| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1180
   |
Posted - 2015.06.18 11:58:10 -
[1] - Quote
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/phoebe-travel-change-update/
"WeGÇÖd like to allow capitals into highsec without restriction in the future, but itGÇÖs a major change that is for a later time. For now, this maintains the status quo in highsec."
when exactly will this happen? ...need to start training for my Leviathan
thats probably the best change that will happen, looking forward to those Titan duels infront of Jita Station
YouTube
|
Stacy Lone
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
103
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:05:11 -
[2] - Quote
Probably not before a capital rebalance. |
Arkady Romanov
Hole Violence
Whole Squid
582
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:18:33 -
[3] - Quote
Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis.
Whole Squid: Get Inked.
|
baltec1
Bat Country
Goonswarm Federation
16237
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:19:49 -
[4] - Quote
Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis.
Indeed.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1180
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:24:08 -
[5] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed.
you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
YouTube
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
23957
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:24:58 -
[6] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. Although watching people lose them to Concord because they forgot about hisec aggression rules would be amusing.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1180
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:28:08 -
[7] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. Although watching people lose them to Concord because they forgot about hisec aggression rules would be amusing.
the only thing amusing will be your ships popping at the entrance to highsec, cause all you redflaged chicken will get doomsdayed
YouTube
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:28:39 -
[8] - Quote
Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis.
At the same time allowing dreads in highsec would help undo the nigh-unassailability of defended highsec POS towers.
I think if capitals ate ever to be allowed in highsec serious considerations have to be made on giving them weapons timers for entering triage or siege modes like marauders do when going in to bastion. |
Arkady Romanov
Hole Violence
Whole Squid
582
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:30:05 -
[9] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
Who is this "we" you speak of?
Considering that the only people in EVE that don't oppose or outright hate Goons are people who've somehow managed to play EVE while living under a rock for the past 9 years, you'd think there'd be an armada out there just waiting to burn us off the map. But nope.
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
At the same time allowing dreads in highsec would help undo the nigh-unassailability of defended highsec POS towers.
I'd much rather a significant reduction in shield/armor HP for highsec POS. What does a POS in highsec need all that for when they've got CONCORD to protect them?
Whole Squid: Get Inked.
|
Avaelica Kuershin
Paper Cats
174
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:30:10 -
[10] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
Are you sure they'd be willing to venture into low or null with the shiny new capitals?
At present, people do work in High sec and still have capitals based in low or null.
What's to stop high-sec people from using a forward operating base?
|
Yang Aurilen
The Mjolnir Bloc
The Bloc
681
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:33:47 -
[11] - Quote
Avaelica Kuershin wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see Are you sure they'd be willing to venture into low or null with the shiny new capitals? At present, people do work in High sec and still have capitals based in low or null. What's to stop high-sec people from using a forward operating base?
They will unironically mine in cargo expanded Revelations with orca support.
Post with your NPC alt main and not your main main alt!
|
Arkady Romanov
Hole Violence
Whole Squid
582
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:36:06 -
[12] - Quote
Pretty sure Chribba has used one of his titans for mining before.
Whole Squid: Get Inked.
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1181
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:37:11 -
[13] - Quote
Avaelica Kuershin wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see Are you sure they'd be willing to venture into low or null with the shiny new capitals? At present, people do work in High sec and still have capitals based in low or null. What's to stop high-sec people from using a forward operating base?
they will follow me, cleaning the streets, 1000 carriers will jump in and blob everything on its way
we'll do it every sunday, bloody sunday... during the week nullsec can rebuild their stuff
YouTube
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:39:47 -
[14] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
No. People don't like the idea of capitals being combined with the virtual invulnerability that can be achieved in highsec.
Really I don't think that's an issue related to capitals, rather that there are too few ways to kill things in highsec. |
baltec1
Bat Country
Goonswarm Federation
16238
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:40:16 -
[15] - Quote
Arkady Romanov wrote:Pretty sure Chribba has used one of his titans for mining before.
He has all 4.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1181
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:46:32 -
[16] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see No. People don't like the idea of capitals being combined with the virtual invulnerability that can be achieved in highsec. Really I don't think that's an issue related to capitals, rather that there are too few ways to kill things in highsec.
its the fear they got to see somebody else with the same weapons, why would they bother if it is not their angst highsec will attack them with their ships... they are scared I can smell it... fleet changes, captitals jumping through gates... what do you think this will be? its the masterplan to destroy nullsec and rebuild it... time to burn out those caves
YouTube
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:47:27 -
[17] - Quote
You're pretty dim, huh? |
Milla Jjovovich
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:47:47 -
[18] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
no worry, you highseccers wouldnt know what to do with a capital
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
23960
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:50:48 -
[19] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:You're pretty dim, huh? It's either that or he completely misunderstands most of the people he wants to lead in a glorious revolution against the evil nullsec empires.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:54:48 -
[20] - Quote
Milla Jjovovich wrote:
no worry, you highseccers wouldnt know what to do with a capital
I know exactly what I'd do with one.
Neutral triage reps. |
Milla Jjovovich
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:00:35 -
[21] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Milla Jjovovich wrote:
no worry, you highseccers wouldnt know what to do with a capital
I know exactly what I'd do with one. Neutral triage reps.
magic mushroom doomsday death to neutral triage ;)
|
Aralyn Cormallen
Wildly Inappropriate
Goonswarm Federation
1180
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:09:00 -
[22] - Quote
You know what would be fun; let capitals in, but make them go auto-suspect  |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:10:19 -
[23] - Quote
I'd generally consider losing a carrier to a neutral DD less likely than losing a regular logistics ship to neutrals due to no Cynos in highsec, capitals being slow and combat requiring logistics of any kind often occurring in fairly low population places.
