| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The Newface
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
12
   |
Posted - 2015.06.04 22:46:22 -
[1] - Quote
Current moderation on the forum is in my opinion overly strict and at the same time without any consistency.
The nature of a forum about EVE is that most subjects has been touched before since there is only so much to talk about.
It doesn't promote discussion to have moderators locking threads that touches something that been up before, same thing with making a sticky collection about 10 different subject and locking any thread talking about something that resembles one of these subjects.
for the moderators: im happy to demonstrate this by spending a hour or two some day and just report any subject that's been touched before.
Am all for moderation of rude and offensive posts as well as deliberate spam but let us create subjects with (for this forum) specific suggestion without locking them due to someone touched the area before.
Or create 3 thread and lock the forum
1. ship changes
2. character changes
3 other... |
Paranoid Loyd
5627
|
Posted - 2015.06.04 22:48:35 -
[2] - Quote
INB4L
"Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata
Fix the Prospect!!!
|
Christopher Mabata
The Interstellar Manipulation Consortium
387
|
Posted - 2015.06.04 22:53:07 -
[3] - Quote
you seem to have forgotten that discussing moderation on the forums is grounds for immediete lock of a thread.
CCP has very clear cut rules for forum regulation, they are neither overly strict or suppressive. Instead all of these other threads rehashing everything to death simply clog up the forum and prevent discussion of ideas already in place by pushing them back page after page.
INB4 Lock
GÖú Theory-Crafter GÖú Free Agent GÖú Immortal Space Pirate GÖú "Better the Devil you Know than the devil you don't" -Observing and dismantling F&I Discussion Threads since 2013Gäó
|
The Newface
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2015.06.04 22:59:31 -
[4] - Quote
Christopher Mabata wrote:you seem to have forgotten that discussing moderation on the forums is grounds for immediete lock of a thread.
CCP has very clear cut rules for forum regulation, they are neither overly strict or suppressive. Instead all of these other threads rehashing everything to death simply clog up the forum and prevent discussion of ideas already in place by pushing them back page after page.
INB4 Lock
Not sure if that's right but if it is i find it very funny. If the rules prevent you for discussing changing the rules, thats actually close to the definition of repressive  |
Paranoid Loyd
5627
|
Posted - 2015.06.04 23:02:01 -
[5] - Quote
If you aren't happy with forum moderation, the correct action to take is file a petition.
"Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata
Fix the Prospect!!!
|
Tiddle Jr
Galvanized Inc.
208
|
Posted - 2015.06.04 23:13:18 -
[6] - Quote
Two of my threads been locked by Dorrim. Took 4 weeks to figure that out with support team that me better to submit bug report vs petition strong judgement of Dorrim.
|
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
2460
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 00:07:37 -
[7] - Quote
The Newface wrote:Christopher Mabata wrote:you seem to have forgotten that discussing moderation on the forums is grounds for immediete lock of a thread.
CCP has very clear cut rules for forum regulation, they are neither overly strict or suppressive. Instead all of these other threads rehashing everything to death simply clog up the forum and prevent discussion of ideas already in place by pushing them back page after page.
INB4 Lock Not sure if that's right but if it is i find it very funny. If the rules prevent you for discussing changing the rules, thats actually close to the definition of repressive
CCP is a company enforcing its own standards. If you don't like them, I'm sure you'll be welcome at the dozens of other boards with their own rule sets. |
Christopher Mabata
The Interstellar Manipulation Consortium
387
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 00:22:37 -
[8] - Quote
Rowells wrote:The Newface wrote:Christopher Mabata wrote:you seem to have forgotten that discussing moderation on the forums is grounds for immediete lock of a thread.
CCP has very clear cut rules for forum regulation, they are neither overly strict or suppressive. Instead all of these other threads rehashing everything to death simply clog up the forum and prevent discussion of ideas already in place by pushing them back page after page.
INB4 Lock Not sure if that's right but if it is i find it very funny. If the rules prevent you for discussing changing the rules, thats actually close to the definition of repressive CCP is a company enforcing its own standards. If you don't like them, I'm sure you'll be welcome at the dozens of other boards with their own rule sets.
Bam
A quote for the forum books
GÖú Theory-Crafter GÖú Free Agent GÖú Immortal Space Pirate GÖú "Better the Devil you Know than the devil you don't" -Observing and dismantling F&I Discussion Threads since 2013Gäó
|
FireFrenzy
Satan's Unicorns
432
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 05:40:52 -
[9] - Quote
HEAR HEAR the wisdom of Rowells...
And the moderation load is shared by all, i for one am about to report this thread since it lacks a Feature or an Idea... Well lacking a feature and a GOOD idea;) |
Panty Stocking
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 06:01:35 -
[10] - Quote
I'd urge all the isd's to post in this thread so we can spam likes as support |
ISD Decoy
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
529
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 06:32:09 -
[11] - Quote
I understand where you are coming from, however the spirit of the redundancy rule in my opinion is to focus discussions into single threads. If an idea was suggested in 2006 and hasn't been discussed since then, I don't believe any of us will actually lock it for redundancy.
But when the first couple pages of a board have a subject discussed ad nauseum, we certainly will lock them up and direct them to a single thread.
Regardless, please use the Support Ticket system to discuss moderation issues with our overlords.
Quote:12. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a support ticket under the Community & Forums Category.
Thread locked.
ISD Decoy
Commander
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |