You got plenty of this, in the SiSi thread. But no dev response in that for weeks...in the thread CCP started....start there.

Yes please include "use classic icons" in options so people can choose what they want.

Not icon color. Just make player ships look more different than npcs. bolder maybe

Can't stand the new icons after all the bad feedback when you guys posted the initial icons. I am shocked that you still went ahead with it. Not sure if anything we actually post or say makes a difference with you guys.

[quote=DHuncan]I logged, undocked, saw the icons, docked back again and logged off.

The statement has already been made: get used to them and come back in 3 days to give positive feedback and cheers.

Star Citizen

I will try it

The tracking camera changes in Carnyx 1.4 seem to have made things much worse as well.
If you zoom out (enough to see the whole tactical overlay disk) and then activate the tracking camera, it flips around and takes a while to decide how to present the camera movement.

Anyone else able to verify that?

Dear CCP,

It is not my habit to post at forum, however the current situation with game UI urges to discuss it.
I have started playing EVE Online roughly two years ago and participated in GÇ£little thingsGÇ¥ voting, which made me think that you still care about players community.

What happens now is really sad. And I do apologize for being not polite.
GÇ£GUI ModernizationGÇ¥ initiative went wrong. In my understanding the root of problem is that new map and overview designers, probably, do not care much about results and their acceptance. Also the phrase GÇ£Quality ControlGÇ¥ sounds like a mockery for me, because at 90% UI scale new icons are the complete mess and just one this fact alone was enough reason to prevent their deployment to TQ.

The new overview is GÇ£fancyGÇ¥. Too excessive and hard to distinguish glyphs. As EVE Online is mostly PVP game I'd prefer more minimalistic approach: to be able to immediately distinguish player's ships, NPCs and celestials at a single look. This worked good with old icons and doesn't work at all with the new ones. Even after a week they were implemented.

Generally speaking, many new UI improvements were not for better:

1) Jump animation
Please, make it optional, like camera shake. Of course, it deserves GÇ£wow!sGÇ¥ at Fanfest, but each every day I make dozens of gate jumps and it causes only negative mood. I'd like to remind you that on many concert DVDs there is a warning printed GÇ£contains stroboscopic effectsGÇ¥, as not 100% of people like watching flashing vertigo. Please, make alternative in graphics options: fade in to black GÇô fade out.

2) Neokom
Old neokom was more compact and more informative. New icons are simply worse.

3) Damage control icon
I have absolutely no idea why it was so necessary to change it.

4) Map
The only advantage of new map is that it can be windowed. All the rest are disadvantages. While scanning with the old map it was perfectly clear where POSes are located and manipulating probes was also easier. Please, do not remove old map.

5) Brackets and icons. They are excessive and inefficient. Please make them optional like a new map.

As far as I understand making simple things GÇ£prettierGÇ¥ is the wrong priority. Revolutionary changes are required to break something old inefficient and to build something more useful. Denying old features noone ever complained about and replacing them with less usable stuff is the mistake. Can you, please, set usability as the main priority for GÇ£UI modernizationGÇ¥ rather than GÇ£fancier lookGÇ¥.

The GÇ£red crossesGÇ¥ are already eponymic, please, bring them back ASAP.

Thanks

The simple answer at the moment is no.

Without going into too much detail as the blog will cover it, we have ideas to simplify the current system from the feedback on this thread and discussions from the CSM.