| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Protunia
Gallente
Horadrim
   |
Posted - 2006.11.17 02:28:00 -
[1]
I dont think the drake needs anymore drone bay!! 
My Character Stats |
Protunia
Gallente
Horadrim
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 02:49:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: LordZer00
The dev's have apparently *never* heard of making small changes... How can you not look at every other MMO that has been released and realize that overreacting while trying to balance completely destroys balance... Just like the 50% hp buff...
When you want to *tweak* something, you change 1 Variable, and you change it in small increments. I have to assume at this point that what they are *testing* is not how to balance Kali, but how much crap their player base will swallow before telling them to shove their game and continue on to the next MMO.
Considering Kali isnt a part of the real game yet I find it funny to see all these people acting like it is.
Its a TEST patch on a TEST server so insteasd of all the whining go test bring back some solid numbers why the changes dont work. Then myabe then you'll get back alittle bit. But if you think by coming here screaming up and down you were robbed that they will change anything I think alot of people are going to find out they are sadly mistaken.
As to wether or not someone cancels their account?? using this or any other small change in a test server as a reason to bail just shows they were headed out the door sooner or later anyways. Bye ;) Can I have yer stuff!!!
My Character Stats |
Protunia
Gallente
Horadrim
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 03:26:00 -
[3]
wasnt exactly just responding to you :) but the whole whine fest i read through.
look everyone here knew they were over powered and yes based on tests. They nerfed because they felt is was just.
If anyone here feels it was wrong go TEST on the TEST server and bring back the hard cold facts about ALL the new BC's after the changes.
Possibly they will change some thing again?? Either way I would much rather have them error on the side of making them less effective than over powered when they come to TQ.
At least then they can fixed without people abusing the set up before hand.
My Character Stats |
Protunia
Gallente
Horadrim
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 10:11:00 -
[4]
you could always change the name to the rake instead ;)
My Character Stats |
Protunia
Gallente
Horadrim
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 22:17:00 -
[5]
As much smack talking as you guys do I'd nerf tyhe SOB's again just for the hell of it ;)
you'll never learn. good luck getting anything back btw. No diplomacy = no buffs.
My Character Stats |
Protunia
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.11.19 06:38:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Imode
Edited by: Imode on 18/11/2006 18:27:01
Originally by: Malthros Zenobia
Originally by: MOS DEF
You guys ask for ownageboats. If the hurricane and drake would'`ve stayed as they were they might as well have deleted the cyclone and ferox because they would be pointless.
It's not the goal of tier 2 BC to render the tier 1 one useless.
How would the Drake make the Ferox useless? Last time i checked, the drake wasn't a longrange railgun boat.
Which is outperformed by an Eagle. It still does a decent job as a sniper boat, with optimal I think out past 150km (pre nerf), but up close it performs best as a missile boat with a very hard tank.
Imo, removing launchers from the Ferox and not gimping the drake is the way to go.
moa - 4 turrets
eagle - 5
ferox - 6
vulture - 7
rokh - 8
Am I alone thinking that a progression like that makes total sense?
The Drake, I'm not sure. I don't think anything was really wrong with the Drake except for the shield bonus and that HAM's coupled with a ROF bonus and oodles of BCU II's are overpowered a tad.
A tad?? heh
My Character Stats |
| |
|