A random pirate battleship fleet with bhaalgorns in it would be more likely threat to a neutral triage carrier.
Plus a fitted triage carrier is only about as expensive as one of our nestors. |
David Therman
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
74
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:30:47 -
[24] - Quote
Station games would never be the same again. |
Tsakir Pan
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:40:49 -
[25] - Quote
I know the day they are going to allow Caps in high sec.
It will the be same day they will re-open CAOD.
Never |
Wacktopia
Noir.
No Not Believing
795
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:44:02 -
[26] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Pretty sure Chribba has used one of his titans for mining before. He has all 4.
+a rev.
Kitchen sink? Seriousy, get your ship together - -áFleet-Up.com
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1181
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:44:19 -
[27] - Quote
Tsakir Pan wrote:I know the day they are going to allow Caps in high sec.
It will the be same day they will re-open CAOD.
Never
it's out of question that they will do it, it was mentioned to be on the agenda, all recent changes are in line with this direction
YouTube
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2568
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:47:38 -
[28] - Quote
Between blap dreads and the massive corp hanger/ship maintenance bay on a carrier things would get really funky really fast.
Orca shenanigans would look like a joke by comparison. |
Nicholas Kirk
GFL
Gentlemen's.Parlor
3
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 14:16:47 -
[29] - Quote
Yang Aurilen wrote:Avaelica Kuershin wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see Are you sure they'd be willing to venture into low or null with the shiny new capitals? At present, people do work in High sec and still have capitals based in low or null. What's to stop high-sec people from using a forward operating base? They will unironically mine in cargo expanded Revelations with orca support.
You mean rorqual support as they could come too lol |
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1148
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 15:27:09 -
[30] - Quote
Finally, some new gank targets for loyal. I am sure highsec carebears will waste no time to shitfit them and go afk
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Otso Bakarti
Filial Pariahs
264
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 15:43:40 -
[31] - Quote
You guys are just skeered you put all that time and effort into a pixel config that got dumped ultimately.
As you guys like to tell us poor lowbies, "It happens. Deal with it."Ima Wreckyou wrote:Finally, some new gank targets for loyal. I am sure highsec carebears will waste no time to shitfit them and go afk What're you, a miner? Only miners talk like this. 
I survived Win95
|
Hiyora Akachi
Perkone
Caldari State
226
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 15:44:19 -
[32] - Quote
Sure, let caps into HS.
Just exempt them from being protected by Concord and don't let them dock. They can only use HS for travel, not storage or safety. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2576
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 15:47:33 -
[33] - Quote
Otso Bakarti wrote:You guys are just skeered you put all that time and effort into a pixel config that got dumped ultimately.
As you guys like to tell us poor lowbies, "It happens. Deal with it."
What does that even mean? |
Natalia Abre-Kai
12
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 15:53:55 -
[34] - Quote
I can see it now..... AFK autopilot in an Archon |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2578
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 16:20:44 -
[35] - Quote
Afk autopiloting an archon full of all of your stuff. It will happen. |
Fleischgewehr
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
21
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 16:21:59 -
[36] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see No. People don't like the idea of capitals being combined with the virtual invulnerability that can be achieved in highsec. Really I don't think that's an issue related to capitals, rather that there are too few ways to kill things in highsec. its the fear they got to see somebody else with the same weapons, why would they bother if it is not their angst highsec will attack them with their ships... they are scared I can smell it... fleet changes, captitals jumping through gates... what do you think this will be? its the masterplan to destroy nullsec and rebuild it... time to burn out those caves
Aren't you the guy sitting in a purifier on gates in Dec' and launching bombs on haulers (stuff that does not shoot back) ? :)
Anyway anyone is welcome to attack us "evil" goons anytime, we like the content, especially cap fights !
Enough feeding the troll. |
Paranoid Loyd
5848
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 16:32:30 -
[37] - Quote
Fleischgewehr wrote:Aren't you the guy sitting in a purifier on gates in Dec' and launching bombs on haulers (stuff that does not shoot back) ? :)
Anyway anyone is welcome to attack us "evil" goons anytime, we like the content, especially cap fights !
Enough feeding the troll. Heh, check MyEve for his thread there.
"Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata
Fix the Prospect!!!
|
stoicfaux
5915
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 16:47:30 -
[38] - Quote
Arkady Romanov wrote:Pretty sure Chribba has used one of his titans for mining before.
But has he paid his CODE permit? If not, then CODE is a joke.
Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1182
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 17:21:06 -
[39] - Quote
Fleischgewehr wrote:
Aren't you the guy sitting in a purifier on gates in Dec' and launching bombs on haulers (stuff that does not shoot back) ? :)
Anyway anyone is welcome to attack us "evil" goons anytime, we like the content, especially cap fights !
Enough feeding the troll.
sure, last time I bombed a jackdaw a hauler popped right with it, I see on your killboard you prefer shooting structures, not as exciting for sure, sorry
YouTube
|
Grinder2210
Most Unknown
39
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 17:29:04 -
[40] - Quote
+ 3 for caps in Highsec 
After all we need some way to kill drifters besides useing a POS tower right  |
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1184
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 17:48:25 -
[41] - Quote
Grinder2210 wrote:+ 3 for caps in Highsec After all we need some way to kill drifters besides useing a POS tower right
too bad I did not read your post before I just shot one of those drifters not knowing what they are and got volleykilled :D
YouTube
|
Anddo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 18:45:12 -
[42] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Finally, some new gank targets for loyal. I am sure highsec carebears will waste no time to shitfit them and go afk
Ironic, coming from someone in one of the more well known carebear alliances in the game... |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2328
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 19:01:24 -
[43] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/phoebe-travel-change-update/
"WeGÇÖd like to allow capitals into highsec without restriction in the future, but itGÇÖs a major change that is for a later time. For now, this maintains the status quo in highsec."
o.O
Just do it(tm). Do it naow.
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Joe Atei
Aes Dei Asher
14
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 19:58:04 -
[44] - Quote
I would totally purchase a couple of capitals to help purge high sec of undefended POSs |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2586
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 21:59:25 -
[45] - Quote
There would be a massive drop in the price of POS bash contracts. |
Hicksimus
Xion Limited
Resonance.
654
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 00:30:34 -
[46] - Quote
Put jump beacons in the noob starter systems so that we can give our new friends a good show....some aspirations.
Recruitment Officer: What type of a pilot are you?
Me: I've been described as a Ray Charles with Parkinsons and a drinking problem.
|
Rexxorr
Zero Corp Tax3
87
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 01:26:58 -
[47] - Quote
I'am positive I could find a use for them in lvl 4s.  |
GankYou
Redshield Holding Company
554
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 01:28:36 -
[48] - Quote
Capitals in Hisec is a can of worms, nonetheless with great review to the whole capitalship concept, it could also open a way for Drifter Hisecks invasions dropping the security status of the systems they are active in to <0.4. 
...And They All Crave One Thing - ISK. Gÿ+
Nullsec Ore Changes - Lowend Mineral Price Tracking [2015]
|
Cyborg Girl86
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
58
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 02:44:53 -
[49] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
Unfortunately, the fact is that most of the people in HS probably couldn't organize a feces-throwing contest in a monkey enclosure. |
Tiddle Jr
Galvanized Inc.
243
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 04:18:44 -
[50] - Quote
OP heavy troller not sure why not locked yet. As well as redundant proposal. |
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1190
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 05:24:22 -
[51] - Quote
Tiddle Jr wrote:OP heavy troller not sure why not locked yet. As well as redundant proposal.
it's not redundant neither a proposal, its mentioned to be added to the game by the devs... link was attached
it would help you read the thread before commenting
YouTube
|
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
247
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 06:19:37 -
[52] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
Nice Joke!
But is is easier to organize a bag of cats than a reasonable amount of hisec dwellers.
stoicfaux wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Pretty sure Chribba has used one of his titans for mining before. But has he paid his CODE permit? If not, then CODE is a joke.
CODE IS a joke...
"Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time."
Forum Main
|
Tiddle Jr
Galvanized Inc.
243
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 06:48:53 -
[53] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:
it's not redundant neither a proposal, its mentioned to be added to the game by the devs... link was attached
it would help you read the thread before commenting
there a few words which you probably have missed: future; major; change; later. |
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1190
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 07:13:13 -
[54] - Quote
Tiddle Jr wrote:Harry Forever wrote:
it's not redundant neither a proposal, its mentioned to be added to the game by the devs... link was attached
it would help you read the thread before commenting
there a few words which you probably have missed: future; major; change; later.
thats, why, I, ask, when,
understand now you do?
YouTube
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1190
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 07:16:30 -
[55] - Quote
La Rynx wrote:Harry Forever wrote:you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see Nice Joke! But is is easier to organize a bag of cats than a reasonable amount of hisec dwellers. stoicfaux wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Pretty sure Chribba has used one of his titans for mining before. But has he paid his CODE permit? If not, then CODE is a joke. CODE IS a joke...
better a bag of cats, than a bag of nullsecpigs :P
YouTube
|
Barrogh Habalu
Forever Winter
Absolute Zero.
868
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 09:14:31 -
[56] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
I fail to see how Hisec restrictions stop you from bringing heavy ships into Low / Null.
Wait, it's Harry forever. I mean, you're not overly serious, right? |
Tiddle Jr
Galvanized Inc.
243
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 09:26:11 -
[57] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:
thats, why, I, ask, when,
understand now you do?
i have found it for you (not even used a magic stick)
The future
GÇ£And with the force projection changes, we're starting of course earlier that we had maybe planned before to touch sovereignty and so on, and we will just keep rolling with this, in the phases that we're outlined in the devblog about the long-distance travel changes, and I'll just recap them here. The first phase is the changes we are shipping now in Phoebe, and the phase coming after that, which is really starting in 2015 right away, is real changes to nullsec space holding and infrastructure, and as soon as we get to more interesting pieces GÇö we have plans for revamping corporations, alliances, structures, and so on GÇö we also start building towards more ambitious changes to the sandbox gameplay GÇö more things to do, more player-driven infrastructure, just more interesting pieces to play with, with the overall goal to create more things to do for everything from the solo person to small groups, bigger diversity of small groups, as well as the megagroups that you guys organize. So, phase three is really about combining all the new stuff we want to do into a next level of sandbox gameplay in EVE Online.GÇ¥
-Executive Producer CCP Seagull, EVE Vegas 2014 |
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
247
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 09:27:57 -
[58] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:
better a bag of cats, than a bag of pathetic *** :P
So your sweet Titans would be safe since CONCORDE would intervene before it can be destroyed, hmmm?
Those ships are for SOV Powerprojection.
In Hisec the is no Powerprojection possible, since CONCORDE kicks your butt.
That is the reason why CODE. is so pathetic.
If you feel so cool and strong, stop trolling and come to visit in your best ship!
I am sure there can be a firery welcome party arranged, with some fireworks! (that would be your ship)
You want a titan? come to us sweety...
"Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time."
Forum Main
|
Vek Hareka
Fist Bumps All Around
39
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 09:32:11 -
[59] - Quote
Cyborg Girl86 wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see Unfortunately, the fact is that most of the people in HS probably couldn't organize a feces-throwing contest in a monkey enclosure.
I'm stealing that, OK ? I'm sorry, I must have it. Please forgive me.
OT: let's keep capitals out of high-sec, OK ? The mess would be biblical in proportions. Plus I'm not sure the empires would be willing to allow such a heavy ordinance use for capsuleers so close to their farmsteads.
Here comes a time, ganker,
When blingfits cease to sparkle,
When hermophite looses its luster,
When the station hangar becomes a prison
And all that is left is a capsuleer's love for his fedo.
|
Vek Hareka
Fist Bumps All Around
39
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 10:12:12 -
[60] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Grinder2210 wrote:+ 3 for caps in Highsec After all we need some way to kill drifters besides useing a POS tower right too bad I did not read your post before I just shot one of those drifters not knowing what they are and got volleykilled :D
You mean https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=430503 ?
Is this why you push for caps in HS ?
... Because Drifters shoot caps too, you know ?
Here comes a time, ganker,
When blingfits cease to sparkle,
When hermophite looses its luster,
When the station hangar becomes a prison
And all that is left is a capsuleer's love for his fedo.
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1192
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 10:44:22 -
[61] - Quote
Vek Hareka wrote:Harry Forever wrote:Grinder2210 wrote:+ 3 for caps in Highsec After all we need some way to kill drifters besides useing a POS tower right too bad I did not read your post before I just shot one of those drifters not knowing what they are and got volleykilled :D You mean https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=430503 ? Is this why you push for caps in HS ? ... Because Drifters shoot caps too, you know ?
na that happend after I read about the caps in highsec, there is no need to push for it, the devs have already mentioned that it is on the agenda and they want to do it... I was just asking if somebody knows the timeline for that, to assure I finished training for the ships as soon as it is live
still battling the drifter with some caps in highsec would certainly be more fun then getting popped with just one strike
YouTube
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1192
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 10:47:49 -
[62] - Quote
Barrogh Habalu wrote:Harry Forever wrote:you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see I fail to see how Hisec restrictions stop you from bringing heavy ships into Low / Null. Wait, it's Harry forever. I mean, you're not overly serious, right?
you know the difference between caps and battleships right? why would highsec go there with battleships if you have the caps waiting for them... with the change now it will be an even fight and thats what nullsec wanted to prevent
YouTube
|
Anddo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:02:26 -
[63] - Quote
La Rynx wrote:Nice Joke! But is is easier to organize a bag of cats than a reasonable amount of hisec dwellers. stoicfaux wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Pretty sure Chribba has used one of his titans for mining before. But has he paid his CODE permit? If not, then CODE is a joke. CODE IS a joke...
No, they are just carebears who can't PvP, so they do what they do instead. Worse than mining, really. |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
11441
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:09:01 -
[64] - Quote
Capitals in High Sec are alright by me so long as you can't fly one in high sec while being a member of an npc corp. |
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation
That Escalated Quickly.
815
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:09:24 -
[65] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Barrogh Habalu wrote:Harry Forever wrote:you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see I fail to see how Hisec restrictions stop you from bringing heavy ships into Low / Null. Wait, it's Harry forever. I mean, you're not overly serious, right? you know the difference between caps and battleships right? why would highsec go there with battleships if you have the caps waiting for them... with the change now it will be an even fight and thats what nullsec wanted to prevent
even if this did make sense it would still sound stupid 
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1150
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:12:30 -
[66] - Quote
Anddo wrote:No, they are just carebears who can't PvP, so they do what they do instead. Worse than mining, really.
Y so mad? Was there an antimatter related accident?
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Anddo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:21:48 -
[67] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Y so mad? Was there an antimatter related accident?
No...I've never lost a ship to you bears. But then again, I look for people who can challenge me and fight back....you wouldn't understand. Keep up the good "PvP" you do, though.
AT14 showed your PvP skills. Going for a similar showing this year? |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2605
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:39:27 -
[68] - Quote
I don't think you understand what pvp means.
And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat. |
Anddo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:41:22 -
[69] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:I don't think you understand what pvp means.
And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat.
Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost. |
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation
That Escalated Quickly.
820
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:43:40 -
[70] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:I don't think you understand what pvp means.
And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat. Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost.
i agree and the only people who really challenge it and throw the whole "everything is pvp" tend to be the people who do nothing but shoot non-combat ships
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1150
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 15:02:49 -
[71] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:I don't think you understand what pvp means.
And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat. Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost.
How is it our problem when they start a fight in a non-combat ship? We are just protecting our territorial claim.. I am not sure why you are so butthurt.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Anddo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 15:19:11 -
[72] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
How is it our problem when they start a fight in a non-combat ship? We are just protecting our territorial claim.. I am not sure why you are so butthurt.
Like your claim over AT14? Oh, wait....right. I remember now.
Pats Ima Wreckyou on the head and gives a gold star. You're cute. |
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1152
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 15:44:00 -
[73] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:
How is it our problem when they start a fight in a non-combat ship? We are just protecting our territorial claim.. I am not sure why you are so butthurt.
Like your claim over AT14? Oh, wait....right. I remember now. Pats Ima Wreckyou on the head and gives a gold star. You're cute.
Thanks, but i already have a gold medal from the last AT, it's even in my bio.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Kenrailae
Fallen Reich
371
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 15:53:18 -
[74] - Quote
Until there are tangible structures that block capitals from high sec, I would be okay with them in high sec because I hate the arbitrary restrictions. 'Empire policy doesn't allow blah blah blah....' That and all those poor towers, stuck in space forever that need to be released from their torment.
The Law is a point of View
|
Anddo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 15:56:50 -
[75] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Thanks, but i already have a gold medal from the last AT, it's even in my bio.
Adorable. I got it
*wink
I loved the spin and backpedaling code did after that disaster. |
Bellatrix Invicta
New Order Logistics
CODE.
19
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 16:07:06 -
[76] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Y so mad? Was there an antimatter related accident?
No...I've never lost a ship to you bears. But then again, I look for people who can challenge me and fight back....you wouldn't understand. Keep up the good "PvP" you do, though. AT14 showed your PvP skills. Going for a similar showing this year?
Confirming that every Agent of the New Order routinely engages in honorable, 1v1 PvP.
If you think you've won, think again.
The CODE always wins.
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2607
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 16:36:10 -
[77] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:I don't think you understand what pvp means.
And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat. Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost.
Sorry but you're factually wong. Or rather I suppose you're actually just bring intellectually dishonest, because I don't buy that you're actually stupid enough to believe what you just wrote.
A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.
Just because you don't like the way CODE. blow up people's space ships it doesn't render it any less a type of pvp. A duck does not stop being a duck because you don't like how it quacks. |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
11449
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 17:52:35 -
[78] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.
This is where "carebears" fail and where real pve players (in the EVE sense) shine. The carebear thinks "I'm not bothering anyone, I should be left alone, so no one will bother me while i make isk".. The better player thinks "while rare, gankers do exist, I better not bling this ship too much, and i better have a plan to survive, as well as a back up continuity plan in case I do get popped I can jump right in to another ship and keep on truckin".
It's not a matter of intelligence or laziness IMO, but rather player "predisposition". If you are the type to make bad assumptions and not the type to think ahead in real life, you're not going to suddenly grow these attributes when playing a video game. |
Anddo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 18:02:27 -
[79] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Sorry but you're factually wong. Or rather I suppose you're actually just bring intellectually dishonest, because I don't buy that you're actually stupid enough to believe what you just wrote.
A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.
Just because you don't like the way CODE. blow up people's space ships it doesn't render it any less a type of pvp. A duck does not stop being a duck because you don't like how it quacks.
That doesn't mean I have to respect it. I 100% support CODE being able to do what they do in game. It's a sandbox. They create great content. I love hunting them, and love treating them like the spineless people they are. It's all part of the meta.
I like the idea of trying to push New Eden to an honorable, no ganking type of world, and honestly I couldn't have fun doing that without people like CODE doing what they do. It's a "I love to hate them" kind of thing. |
Bellatrix Invicta
New Order Logistics
CODE.
20
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 18:05:08 -
[80] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Sorry but you're factually wong. Or rather I suppose you're actually just bring intellectually dishonest, because I don't buy that you're actually stupid enough to believe what you just wrote.
A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.
Just because you don't like the way CODE. blow up people's space ships it doesn't render it any less a type of pvp. A duck does not stop being a duck because you don't like how it quacks.
That doesn't mean I have to respect it. I 100% support CODE being able to do what they do in game. It's a sandbox. They create great content. I love hunting them, and love treating them like the spineless people they are. It's all part of the meta. I like the idea of trying to push New Eden to an honorable, no ganking type of world, and honestly I couldn't have fun doing that without people like CODE doing what they do. It's a "I love to hate them" kind of thing.
"Spineless" - fearless, brave forum alt.
My cup of irony runneth over.
If you think you've won, think again.
The CODE always wins.
|
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
11449
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 18:11:06 -
[81] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Sorry but you're factually wong. Or rather I suppose you're actually just bring intellectually dishonest, because I don't buy that you're actually stupid enough to believe what you just wrote.
A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.
Just because you don't like the way CODE. blow up people's space ships it doesn't render it any less a type of pvp. A duck does not stop being a duck because you don't like how it quacks.
That doesn't mean I have to respect it. I 100% support CODE being able to do what they do in game. It's a sandbox. They create great content. I love hunting them, and love treating them like the spineless people they are. It's all part of the meta. I like the idea of trying to push New Eden to an honorable, no ganking type of world, and honestly I couldn't have fun doing that without people like CODE doing what they do. It's a "I love to hate them" kind of thing.
You don't have to like or hate anything. I just wonder why someone would play a video game with the express purpose of making said video entertainment as boring as possible. It would be like playing Grand Theft Auto with the intention of ridding the (game) world of hoe slapping.
|
Anddo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 18:27:26 -
[82] - Quote
Bellatrix Invicta wrote:
"Spineless" - fearless, brave forum alt.
My cup of irony runneth over.
When code starts playing 'fair', I will too. Deal?
mmmkay. I have three forum alts, and post here with seven characters total. I post with whatever character gives me the biggest advantage.
I'm not in a HS alt alliance to goons like you, and don't have the batphone-ability to mindlessly blop. Easy to talk **** when you are a HS alt to that huge playerbase
Jenn aSide wrote:
You don't have to like or hate anything. I just wonder why someone would play a video game with the express purpose of making said video entertainment as boring as possible. It would be like playing Grand Theft Auto with the intention of ridding the (game) world of hoe slapping.
That's the thing though. "boring" is 100% subjective. |
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation
That Escalated Quickly.
825
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 18:40:36 -
[83] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Anddo wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:I don't think you understand what pvp means.
And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat. Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost. Sorry but you're factually wong. Or rather I suppose you're actually just bring intellectually dishonest, because I don't buy that you're actually stupid enough to believe what you just wrote. A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor. Just because you don't like the way CODE. blow up people's space ships it doesn't render it any less a type of pvp. A duck does not stop being a duck because you don't like how it quacks.
Your factually wrong, pvp is player vs player ie 2 or more player engaged in combat together, these sort of things are like racing just because im on the road in my racecar and overtake a tractor it does not mean i won the race. Because the tractor was just driving on the road not racing
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Bellatrix Invicta
New Order Logistics
CODE.
21
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 20:08:36 -
[84] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Bellatrix Invicta wrote:
"Spineless" - fearless, brave forum alt.
My cup of irony runneth over.
When code starts playing 'fair', I will too. Deal? mmmkay. I have three forum alts, and post here with seven characters total. I post with whatever character gives me the biggest advantage. I'm not in a HS alt alliance to goons like you, and don't have the batphone-ability to mindlessly blop. Easy to talk **** when you are a HS alt to that huge playerbase Jenn aSide wrote:
You don't have to like or hate anything. I just wonder why someone would play a video game with the express purpose of making said video entertainment as boring as possible. It would be like playing Grand Theft Auto with the intention of ridding the (game) world of hoe slapping.
That's the thing though. "boring" is 100% subjective.
Bellatrix IS my main.
If you think you've won, think again.
The CODE always wins.
|
Marsha Mallow
2229
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 20:14:58 -
[85] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Capitals in High Sec are alright by me so long as you can't fly one in high sec while being a member of an npc corp.
Back on topic +1 to this.
If all highsec stations can be destroyed there's a purpose for caps there too. Player corps should be able to wardec NPC corps perhaps.
Solecist Project wrote: See, the issue isn't the rubbing
ISD Ezwal wrote: Nope, no one will get banned for 'rubbing'
Benny Ohu wrote: fire up the argument calibrators set phasers to outraged overheat keyboards reinforce the thread
|
Cyborg Girl86
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
65
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 21:34:03 -
[86] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:
A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.
This is where "carebears" fail and where real pve players (in the EVE sense) shine. The carebear thinks "I'm not bothering anyone, I should be left alone, so no one will bother me while i make isk".. The better player thinks "while rare, gankers do exist, I better not bling this ship too much, and i better have a plan to survive, as well as a back up continuity plan in case I do get popped I can jump right in to another ship and keep on truckin". It's not a matter of intelligence or laziness IMO, but rather player "predisposition". If you are the type to make bad assumptions and not the type to think ahead in real life, you're not going to suddenly grow these attributes when playing a video game.
My thoughts exactly. +1 for you
Paranoia is a good thing in New Eden. Being paranoid and living by the mantra "Trust No One" has saved my ass on more than one occasion.
A lot of the carebears who die have the bad mentality that this game is like other MMOs where PVE'ers can and should be left alone, even though they're wrong, and that simple mistake costs them their ship. |
Anddo
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 01:04:51 -
[87] - Quote
Bellatrix Invicta wrote:
Bellatrix IS my main.
Kind of proves my point, mate. Your main is a toon that can mindlessly batphone a huge group for help with next to no risk. Carebear. so again...about that "PvP"...
|
Aston Martin DB5
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
67
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 01:32:45 -
[88] - Quote
Can't wait for Concord to drop their Titans on your asses. |
Hauler Joe
Forced Euthanasia
Soviet-Union
4
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 03:23:49 -
[89] - Quote
Nobody is using Caps any more they are nerfed beyond use.
I have an Archon that I trained to jump far but now its just collecting dust cause you cannot do anything with it.
Cannot jump far, No sky net, you get fatique timers if you use it.
CCP needs to start firing before this game goes bust and It is.
http://gyazo.com/d0ec7d01301ec917131e4e6b19ca9335
Look at how many players are online right now.
:(
I live is Stain but SW is in empire fighting.... Cause there is nobody home!
Dumb right.
|
Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
169
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 05:36:39 -
[90] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:I don't think you understand what pvp means.
And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat. Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost.
so how do you categories miners and haulers, are they not players? please stop degrading and insulting them, they are people too, they have feelings as well. they are players! 
Just Add Water
|
Omar Alharazaad
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2035
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 05:51:19 -
[91] - Quote
good lord.
This is not about them,
those guys,
or those guys over there.
This is about the potential glory of watching a capital ship get CONCORDOKKEN'ed.
Also, hilarious killmails due to bad decisions regarding metal scraps.
These are the kinds of things that make this totally worthwhile.
Also removing sticks in high sec too, but you know....
Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1154
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 13:04:24 -
[92] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Bellatrix Invicta wrote:
Bellatrix IS my main.
Kind of proves my point, mate. Your main is a toon that can mindlessly batphone a huge group for help with next to no risk. Carebear. so again...about that "PvP"...
You calling everyone you don't agree with a carebear reminded me of that fat little boy who called everyone "fat", even the skinny kids, because it was the one insult he was familiar with and that hurt him the most.
