| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Omar Alharazaad
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2035
   |
Posted - 2015.06.20 05:51:19 -
[91] - Quote
good lord.
This is not about them,
those guys,
or those guys over there.
This is about the potential glory of watching a capital ship get CONCORDOKKEN'ed.
Also, hilarious killmails due to bad decisions regarding metal scraps.
These are the kinds of things that make this totally worthwhile.
Also removing sticks in high sec too, but you know....
Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1154
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 13:04:24 -
[92] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Bellatrix Invicta wrote:
Bellatrix IS my main.
Kind of proves my point, mate. Your main is a toon that can mindlessly batphone a huge group for help with next to no risk. Carebear. so again...about that "PvP"...
You calling everyone you don't agree with a carebear reminded me of that fat little boy who called everyone "fat", even the skinny kids, because it was the one insult he was familiar with and that hurt him the most.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Bellatrix Invicta
New Order Logistics
CODE.
24
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 14:00:28 -
[93] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Bellatrix Invicta wrote:
Bellatrix IS my main.
Kind of proves my point, mate. Your main is a toon that can mindlessly batphone a huge group for help with next to no risk. Carebear. so again...about that "PvP"...
Only it kinda doesn't. You keep using this "batphone" term. I don't think it means what you think it means. Can we arrange a freighter fleet at the drop of a hat? **** yeah. Know why? Lots of us love blowing up internet spaceships.
Even more of us adore harvesting your tears.
We don't need a "batphone".
And next to no risk? That's what happens when you're good at what you do. /shrug Try it sometime.
If you think you've won, think again.
The CODE always wins.
|
John E Normus
The Conference Elite
CODE.
563
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 15:59:26 -
[94] - Quote
capitals into highsec thread becomes CODE thread.
hahahahaha
All this thread needs now is a touch of Veers...
Between Ignorance and Wisdom
|
Grinder2210
Most Unknown
42
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 17:22:58 -
[95] - Quote
Rexxorr wrote:I'am positive I could find a use for them in lvl 4s. 
Surely CCP would be smart and lock Caps outta lvl 4's
However i would give them a chance to make new Capital only missions Could be fun |
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1162
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 17:35:00 -
[96] - Quote
John E Normus wrote:capitals into highsec thread becomes CODE thread.
hahahahaha
All this thread needs now is a touch of Veers...
John! You look really elite now with this googles. Or maybe it's because of the corp...
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Yazzinra
Scorpion Ventures
74
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 19:24:13 -
[97] - Quote
Posting in this thread, again. |
Dasha D'andria
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 20:23:09 -
[98] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
What's stopping you from going to null? I must be missing something. |
Marsha Mallow
2231
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 20:43:21 -
[99] - Quote
Dasha D'andria wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see What's stopping you from going to null? I must be missing something.
What's stopping you from posting on your main?
If you are going to smack, hiding behind an NPC alt actually validates his remark in some ways.
Although I think 'nullpussy' has a nicer ring than 'nulldog' myself.
Solecist Project wrote: See, the issue isn't the rubbing
ISD Ezwal wrote: Nope, no one will get banned for 'rubbing'
Benny Ohu wrote: fire up the argument calibrators set phasers to outraged overheat keyboards reinforce the thread
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1205
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 21:50:03 -
[100] - Quote
Dasha D'andria wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see What's stopping you from going to null? I must be missing something.
nothing stopped me, you must be hiding under a big rock if you did not see me yet
YouTube
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2615
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 01:08:06 -
[101] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Your factually wrong, pvp is player vs player ie 2 or more player engaged in combat together, these sort of things are like racing just because im on the road in my racecar and overtake a tractor it does not mean i won the race. Because the tractor was just driving on the road not racing
I understand the point you're making, and I understand why you are making it. You don't like ganking because it's not in-keeping with the artificially narrow and absurd definition of PVP you've come up with to inflate your own ego.
"Ganking isn't honorable combat between equal combatants, therefore it is not combat at all." or something like that is your line of reasoning. This allows you to think that you're in some way superior to gankers because you do real PVP and they don't. It's utterly transparent and a load of horse crap.
You can dislike ganking and feel superior to gankers as much as you like if that's what gets you hard, but no amount of wishful thinking on your part will make ganking anything other than an inherently PVP activity. Sorry about that. |
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
That Escalated Quickly.
1613
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 06:05:12 -
[102] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
If that ever happens we would harest you high sec dwellers like ripe grapes.
TunDraGon is recruiting!
"Also, your boobs [:o] " -á
CCP Eterne, 2012
"When in doubt...make a di++k joke."-áRobin Williams - RIP
|
Asuka Solo
Knights of Azrael
Circle-Of-Two
2968
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 10:04:19 -
[103] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully soon.
These are ships that also belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed.
Fixed.
Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!
|
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
3688
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 10:14:56 -
[104] - Quote
Bad idea imo.
Oh god.
|
Pryce Caesar
Evil Young Flesh
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 18:01:08 -
[105] - Quote
If there was any intention on the part of the CCP to allow Capital ships into High-Sec space, I do believe that it would be because of what is going on right now with the Drifters/Sleepers. They are connected to the Jove in some way, and I do recall reading the lore about the Jovian Motherships. What if the Sleepers have their own collection of Capital Ships (even Dreadnought and Titan-class Capitals), and Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers? |
BF Guardian
AirHogs
Zulu People
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 08:13:43 -
[106] - Quote
As someone who has both spend a considerable amount of time as a 'carebear', and a lot of time flying capitals in low/null I can say I think this would be a VERY bad change.
This would mean that people could store capitals in highsec at next to no risk, most of the challenge would be removed from missions etc.
The idea of capitals is that they wield enormous benefits to the people that own them, but they are also a challenge to keep alive, and are attractive targets.
There is no reason to let capitals in highsec.
Even to buy/sell them. If you want a capital you have to scan the market, assess the risk, find and buy one and safely get it to its destination.
It SHOULD NOT be as easy as going to jita and back, keeping to highsec apart from the last 2 jumps which you just cyno over as this eliminates all the risk of moving a capital. |
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
3692
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 09:30:21 -
[107] - Quote
Pryce Caesar wrote:Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers?
Does it involve generating vast amounts of ISK out of nothing?
Oh god.
|
Harrison Tato
Yamato Holdings
401
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 09:48:42 -
[108] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Your factually wrong, pvp is player vs player ie 2 or more player engaged in combat together, these sort of things are like racing just because im on the road in my racecar and overtake a tractor it does not mean i won the race. Because the tractor was just driving on the road not racing I understand the point you're making, and I understand why you are making it. You don't like ganking because it's not in-keeping with the artificially narrow and absurd definition of PVP you've come up with to inflate your own ego. "Ganking isn't honorable combat between equal combatants, therefore it is not combat at all." or something like that is your line of reasoning. This allows you to think that you're in some way superior to gankers because you do real PVP and they don't. It's utterly transparent and a load of horse crap. You can dislike ganking and feel superior to gankers as much as you like if that's what gets you hard, but no amount of wishful thinking on your part will make ganking anything other than an inherently PVP activity. Sorry about that.
Everybody knows the real PVP is hot solo on solo frigate action! |
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
829
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 09:50:26 -
[109] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Your factually wrong, pvp is player vs player ie 2 or more player engaged in combat together, these sort of things are like racing just because im on the road in my racecar and overtake a tractor it does not mean i won the race. Because the tractor was just driving on the road not racing I understand the point you're making, and I understand why you are making it. You don't like ganking because it's not in-keeping with the artificially narrow and absurd definition of PVP you've come up with to inflate your own ego. "Ganking isn't honorable combat between equal combatants, therefore it is not combat at all." or something like that is your line of reasoning. This allows you to think that you're in some way superior to gankers because you do real PVP and they don't. It's utterly transparent and a load of horse crap. You can dislike ganking and feel superior to gankers as much as you like if that's what gets you hard, but no amount of wishful thinking on your part will make ganking anything other than an inherently PVP activity. Sorry about that.
again you're wrong, i like ganking, have no issue with it really and often gatecamp myself and will gank anything for fun, i just do not class it as pvp just simply ganking.
However the only egos that get inflated are those who think they are superior to the gank victims and ram pvp down the their throats like they are trying to make out it was some sort of fair fight. just get on with it
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1206
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 11:03:49 -
[110] - Quote
Pryce Caesar wrote:If there was any intention on the part of the CCP to allow Capital ships into High-Sec space, I do believe that it would be because of what is going on right now with the Drifters/Sleepers. They are connected to the Jove in some way, and I do recall reading the lore about the Jovian Motherships. What if the Sleepers have their own collection of Capital Ships (even Dreadnought and Titan-class Capitals), and Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers?
that would be what the game really needs, big capital fights in highsec against an alien force where everybody can join easy, so all the newcomers to eve know right away what this game is about... why hide those big fights in deep nullsec only, there could be gigantic PVE warzones in highsec each day where thousand of ships battle to their bones, this is what the people want and this would bring a real turnaround to the game
YouTube
|
Lord LazyGhost
Bear Bones Brigade
The Bastards.
494
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 11:09:04 -
[111] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Pryce Caesar wrote:If there was any intention on the part of the CCP to allow Capital ships into High-Sec space, I do believe that it would be because of what is going on right now with the Drifters/Sleepers. They are connected to the Jove in some way, and I do recall reading the lore about the Jovian Motherships. What if the Sleepers have their own collection of Capital Ships (even Dreadnought and Titan-class Capitals), and Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers? that would be what the game really needs, big capital fights in highsec against an alien force where everybody can join easy, so all the newcomers to eve know right away what this game is about... why hide those big fights in deep nullsec only, there could be gigantic PVE warzones in highsec each day where thousand of ships battle to their bones, this is what the people want and this would bring a real turnaround to the game
Yer i would like to spend 5hours in a fleet playing Slide Show online |
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1206
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 11:15:27 -
[112] - Quote
Lord LazyGhost wrote:Harry Forever wrote:Pryce Caesar wrote:If there was any intention on the part of the CCP to allow Capital ships into High-Sec space, I do believe that it would be because of what is going on right now with the Drifters/Sleepers. They are connected to the Jove in some way, and I do recall reading the lore about the Jovian Motherships. What if the Sleepers have their own collection of Capital Ships (even Dreadnought and Titan-class Capitals), and Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers? that would be what the game really needs, big capital fights in highsec against an alien force where everybody can join easy, so all the newcomers to eve know right away what this game is about... why hide those big fights in deep nullsec only, there could be gigantic PVE warzones in highsec each day where thousand of ships battle to their bones, this is what the people want and this would bring a real turnaround to the game Yer i would like to spend 5hours in a fleet playing Slide Show online
blocked, only for core gamers
YouTube
|
Aleccia Kashada
Perkone
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 14:56:06 -
[113] - Quote
I don't care about capital ships, can we just have carriers? I want a nyx please, that I can float around highsec in. |
Pryce Caesar
Evil Young Flesh
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 18:17:27 -
[114] - Quote
Aleccia Kashada wrote:I don't care about capital ships, can we just have carriers? I want a nyx please, that I can float around highsec in.
Carriers ARE capital ships. It is just one of the other classes of capital ship alongside Dreadnoughts and Titans.
Either way, from what I've seen, if the Sleeper presence in High-Sec amounts to something that drastically changes High-Sec New Eden, and they have all three classes of Capital Ships (Dreadnought, Carrier, Titans) then I could foresee Capitals made available in High-sec in the future.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |