mass, burn times, and element production cycles. There are simply too many variables which would need to be the same to have any kind of natural formation or repetitive 'clumping' of matter. Whilst in an infinite universe, this repetition of events is possible, maybe even likely - the chances of having 2 individual systems form identically in a similar area of space which are then connected is just mind-bendingly improbable - let alone a large number of duplicate systems. There is no way this is a naturally occurring phenomenon.
I see people have started to take the potatoes out of their heads.
Now we are getting somewhere. |

Feu dAstres
Nox Draconum Holding Corp Nox Draconum
47
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 16:04:09 -
[47] - Quote
Will Gauss wrote:
I notice they all happen to be shattered systems. Our matching script relies on the star as a starting point, so the events that lead to the shattering of a system would throw off detection. TerminalDogma, with input from the public will be focusing next on a method by which to somehow match these systems and to analyze them for matches.
Might we not use their relative positions to otherwise catalogued systems to predict the also relative locations of un-connected local systems to systems that are connected in our current gate network? |

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
18
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 16:11:34 -
[48] - Quote
Feu dAstres wrote:Will Gauss wrote:
I notice they all happen to be shattered systems. Our matching script relies on the star as a starting point, so the events that lead to the shattering of a system would throw off detection. TerminalDogma, with input from the public will be focusing next on a method by which to somehow match these systems and to analyze them for matches.
Might we not use their relative positions to otherwise catalogued systems to predict the also relative locations of un-connected local systems to systems that are connected in our current gate network?
From what I understand of the question, the old Galileo method of using starbases to measure distance no longer works as of when the shattered systems were discovered. So, we have no idea where physically the shattered systems are and welcome any suggestions as to how this could be determined. |

Feu dAstres
Nox Draconum Holding Corp Nox Draconum
47
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 16:40:07 -
[49] - Quote
How ... inconvenient ...
We will need to direct our employees to construct our own very large arrays and proceed to develop mapping capabilties and databases loyal to capsuleers and not under the control of The Inner Circle.
I have heard the phrase "That's classified." too many times. |

Halfrek Foley
Alexylva Paradox Low-Class
15
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 17:54:24 -
[50] - Quote
Rena Risalo wrote:Esteban Dragonovic wrote:Rosal Milag wrote: J-space was created by some entity for the purpose of planning a galactic invasion.
Yes, there is the massive costs and astronomical, no pun intended, scale of materials needed. If you can create star systems, why would you need to invade new ones? Building them just to simulate invading them is simply not cost efficient. Exactly. What remains is however shocking, whatever the truth turns out to be. Wormholes to a galaxy that just happens to connect to systems that have almost exact matches to our own? Thats too much of a coincidence for me to discount time travel/parallel universe idea. Nothing else really explains it. One thing we could do is try to see where the shattered wormhole systems parallel to (im betting near carolines star) , and where in the j space the eve gate wound up.
New Eden system would be a parallel to J130854. |

Rena Risalo
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 18:31:55 -
[51] - Quote
Halfrek Foley wrote:Rena Risalo wrote:Esteban Dragonovic wrote:Rosal Milag wrote: J-space was created by some entity for the purpose of planning a galactic invasion.
Yes, there is the massive costs and astronomical, no pun intended, scale of materials needed. If you can create star systems, why would you need to invade new ones? Building them just to simulate invading them is simply not cost efficient. Exactly. What remains is however shocking, whatever the truth turns out to be. Wormholes to a galaxy that just happens to connect to systems that have almost exact matches to our own? Thats too much of a coincidence for me to discount time travel/parallel universe idea. Nothing else really explains it. One thing we could do is try to see where the shattered wormhole systems parallel to (im betting near carolines star) , and where in the j space the eve gate wound up. New Eden system would be a parallel to J130854 and J122331.
They do not seem parallel. New eden system has one planet, J130854 has 7 as does J122331. However J122331 and J130854 seem to be parallels to *each other*. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
2185
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 20:10:19 -
[52] - Quote
Farlas Ibana wrote: Whilst in an infinite universe, this repetition of events is possible, maybe even likely - the chances of having 2 individual systems form identically in a similar area of space which are then connected is just mind-bendingly improbable - let alone a large number of duplicate systems.
There is no way this is a naturally occurring phenomenon.
Except they aren't identical. They have the same planet counts and same moon counts. And vaguely the same orbitals. They aren't the same materials on each planet, they aren't identical orbits. So.... they are 'similar'. To actually use the correct word.
Also Thera at least has been measured using Aura's route indicators as a guide and seems to be in the same area of space as the other systems, a mere 1200ly from us. |

Farlas Ibana
University of Caille Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 00:13:39 -
[53] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Farlas Ibana wrote: Whilst in an infinite universe, this repetition of events is possible, maybe even likely - the chances of having 2 individual systems form identically in a similar area of space which are then connected is just mind-bendingly improbable - let alone a large number of duplicate systems.
There is no way this is a naturally occurring phenomenon.
Except they aren't identical. They have the same planet counts and same moon counts. And vaguely the same orbitals. They aren't the same materials on each planet, they aren't identical orbits. So.... they are 'similar'. To actually use the correct word. Also Thera at least has been measured using Aura's route indicators as a guide and seems to be in the same area of space as the other systems, a mere 1200ly from us.
Even so, the similarities are to close to be 'natural'. the previous explanation only put through the first two stages of system formation - and as such I was attempting to simplify the process, and yet show naturally formed similarities simply do not happen. The next stages of planetary development involve planetisimals, accretion and collision. We are basically talking about a game of cosmic pool with bits flying around the 'table', colliding and spinning off in all directions.
Again, there are just too many variables for similar systems of same number of planets and moons, relatively similar orbits. . . . . this added to the earlier requirements of the similarities in PSN. Its just not possible under every law of physics and planetary formation to have such matches occur naturally.
As for the 1200ly apart, it still pretty much in our own back yard when an average galaxy is approx 100,000 ly wide. |

Che Biko
Alexylva Paradox
725
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 15:00:39 -
[54] - Quote
Rena Risalo wrote:Halfrek Foley wrote:New Eden system would be a parallel to J130854 and J122331. They do not seem parallel. New eden system has one planet, J130854 has 7 as does J122331. However J122331 and J130854 seem to be parallels to *each other*. Look at the stars of those systems. and the first planet, and compare them with the New Eden system. I think it's plausible that they are theoretically as similar as the other "twins", and that the EVE Gate may have had something to do with the missing planets.
Coordination Channel for Consolidated Space Rescue Cooperation
Open Letter to the Aidonis Foundation Directorate
|

Soldarius
Naliao Inc. Test Alliance Please Ignore
1277
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 16:47:20 -
[55] - Quote
Will Gauss wrote:Jade Blackwind wrote:Will Gauss wrote:The Declassified ReportFor the safety of New Eden, I have approved the declassification of Project Looking Glass. Neither I nor any other TerminalDogma member will be taking questions at this time. Thank you. Interesting. But what about that simple fact that New Eden is observable from Anoikis? hehe If you guys can figure out an explanation for that, I'd love to see it and I'm looking forward to seeing what the larger scientific community does with this information.
That report (Project Compass 2.5) repeatedly goes on about basic trig, and never once gives any numbers that are not already known, nor even so much as a singel formula demonstrating any of what ti claims. It is completely lacking in any useful scientific or mathematic demonstration of its claim.
Furthermore, the indicators of arc on our visual overlay have only 90 degree indicators, no where near the kind of resolution required to measure fractions of degrees to the second decimal as the writer claims. Therefore any measurements taken in this manner are subject to gross margins of error, and can only be grouped into the realm of pure guess-work.
We also know that there are no fluid routers of any kind in w-space. Thus I can only conclude that Aura is using what information it has and simply outputting its best guess. In the electronics business, we have saying for this phenomenon; garbage in, garbage out.
On the other hand, if the k-space equivalent of J144956 were in a known location, then a temporally adjusted location with the gate jump distances indicated on he visual overlay would make sense. Unfortunately, J144956 was not in the appendix of matched systems.
OP, could we get that matching system in k-space?
http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY
|

Rosal Milag
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2015.05.18 19:55:10 -
[56] - Quote
Attribute the memory loss to boosters or quafe, but can't you still map the shattered wormholes by using a combination of Cynos and the capital navigation window? I don't have the experience to know if a cyno can light in a WH or if the navigation window will give any information for a fleet cyno that is impossible to get |

Will Gauss
TerminalDogma Stain Confederation
21
|
Posted - 2015.05.19 22:01:53 -
[57] - Quote
Rosal Milag wrote:Attribute the memory loss to boosters or quafe, but can't you still map the shattered wormholes by using a combination of Cynos and the capital navigation window? I don't have the experience to know if a cyno can light in a WH or if the navigation window will give any information for a fleet cyno that is impossible to get If this is true I will love you forever because we have no method of mapping the shattered systems onto our existing Galileo map of the rest of Anoikis. I'm sending you 100M if this turns out to work. It'll take us a bit to get set up, but this is beautiful if it does. |

Andi Onthatop
Snowlodoto
2
|
Posted - 2015.05.19 22:51:27 -
[58] - Quote
You said the shattered systems are currently unmatched.
I know that they have no moons, so you can't compare based on the moon numbers, however they do have orbit distances. Have you tried comparing just based on planet orbit distance? |

Stig Elendil
Lords of Fail
0
|
Posted - 2015.05.23 02:57:12 -
[59] - Quote
Will Gauss wrote:Rosal Milag wrote:Attribute the memory loss to boosters or quafe, but can't you still map the shattered wormholes by using a combination of Cynos and the capital navigation window? I don't have the experience to know if a cyno can light in a WH or if the navigation window will give any information for a fleet cyno that is impossible to get If this is true I will love you forever because we have no method of mapping the shattered systems onto our existing Galileo map of the rest of Anoikis. I'm sending you 100M if this turns out to work. It'll take us a bit to get set up, but this is beautiful if it does.
I'm absolutely not a cyno specialist, i'm just a space traveler and went few times in wh. Once in a fleet i had the pleasure and honor to talk with the Fleet Commander that was kindly explaining how (in simple terms) a fleet was working and also the differences between wh (even if i knew few basics). But i asked him a simple question, or should say more a remark, to what he said to the few people that were there with me. it was that remark : "you mean it's impossible to have hotdrop there ?" and he answered me by the affirmative, no such military techniques possible in the wh. As i'm not myself a specialist i can't affirm 100% this is true but coming from a Fleet Commander i think it must be the case. Anyway it's raising others questions : is it possible to light a cyno from a wh to another one ? At the time of my question, shattered ones hadn't appeared and Thera wasn't accessible it could be interesting to test if lighting cyno in shattered ones is possible (of course going to them or just between them) and maybe between shattered ones and usual wh.
My apologies if my answer is raising few other points but i was hoping to help as much as i could. |

Halfrek Foley
Alexylva Paradox Low-Class
15
|
Posted - 2015.05.23 03:08:36 -
[60] - Quote
Stig Elendil wrote:Will Gauss wrote:Rosal Milag wrote:Attribute the memory loss to boosters or quafe, but can't you still map the shattered wormholes by using a combination of Cynos and the capital navigation window? I don't have the experience to know if a cyno can light in a WH or if the navigation window will give any information for a fleet cyno that is impossible to get If this is true I will love you forever because we have no method of mapping the shattered systems onto our existing Galileo map of the rest of Anoikis. I'm sending you 100M if this turns out to work. It'll take us a bit to get set up, but this is beautiful if it does. I'm absolutely not a cyno specialist, i'm just a space traveler and went few times in wh. Once in a fleet i had the pleasure and honor to talk with the Fleet Commander that was kindly explaining how (in simple terms) a fleet was working and also the differences between wh (even if i knew few basics). But i asked him a simple question, or should say more a remark, to what he said to the few people that were there with me. it was that remark : "you mean it's impossible to have hotdrop there ?" and he answered me by the affirmative, no such military techniques possible in the wh. As i'm not myself a specialist i can't affirm 100% this is true but coming from a Fleet Commander i think it must be the case. Anyway it's raising others questions : is it possible to light a cyno from a wh to another one ? At the time of my question, shattered ones hadn't appeared and Thera wasn't accessible it could be interesting to test if lighting cyno in shattered ones is possible (of course going to them or just between them) and maybe between shattered ones and usual wh. My apologies if my answer is raising few other points but i was hoping to help as much as i could.
Yes, it is possible to generate cynosural fields in Anoikis.
|

Iiridayn
Old Spice Syndicate Intrepid Crossing
10
|
Posted - 2015.05.24 02:52:23 -
[61] - Quote
There has been some discussion that Anoikis could be the New Eden cluster in the future, or a universe parallel to our own. I would appreciate sufficient evidence to disprove my personal concern, that Anoikis could be our past before the massive star gate network and station building projects we've engaged in. Certainly the absence of Yan Jung artifacts is suggestive of the counterpoint, as they were contemporaries or possibly predate the Sleepers by archaeological evidence.
With regard to various theories and evidences that the Anoikis cluster may be 1200 ly from New Eden - the Caroline's Star incident has clearly demonstrated that the local space-time fabric is not always following known models with light propagation. Certainly I've never studied our POS systems, autopilot software, or FTL communications, and any or all might be resistant to changes effecting EM radiation. |

Halfrek Foley
Alexylva Paradox Low-Class
15
|
Posted - 2015.05.24 03:53:14 -
[62] - Quote
Iiridayn wrote:There has been some discussion that Anoikis could be the New Eden cluster in the future, or a universe parallel to our own. I would appreciate sufficient evidence to disprove my personal concern, that Anoikis could be our past before the massive star gate network and station building projects we've engaged in. Certainly the absence of Yan Jung artifacts is suggestive of the counterpoint, as they were contemporaries or possibly predate the Sleepers by archaeological evidence.
With regard to various theories and evidences that the Anoikis cluster may be 1200 ly from New Eden - the Caroline's Star incident has clearly demonstrated that the local space-time fabric is not always following known models with light propagation. Certainly I've never studied our POS systems, autopilot software, or FTL communications, and any or all might be resistant to changes effecting EM radiation.
The supposed parallel systems' star ages are exactly the same. That would disprove the time travel theory. |

Random Bacon
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2015.05.25 13:20:26 -
[63] - Quote
Is it not possible that the Sleepers originated in New Eden and over the course of millenia have simply changed their local habitat autonomously?
If you were to use a set space during furor, you would be dependant on that set space. It's not a foreign concept, and it could be that the Sleeper systems look like distant memories of New Eden's cluster through auto-suggestion.
We really don't have too much of an insight into what their machines do, and only a brief acquaintance with the titles of some of their more advanced machinery.
We do know, from Strategic Cruisers, that psychological symbiosis between life and system has taken place, it is also emulated in the strategic cruiser subsystem commands amongst our community today, the number of times there has been mention of memory loss upon destruction of a strategic cruiser is enough to warrant this position.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |