| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nikla Uthaan
Caldari
   |
Posted - 2006.11.20 12:39:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: Jim McGregor
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 19/11/2006 18:51:09
Add nuclear missiles while you are at it. [...]
you should read the flavour text of missles more, the minmataar have already done that.
-----------------
One word,, emo,,,
The Mishing is an ethnic group in the districts of North Lakhimpur, Sonitput, Dhemaji, Dibrugarh, Sibsagar, Jorhat, Golaghat, Tinsukia of Assam. |
Lyria Skydancer
Amarr
Queens of the Stone Age
Anarchy Empire
|
Posted - 2006.11.20 14:44:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Nev Clavain
What's wrong with missile damage as it is?
Do they really need to be made even more versatile?
Personally, I don't like the idea.
Im guessing youre not amarr. Because you'd throw up when you see EM bonus dmg to missiles on a ship. Its a ******* waste because no one in their right mind uses EM missiles.
|
FFGR
Maza Nostra
Euphoria Unleashed
|
Posted - 2006.11.20 14:47:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Old Geeza
Originally by: FFGR
Can missiles also get more damage in the t2 version without any drawbacks ?
Because turret ammo does too? The only turret ammo that had no drawbacks was Barrage and that now has a lovely 25% tracking penalty on it.
Look at T1 and T2 drones and tell me the drawback of using T2 drones instead of T1
_______
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment |
James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.11.20 15:05:00 -
[34]
Originally by: FFGR
Originally by: Old Geeza
Originally by: FFGR
Can missiles also get more damage in the t2 version without any drawbacks ?
Because turret ammo does too? The only turret ammo that had no drawbacks was Barrage and that now has a lovely 25% tracking penalty on it.
Look at T1 and T2 drones and tell me the drawback of using T2 drones instead of T1
When you warp, it's expensive :)
|
James Snowscoran
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.11.20 15:17:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer
Originally by: Nev Clavain
What's wrong with missile damage as it is?
Do they really need to be made even more versatile?
Personally, I don't like the idea.
Im guessing youre not amarr. Because you'd throw up when you see EM bonus dmg to missiles on a ship. Its a ******* waste because no one in their right mind uses EM missiles.
EM missiles are standard outfit on a raven in case you come up against shield tankers.
Not trying to flame or tell you to be happy with the bonuses you get mind you, but EM is n't useless. It's a bad damage type these days because the standard EAN+damage control tanks give armour tankers huge em resist, but I can see why people don't like kinetic as well; it's the primary damagetype coming from both caldari and gallente ships.
-----
|
Lyria Skydancer
Amarr
Queens of the Stone Age
Anarchy Empire
|
Posted - 2006.11.20 16:21:00 -
[36]
Originally by: James Snowscoran
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer
Originally by: Nev Clavain
What's wrong with missile damage as it is?
Do they really need to be made even more versatile?
Personally, I don't like the idea.
Im guessing youre not amarr. Because you'd throw up when you see EM bonus dmg to missiles on a ship. Its a ******* waste because no one in their right mind uses EM missiles.
EM missiles are standard outfit on a raven in case you come up against shield tankers.
Not trying to flame or tell you to be happy with the bonuses you get mind you, but EM is n't useless. It's a bad damage type these days because the standard EAN+damage control tanks give armour tankers huge em resist, but I can see why people don't like kinetic as well; it's the primary damagetype coming from both caldari and gallente ships.
Uhm even ravens armor tank because of EW. Everyone armor tanks, even the shield tankers, wich makes EM even more azz zuck piece of zhit damage type...
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |