|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
2553
   |
Posted - 2015.06.24 12:34:35 -
[1] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Now, the "any change is a good change" types are probably going to float all up in here and proclaim that if you don't like them, you are just against change. Now that everyone is warned:
Those things look stupid as hell, the current icons work fine and look like missile launchers, those things look like "sails". WTF is wrong at CCP these days?
You do realize those are new icons for modules that currently do not exist, right? |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
2553
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 13:28:40 -
[2] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Rowells wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Now, the "any change is a good change" types are probably going to float all up in here and proclaim that if you don't like them, you are just against change. Now that everyone is warned:
Those things look stupid as hell, the current icons work fine and look like missile launchers, those things look like "sails". WTF is wrong at CCP these days? You do realize those are new icons for modules that currently do not exist, right? Sigh Quote:CCP Rise GÇÅ@CCP_Rise 20h20 hours ago
@Caldari_5 @kiratsukimoto False! We are replacing the ballistic control system icon.
0 retweets 0 favorites Read people.
Source before claim people. Also clarity helps too. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
2553
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 13:59:47 -
[3] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
?
The OP linked the source. Click on it, then click the blue bit at the top, takes you to twitter. It's not my fault you don't internet.
"All you have to do is click the link, click the other link, and scroll through the replies to find it"
OP didn't link your source. To which you didn't even refer to when you mentioned it. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
2553
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 14:18:59 -
[4] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Rowells wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
?
The OP linked the source. Click on it, then click the blue bit at the top, takes you to twitter. It's not my fault you don't internet.
"All you have to do is click the link, click the other link, and scroll through the replies to find it" OP didn't link your source. To which you didn't even refer to when you mentioned it. It's that hard for you to say you made a mistake? Wow dude.
did I? Maybe I'm stubborn, but i quite remember someone telling me that I can't read because they didn't have the sense to link their context the first time. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
2553
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 14:49:20 -
[5] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Rowells wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Rowells wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
?
The OP linked the source. Click on it, then click the blue bit at the top, takes you to twitter. It's not my fault you don't internet.
"All you have to do is click the link, click the other link, and scroll through the replies to find it" OP didn't link your source. To which you didn't even refer to when you mentioned it. It's that hard for you to say you made a mistake? Wow dude. did I? Maybe I'm stubborn, but i quite remember someone telling me that I can't read because they didn't have the sense to link their context the first time. That's not stubborn, it's dumb. While harping on my lack of posting a link that already existed, did it ever occur to you to maybe not post incorrect information in the 1st place? Maybe learn to wait till you know what you are talking about before posting? But hey, if it makes you feel better to not confront your mistake but rather blame me, it's ok kid, you'll grow out of that one day...maybe.
link that already existed where? Within the original link and further down the page on that too? You only linked it after you realized nobody knew what you were talking about. And now you are acting like it was the original link from the get go.
but hey, my kettle is black, isn't it? |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
2553
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 15:11:20 -
[6] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Had you actually clicked on things and read before posting, you would not have posted that. I am and was correct, you were and are incorrect, not the end of the world as we all get things wrong from time to time, but rather than being butt hurt you should be using this to learn how to be better. Take a second and think/examine before posting next time. Have a good day man.
oh, I see. You think I'm whining on the fact that you vaguely stated something and got snippity when people thought you were referring to something you weren't, because you didn't bother to mention you were on a different subject than them.
So, in summary, you are upset because someone called you out on being vague and unclear, and you are trying to maintain some sort of aggressive posture by throwing out a source further beyond what was linked (and sub-linked) after you made the claim. Not to mention the vagueness of the original claim. All so you could come back around and say,"lol read you dumbs", instead of just linking the further source you used and clarifying your original statement. But, loike you said, this is the internet. I should have expected that kind of snippy attitude. My bad on that part. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Fidelas Constans
2554
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 21:44:16 -
[7] - Quote
Mag's wrote:I doubt it, you've not stopped digging that hole you found yourself in. 
Haven't hit the bedrock yet. Need more shovels. |
|
|
| |
|