| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1086
   |
Posted - 2015.07.07 16:02:51 -
[1] - Quote
it seems...odd...to announce a nerf like this one to switchable ihubs (which largely deal with the fact that CCP provides no tools to turn strategic upgrades off) a mere seven days before it is to be implemented, with no notice whatsoever
was the CSM looped into this change in a timely way? |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1086
|
Posted - 2015.07.07 16:05:58 -
[2] - Quote
do ihubs/tcus block pocos, and vice versa? |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1086
|
Posted - 2015.07.07 16:44:22 -
[3] - Quote
Vigilanta wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:do ihubs/tcus block pocos, and vice versa? pocos are the anchoring arrow drag drop, they dont need to be on the zero point just a general zone, same with tcus and ihubs (its in the blog the actual ranges)
Yes, but pocos can block outposts if dropped at zero which is why I'm concerned. |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1086
|
Posted - 2015.07.07 17:11:06 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:
The large isk injection is something we would like to avoid at this time, and history has proven that reimbursing ISK for player-manufacturable items is extremely dangerous.
Then drop them in a station. |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1086
|
Posted - 2015.07.07 17:58:28 -
[5] - Quote
We can't refund these on our own, because we can't get the upgrades out of secondary ihubs. This is just blowing up our assets without any possibility we can recover them. |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1086
|
Posted - 2015.07.07 19:10:24 -
[6] - Quote
utec asmo wrote:
Killing the unused structures is the right way to go.
The people with offline Ihubs/TCU either didn't care about them and just relied on the fact that their hp would deteriorate anyone from actually killing them or used multiple Ihubs to circumvent the permanent sov cost increase of upgrades.
We absolutely cared about them, and being able to switch which upgrades were on and which were not is a basic functionality of the sov system that was missing and required alliances to use dual-hubs to fix. Alliances are now being punished for developing systems to work around flaws in the sov implementation. |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1086
|
Posted - 2015.07.07 19:44:12 -
[7] - Quote
Another issue: you say you're going to put up buys for SBU BPOs, but that won't work - once a bpo has been used for anything (manufacturing, copying, or research) it can never be repackaged and sold to buy orders.
So, uh, anyone with an SBU BPO is basically stuck with a (worse, because it costs less and the markets is now glutted to hell and back) TCU BPO. |
EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1086
|
Posted - 2015.07.07 19:45:34 -
[8] - Quote
utec asmo wrote:
Maybe, just maybe CCP wants you to make a permanent decision of either having no cost and no upgrades or upgrades and costs permanently.
we couldn't even destroy an upgrade in an ihub without destroying ALL the upgrades in the ihub
it was purely that the system was incompletely coded and people trying to back in justifications are obviously wrong |
| |
|