Aramendel
Amarr
Queens of the Stone Age
Anarchy Empire
   |
Posted - 2006.11.16 14:34:00 -
[1]
1.) blobs: more smallscale tactical warfare would be very nice and no every side pooling all their ships together.
2.) t2 lottery: we have - what? - about 2-3 times as many people as when t2 was introduced yet the same amount of BPOs. Invention is prolly meant to counteract this, but I honestly do not have high hopes there. If it does not have the desireable effect another attempt to fix it should be made AT ONCE and not in another year.
3.) tier3 BS/racial identity: caldari are right now the only race which has 3 racial concepts (ECM, missiles, rail sniping) going through all ship lvls (sans destroyers/BCs), all other races have at best 2. All tier 3s exept the rohk need a major redesign. The orginal conecpt of them was to introduce something new to the race, not making the other BSs of that race obsolete. The *only* one suceeding there is the Rohk.
4.) The EM damage problem...
5.) Aggression timer for docking/using a stargate: with longer combat it needs to get increased.
6.) Nos: with the HP boosts NOs got more powerful. There are IIRC changes planned but, they were delayed till kali 2. Just do not forget them.
7.) Logging & bubbles: Jumping in a bubble should count as pvp act, resulting in the 15 min timer at logoff, even if you do it while still in cloak.
8.) The EW systems are still not really balanced vs each other: The whole basic concept of ECM is IMO flawed and needs an non-random, non-everything-or-nothing effect, just like the other EW systems. Target painters are a nice tool, but have about the same justification to be called e-war system as webs do.
9.) risk/reward of the mission system: Central empire should be the safest (and get lvl1 missions only), the border regions to 0.0 should be the unsafest and get lvl4 missions). Basically, the higher your mission lvl gets, the more should you have to move down the system sec ladder.
10.) local chat: it just gives too much information. Although without it it's possible you will have too little information. Some change is needed there, but IMO not a flat out removal of local without giving anything in exchange.
|