|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 85 post(s) |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
105
|
Posted - 2015.06.16 17:11:09 -
[1] - Quote
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:I must admit I'm not a fan of how the market is. Constantly having alliance tournament ship, faction fit pirate battleships and 100 ISK triage carriers dropping on me left and right doesn't exactly feel realistic. Toss in everyone rocking high grade pirate implants...
*sigh*
No way to curb it down a bit before the thing starts?
IDK but it feels pretty normal for PL fleets. We are having to downgrade our fits compared to main server and it makes me feal like a scrub |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
105
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 17:32:29 -
[2] - Quote
Mitnik wrote:7o,
Im having issues telling which alliance is currently winning the node war. I see the colored circle, but i dont see a way to show who is doing what. Am i a scrub and not seeing the correct place, or will such a thing be implemented in the future?
Blue is defending Red is Attacking. |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
105
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 12:00:28 -
[3] - Quote
Warmeister wrote:there goes all the effort
Its fine we only wasted 12h worth of Entosisinginging stuff. :( |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
105
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 10:24:11 -
[4] - Quote
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:CCP Fozzie, for the love of all that is holy; please remove the alliance tournament ships from the market. They are extremely over powered, as they should be, but to have them for free and unlimited is just silly. I have spent a good amount of time trying to help test this new sov system, but this **** is out of control. It breaks all reality of what would be on TQ and completely ***** up everything everywhere. It is challenging enough to deal with Pandemic Legion having all their super carriers and titans in this tiny test pocket, but to be constantly facing AT ships rolling with high grade pirate implants and links... Leaving these on the market was a colossal mistake.
Its no more imbalanced than 100isk Carriers and Dreads. Its in fact not imbalanced at all as every one has access to them.
Maybe you would like then to unseed the systems and just copy over assets from TQ to make it fare? We will still have access to AT ships dreads slowcats and supers and you can run eagles for everything? |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
107
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 19:22:11 -
[5] - Quote
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:[Turns out he is Spectre FC working with PL on their comms to keep us busy while they win nodes. gg And factor in people who can't grasp the idea that during the node capture phase you can no longer form one fleet of the biggest ships possible and brawl in one system on one grid no matter how many times it is explained to them it wont work. Again, gg.
Seems like a thing that could happen on TQ TBH you know ententes not killing each other for a common goal?
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:[The entire environment is saturated with completely unrealistic things that are impossible on TQ now and even after the new sov system happens. PL were in Our normal TQ macs when we did your station last night whatGÇÖs really unrealistic is brave running round in Faction BS and dreads. PL has not done anything that technically we could not do on TQ so far We have AT ships we have dreads carriers and supers on TQ,
SilentAsTheGrave wrote: I would say please stop sending over spies to try and FC us to lose on purpose
ThatGÇÖs some super tinfoil right thereGǪ So to make it fare for you we are only going to come in things we OWN on TQ tonight when we take your stationGǪ just to make it fare for us can you just come in a tengu/eagle fleet like you have on TQ also.
|
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
107
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 21:02:24 -
[6] - Quote
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:If you're so confident you don't need the AT ships to win, support not having the AT ships seeded on Duality.
I dare you.
O no guys he called us out... i guess we should unseed all dreads carriers and faction ships while we are at it.
|
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
107
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 21:43:24 -
[7] - Quote
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:Tappits wrote:SilentAsTheGrave wrote:If you're so confident you don't need the AT ships to win, support not having the AT ships seeded on Duality.
I dare you. O no guys he called us out... i guess we should unseed all dreads carriers and faction ships while we are at it. Not what I said at all. Stop with the straw-man fallacies.
Its not straw-man.... you said it was unrealistic, i said fine lets make it 100% like TQ and now your like no that's not what i asked for....
I just cannot wait till we use our unseeded and officer fitted Adrestia fleet from our AT hanger that we moved down. |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
109
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 22:02:43 -
[8] - Quote
Traxev wrote:SilentAsTheGrave wrote:Tappits wrote:SilentAsTheGrave wrote:If you're so confident you don't need the AT ships to win, support not having the AT ships seeded on Duality.
I dare you. O no guys he called us out... i guess we should unseed all dreads carriers and faction ships while we are at it. Not what I said at all. Stop with the straw-man fallacies. So wait if you if we use it, it is overpowered and shouldn't be seeded. If you use it its fair and balanced and should remain?
I guess he would like us to use ishtars for everything nbd to us. |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
109
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 22:20:28 -
[9] - Quote
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:Traxev wrote:So wait if you if we use it, it is overpowered and shouldn't be seeded. If you use it its fair and balanced and should remain? I never said that either. What is wrong with you guys? Regardless. This has quickly went from simple feedback; me saying the AT ships should be removed to create a more realistic environment, to a PL and Spectre circle jerk CTA.
No we have been saying fine make it realistic and then you say "no that's not what i am saying" when we say yer remove all the dumb stuff, i have no idea what you want... i don't think you know what you want ether. |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
109
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 22:39:41 -
[10] - Quote
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:Tappits wrote:i have no idea what you want... i don't think you know what you want ether. I have been crystal clear from the start and I really don't know how to make it easier to understand: Remove the AT ships.Is that simple enough for you to understand?
Fine... Slowcats supers titans TFI's and Ishtars for the nest few weeks then... have fun. |
|
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
112
|
Posted - 2015.06.27 22:00:13 -
[11] - Quote
Gabriel Karade wrote:Warmeister wrote:Lucas Quaan wrote:And while we're at it, taking sov is still ultimately tied to a single location event when you defend/contest a freshly dropped IHub/TCU. I'm not saying that waiting for that contest is a good strategy for a defender, you do after all lose your current structure and all its benefits, but it is most definitely viable for an opportunist third party attacker that just so happens to be in the area. Why go through all the grinding if you can simply drop the hammer for 20 min at the end?
You do have to work for the station, though. i agree, it hink it'd be better if tcu/ihub followed same mechanics as station. after new tcu/ihub is launched - it should start spawning nodes in the constellation, just like the freeported station. if more than one entity is contesting sov - they should fight for those nodes, rather than trying to put a large blob on the structure itself. ^^
You mad bro?
maybe you could of spent all day grinding thru 80 station nodes with 40-60mins entosis timers on them all day because concord stations are still bugged and have indexes applied to them still.
Its not that bad of a system you just have to protect one area for 12 mins ... were as in TQ sov you have to protect TCU's for 6h. You failed to protect the tcu and decided to put all your forces in bubbles on the in-gate in a non cyno jammed system. |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
114
|
Posted - 2015.06.29 07:55:13 -
[12] - Quote
Sbrodor wrote:i have a couple of question:
1) when a node of reinforcemente spawn have a fix 10 min timer or the timer of this single node is influenced by index? and if by index what index: index of starting reinforce structure in base system or in the system where it spawn itself?
2) to Grath Telkin post i want to ask if this scheme is correct:
blob (considering blob a over 100 member gang?) is still a fact in eve so in field is unthinkable to cycle enthosis with subcapital ship due the impossibility to create a ship not volleyed istant out from grid.
so the escalation to capital ship is still the only option to deploy a ship capable of hold the field for some minuts?
1: You mean the command nodes? Everything is affecting by the indexes if there is any. The system the nodes are for affect them. 2: DonGÇÖt try and use an entosis mod while thereGÇÖs a 100man fleet on grid with you then.
|
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
115
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 17:55:40 -
[13] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Honestly been kicking this around trying to figure out a non poop way to get [-10] into a name, nothing seemed to work our right at all or even come close to looking good, so then i started looking at our name and emblem, the best Ive got as far as sounding non crap I've come up with is the Legion's Viral Entosis Link.
What about the GÇ£Telkin Unstable Entosis link IGÇ¥ A really angry mod that takes a lot of fitting with good range and reasonable cap use and has a 2min 30s cycle time.
CPU 15 Powergrid usage 120 Activation cost 450 Gj Optimal range 150 km Activation time 150 s Meta 4 Stront 1
|
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
115
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 22:55:47 -
[14] - Quote
Elise Randolph wrote:I'm gonna laugh so hard when PL doesn't get a name on any module. Can we make our own lore post tho?
Good keeping our name off the thing that killed eve is a good thing tbh |
|
|
|