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Bellatrix Invicta
New Order Logistics
CODE.
24
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 14:00:28 -
[93] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Bellatrix Invicta wrote:
Bellatrix IS my main.
Kind of proves my point, mate. Your main is a toon that can mindlessly batphone a huge group for help with next to no risk. Carebear. so again...about that "PvP"...
Only it kinda doesn't. You keep using this "batphone" term. I don't think it means what you think it means. Can we arrange a freighter fleet at the drop of a hat? **** yeah. Know why? Lots of us love blowing up internet spaceships.
Even more of us adore harvesting your tears.
We don't need a "batphone".
And next to no risk? That's what happens when you're good at what you do. /shrug Try it sometime.
If you think you've won, think again.
The CODE always wins.
|
John E Normus
The Conference Elite
CODE.
563
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 15:59:26 -
[94] - Quote
capitals into highsec thread becomes CODE thread.
hahahahaha
All this thread needs now is a touch of Veers...
Between Ignorance and Wisdom
|
Grinder2210
Most Unknown
42
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 17:22:58 -
[95] - Quote
Rexxorr wrote:I'am positive I could find a use for them in lvl 4s.
Surely CCP would be smart and lock Caps outta lvl 4's
However i would give them a chance to make new Capital only missions Could be fun |
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1162
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 17:35:00 -
[96] - Quote
John E Normus wrote:capitals into highsec thread becomes CODE thread.
hahahahaha
All this thread needs now is a touch of Veers...
John! You look really elite now with this googles. Or maybe it's because of the corp...
the Code ALWAYS wins
|
Yazzinra
Scorpion Ventures
74
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 19:24:13 -
[97] - Quote
Posting in this thread, again. |
Dasha D'andria
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 20:23:09 -
[98] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
What's stopping you from going to null? I must be missing something. |
Marsha Mallow
2231
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 20:43:21 -
[99] - Quote
Dasha D'andria wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see What's stopping you from going to null? I must be missing something.
What's stopping you from posting on your main?
If you are going to smack, hiding behind an NPC alt actually validates his remark in some ways.
Although I think 'nullpussy' has a nicer ring than 'nulldog' myself.
Solecist Project wrote: See, the issue isn't the rubbing
ISD Ezwal wrote: Nope, no one will get banned for 'rubbing'
Benny Ohu wrote: fire up the argument calibrators set phasers to outraged overheat keyboards reinforce the thread
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1205
|
Posted - 2015.06.20 21:50:03 -
[100] - Quote
Dasha D'andria wrote:Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see What's stopping you from going to null? I must be missing something.
nothing stopped me, you must be hiding under a big rock if you did not see me yet
YouTube
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2615
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 01:08:06 -
[101] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Your factually wrong, pvp is player vs player ie 2 or more player engaged in combat together, these sort of things are like racing just because im on the road in my racecar and overtake a tractor it does not mean i won the race. Because the tractor was just driving on the road not racing
I understand the point you're making, and I understand why you are making it. You don't like ganking because it's not in-keeping with the artificially narrow and absurd definition of PVP you've come up with to inflate your own ego.
"Ganking isn't honorable combat between equal combatants, therefore it is not combat at all." or something like that is your line of reasoning. This allows you to think that you're in some way superior to gankers because you do real PVP and they don't. It's utterly transparent and a load of horse crap.
You can dislike ganking and feel superior to gankers as much as you like if that's what gets you hard, but no amount of wishful thinking on your part will make ganking anything other than an inherently PVP activity. Sorry about that. |
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
That Escalated Quickly.
1613
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 06:05:12 -
[102] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see
If that ever happens we would harest you high sec dwellers like ripe grapes.
TunDraGon is recruiting!
"Also, your boobs [:o] " -á
CCP Eterne, 2012
"When in doubt...make a di++k joke."-áRobin Williams - RIP
|
Asuka Solo
Knights of Azrael
Circle-Of-Two
2968
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 10:04:19 -
[103] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully soon.
These are ships that also belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed.
Fixed.
Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!
|
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
3688
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 10:14:56 -
[104] - Quote
Bad idea imo.
Oh god.
|
Pryce Caesar
Evil Young Flesh
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 18:01:08 -
[105] - Quote
If there was any intention on the part of the CCP to allow Capital ships into High-Sec space, I do believe that it would be because of what is going on right now with the Drifters/Sleepers. They are connected to the Jove in some way, and I do recall reading the lore about the Jovian Motherships. What if the Sleepers have their own collection of Capital Ships (even Dreadnought and Titan-class Capitals), and Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers? |
BF Guardian
AirHogs
Zulu People
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 08:13:43 -
[106] - Quote
As someone who has both spend a considerable amount of time as a 'carebear', and a lot of time flying capitals in low/null I can say I think this would be a VERY bad change.
This would mean that people could store capitals in highsec at next to no risk, most of the challenge would be removed from missions etc.
The idea of capitals is that they wield enormous benefits to the people that own them, but they are also a challenge to keep alive, and are attractive targets.
There is no reason to let capitals in highsec.
Even to buy/sell them. If you want a capital you have to scan the market, assess the risk, find and buy one and safely get it to its destination.
It SHOULD NOT be as easy as going to jita and back, keeping to highsec apart from the last 2 jumps which you just cyno over as this eliminates all the risk of moving a capital. |
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
3692
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 09:30:21 -
[107] - Quote
Pryce Caesar wrote:Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers?
Does it involve generating vast amounts of ISK out of nothing?
Oh god.
|
Harrison Tato
Yamato Holdings
401
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 09:48:42 -
[108] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Your factually wrong, pvp is player vs player ie 2 or more player engaged in combat together, these sort of things are like racing just because im on the road in my racecar and overtake a tractor it does not mean i won the race. Because the tractor was just driving on the road not racing I understand the point you're making, and I understand why you are making it. You don't like ganking because it's not in-keeping with the artificially narrow and absurd definition of PVP you've come up with to inflate your own ego. "Ganking isn't honorable combat between equal combatants, therefore it is not combat at all." or something like that is your line of reasoning. This allows you to think that you're in some way superior to gankers because you do real PVP and they don't. It's utterly transparent and a load of horse crap. You can dislike ganking and feel superior to gankers as much as you like if that's what gets you hard, but no amount of wishful thinking on your part will make ganking anything other than an inherently PVP activity. Sorry about that.
Everybody knows the real PVP is hot solo on solo frigate action! |
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
829
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 09:50:26 -
[109] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Your factually wrong, pvp is player vs player ie 2 or more player engaged in combat together, these sort of things are like racing just because im on the road in my racecar and overtake a tractor it does not mean i won the race. Because the tractor was just driving on the road not racing I understand the point you're making, and I understand why you are making it. You don't like ganking because it's not in-keeping with the artificially narrow and absurd definition of PVP you've come up with to inflate your own ego. "Ganking isn't honorable combat between equal combatants, therefore it is not combat at all." or something like that is your line of reasoning. This allows you to think that you're in some way superior to gankers because you do real PVP and they don't. It's utterly transparent and a load of horse crap. You can dislike ganking and feel superior to gankers as much as you like if that's what gets you hard, but no amount of wishful thinking on your part will make ganking anything other than an inherently PVP activity. Sorry about that.
again you're wrong, i like ganking, have no issue with it really and often gatecamp myself and will gank anything for fun, i just do not class it as pvp just simply ganking.
However the only egos that get inflated are those who think they are superior to the gank victims and ram pvp down the their throats like they are trying to make out it was some sort of fair fight. just get on with it
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1206
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 11:03:49 -
[110] - Quote
Pryce Caesar wrote:If there was any intention on the part of the CCP to allow Capital ships into High-Sec space, I do believe that it would be because of what is going on right now with the Drifters/Sleepers. They are connected to the Jove in some way, and I do recall reading the lore about the Jovian Motherships. What if the Sleepers have their own collection of Capital Ships (even Dreadnought and Titan-class Capitals), and Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers?
that would be what the game really needs, big capital fights in highsec against an alien force where everybody can join easy, so all the newcomers to eve know right away what this game is about... why hide those big fights in deep nullsec only, there could be gigantic PVE warzones in highsec each day where thousand of ships battle to their bones, this is what the people want and this would bring a real turnaround to the game
YouTube
|
Lord LazyGhost
Bear Bones Brigade
The Bastards.
494
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 11:09:04 -
[111] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Pryce Caesar wrote:If there was any intention on the part of the CCP to allow Capital ships into High-Sec space, I do believe that it would be because of what is going on right now with the Drifters/Sleepers. They are connected to the Jove in some way, and I do recall reading the lore about the Jovian Motherships. What if the Sleepers have their own collection of Capital Ships (even Dreadnought and Titan-class Capitals), and Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers? that would be what the game really needs, big capital fights in highsec against an alien force where everybody can join easy, so all the newcomers to eve know right away what this game is about... why hide those big fights in deep nullsec only, there could be gigantic PVE warzones in highsec each day where thousand of ships battle to their bones, this is what the people want and this would bring a real turnaround to the game
Yer i would like to spend 5hours in a fleet playing Slide Show online |
Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
1206
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 11:15:27 -
[112] - Quote
Lord LazyGhost wrote:Harry Forever wrote:Pryce Caesar wrote:If there was any intention on the part of the CCP to allow Capital ships into High-Sec space, I do believe that it would be because of what is going on right now with the Drifters/Sleepers. They are connected to the Jove in some way, and I do recall reading the lore about the Jovian Motherships. What if the Sleepers have their own collection of Capital Ships (even Dreadnought and Titan-class Capitals), and Capital Ships would be allowed into High-Sec for whatever is going to happen with the Sleepers? that would be what the game really needs, big capital fights in highsec against an alien force where everybody can join easy, so all the newcomers to eve know right away what this game is about... why hide those big fights in deep nullsec only, there could be gigantic PVE warzones in highsec each day where thousand of ships battle to their bones, this is what the people want and this would bring a real turnaround to the game Yer i would like to spend 5hours in a fleet playing Slide Show online
blocked, only for core gamers
YouTube
|
Aleccia Kashada
Perkone
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 14:56:06 -
[113] - Quote
I don't care about capital ships, can we just have carriers? I want a nyx please, that I can float around highsec in. |
Pryce Caesar
Evil Young Flesh
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.22 18:17:27 -
[114] - Quote
Aleccia Kashada wrote:I don't care about capital ships, can we just have carriers? I want a nyx please, that I can float around highsec in.
Carriers ARE capital ships. It is just one of the other classes of capital ship alongside Dreadnoughts and Titans.
Either way, from what I've seen, if the Sleeper presence in High-Sec amounts to something that drastically changes High-Sec New Eden, and they have all three classes of Capital Ships (Dreadnought, Carrier, Titans) then I could foresee Capitals made available in High-sec in the future.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |