| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zaethiel
Murder-Death-Kill
Blood Raiders Alliance
   |
Posted - 2006.11.12 14:26:00 -
[1]
Should Signal Amplifiers get a boost? Are they underpowered? Overpowered? Just right?
Currently:
Low SLot
CPU: 20
PWgr: 1
Tech 1:
15% longer targeting range
10% Scan resolution
Tech 2:
20% longer targeting range
15% Scan Resolution
_________________________________________
|
Statics
A.W.M
Ka-Tet
|
Posted - 2006.11.12 14:32:00 -
[2]
They need a boost. These things are garbage in their current form.
|
BlackMoon Thrawn
Minmatar
eXceed Inc.
Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.11.12 16:14:00 -
[3]
Yeah, they need a boost. They also allow 1 extra target but that part of the bonuses rarely gets used(in my experiance anyway). I think they should follow the tracking comp/tracking enhancer model. just increase the targeting range on it and lose the +1 target bonus. May need to reduce the scan resolution bonus too but personally I don't think so.
|
Statics
A.W.M
Ka-Tet
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 02:15:00 -
[4]
Wow, lot of interest in this module. Oh wait, nobody uses it because it's garbage. Sweet.
|
D'onryu Shoqui
Vengeance of the Fallen
Imperium Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 02:23:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: BlackMoon Thrawn
Yeah, they need a boost. They also allow 1 extra target but that part of the bonuses rarely gets used(in my experiance anyway). I think they should follow the tracking comp/tracking enhancer model. just increase the targeting range on it and lose the +1 target bonus. May need to reduce the scan resolution bonus too but personally I don't think so.
does the +1 target effect the ships stat? or the users ability?
if its the ships limit maybe it could be useful to someone.
-------------------------
I am a nobody of IMP my views are my own. |
Felix Dzerzhinsky
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 03:31:00 -
[6]
I use them. . .
|
Jan Riksma
Dark Reality
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 10:31:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Jan Riksma on 15/11/2006 10:31:16
i use them it allows me to keep a full tank, scrambler and tank sentries while i have a faster lock and longer targetting range on my raven.
|
James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 11:43:00 -
[8]
Originally by: D'onryu Shoqui
Originally by: BlackMoon Thrawn
Yeah, they need a boost. They also allow 1 extra target but that part of the bonuses rarely gets used(in my experiance anyway). I think they should follow the tracking comp/tracking enhancer model. just increase the targeting range on it and lose the +1 target bonus. May need to reduce the scan resolution bonus too but personally I don't think so.
does the +1 target effect the ships stat? or the users ability?
if its the ships limit maybe it could be useful to someone.
Ships stat. Sometimes handy on stuff like a scorp (assuming you actually bother with multitasking) or frigates and stuff.
But otherwise, these modules are mostly inferior to anything else you might fit in your lows.
|
Old Geeza
The Retirement Home
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 11:58:00 -
[9]
Give them the same targeting range as sensor boosters but a slightly slower targeting time, to minic the relationship between tracking computers and enhancers (same optimal bonus, worse tracking bonus)
_______________________________________
Sign the petition against jump queues! |
D'onryu Shoqui
Vengeance of the Fallen
Imperium Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 12:59:00 -
[10]
no give them the same locking time bonus as a sensor booster 1 but leave there range modifier as it is now 
-------------------------
I am a nobody of IMP my views are my own. |
slothe
Caldari
Forsaken Empire
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 13:54:00 -
[11]
they dont need a great boost but a little would be nice.
all slots for a ship are valuable, why should a mid slot module be so much greater than a low slot?
how about a mid slot damage module that was twice as good as a low? doesnt really make sense does it?
|
Dr Fighter
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 15:49:00 -
[12]
Yeah, mids should do 50% range and lows 50% locking speed
/me hides
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |