| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pattern Clarc
The Priory
   |
Posted - 2006.11.17 05:38:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 17/11/2006 05:41:19
In order of severity.
1. hyperion (needs a total overhaul)
2. maelstrom (needs a a 7/4 slot layout tbh)
3. myrmidon (needs to either gank more, or tank more)
4. drake (was nerfed the wrong way, needs a tank nerf, not the ghey kin damage bonus)
5. abbadon (it should have a turret damage or cap bonus. both would be needed tbh)
in general
large plates (ala 1600mm's) need to be balanced in fitting req, probably +200pg fitting reqs, or a increased mass.
Tier 3 BS prices need a serious look at
Javlien HAM's need to be nerfed to the stone age (WTF?!)
Sig removed lacks EVE content, email [email protected] if you have any questions - Xorus |
Aeaus
Tabula Rasa Systems
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 06:11:00 -
[2]
I'm going to argue this differently.
1 - Abaddon, Hyperion, Maelstrom
For the simple reason that these new Tier III BSs are pretty much identical to their counterparts. The abaddon is some useness combination of the Apocalypse and Armageddon, the Hyperion is basically a Megathron with less usable grid and tweaked around attributes, the Maelstrom is similarly useless as it has a *tiny* DPS advantage in exchange for a useless bonus (Shield Boost? Come On...)
2 - Myrdidon
What the hell were they thinking? Giving a tanking bonus with so few slots? Giving it no real advantage over the vexor but slightly higher DPS and longativity? This doesn't justify the huge cost of this thing.
3 - Drake
Caldari need a good close-range DPS ship, but instead they killed it's DPS because it was too powerful in combination with the tank it could sustain. Why not simply nerf the powergrid?
4 - Hurricane
Minmatar need a DPS ship (serriously now), same tanking problem that got addressed by removing the DPS.
Last Weeks Signature |
Pattern Clarc
The Priory
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 06:30:00 -
[3]
to be honest, your reasons a probably better  however i never saw the abbadon with such a serious problem.
the tier 3 battleships all need to be looked at with fresh eyes, right now there trying to jam triangels in to square shaped holes...
the myrmidon can be fixed so easily, I just feel the CCP are being stobborn.
The problem with the Cane and Drake, there tanks where too strong, then the CCP decides to gimp there damage??? go figure.
Sig removed lacks EVE content, email [email protected] if you have any questions - Xorus |
Ed Gein
Dark Blade Incorporated
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 07:40:00 -
[4]
I will agree with you about the drake. I really don't follow ccp here. They kept saying that the tier 2 BC's were all about dps, but they let the drake keep its shield res bonus 0_o. Not only that, I am really not a fan of this move on ships where people can fit 3 shield extenders and consider it a good tank. This used to be a joke, but with all the ship changes its now the way to go.
Then the maelstrom, yeah.. CCP keeps saying they want to bring combat to closer ranges, but then keep giving us ships that are meant for arty, and no tackling gear if you want to tank.
--------------------------------------------------------------
What do you call the person that brings a gun to a knife fight?
The Winner. |
MECTO
Xenobytes
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 07:43:00 -
[5]
Edited by: MECTO on 17/11/2006 07:46:22
drake and hurricane nerf are way to go.
and btw raven rof bonus need to be changed to kinetic too.
It's Great Being Carebear in Kali - aint it?
 Originally by: Tuxford
In this picture you might think that Gallente totally pwn. Well they're alright
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |