| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Persephone IX
Abyssos
0
   |
Posted - 2015.09.18 08:31:23 -
[31] - Quote
Juan Mileghere wrote:only time I might think T3 BSes would be decent is if they're TIER 3 like Attack BCs, yeah, Dread guns on that BS 
Oh rly? Dread guns? How about a miniaturized doomsday device, Or Fighters bombers yes! Immune to ewar and can fire Ponies!
Please explain what niche would such a ship fit in, whats its purpose. |
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
Decayed Orbit
991
|
Posted - 2015.09.18 09:34:59 -
[32] - Quote
Necroing thread isn't going to make T3BS a better or more popular idea.
Resurrecting James excellent Making Battleships worth the warp! 2.0 thread would have been of far more value.
NBSI shall be the whole of the Law
|
Tabyll Altol
Breaking.Bad
Circle-Of-Two
119
|
Posted - 2015.09.18 12:56:52 -
[33] - Quote
Shade Alidiana wrote:What if T3 BS would be just a compilation of current t3 dessies and cruisers? I mean subsystems and modes.
I don't really know how to make them not really more powerful than existing pirate BSes. But just in general this would be an interesting ship to play with, both as fitter and pilot.
I will possibly post more here if I come up with more/better ideas (or update this message if it allows me to)
Oh that topic again, i think CCP should reconsider the search funktion if it-¦s that hard to find.
-1 |
Shade Alidiana
PROSPERO Corporation
MinTek Conglomerate
77
|
Posted - 2015.09.18 15:40:36 -
[34] - Quote
Tabyll Altol wrote:Shade Alidiana wrote:What if T3 BS would be just a compilation of current t3 dessies and cruisers? I mean subsystems and modes.
I don't really know how to make them not really more powerful than existing pirate BSes. But just in general this would be an interesting ship to play with, both as fitter and pilot.
I will possibly post more here if I come up with more/better ideas (or update this message if it allows me to) Oh that topic again, i think CCP should reconsider the search funktion if it-¦s that hard to find. -1
This one is old. As the time goes, I tend to care less and less about my eve experience. It might not be beautiful, not much fun to play, just have a couple friends remaining worth continuing the meaningless process. But I've had a message to reply. Maybe I shouldn't have done it in a public topic. |
Aven Valkyr
Aven's Flight School
Zero Fux.
6
|
Posted - 2015.09.19 00:23:30 -
[35] - Quote
Listen. I've been around for a long time (2006). I may not have been active that entire time, but I do remember a few things.
As an old timer I remember when T3's came out. They came out shortly after wormholes were released (or shortly before, or sometime there around). The point of T3's was for WORMHOLE survivability against the increased difficulty of the rats. And yes, wormhole rats are difficult. They are much more powerful than anywhere else, except now this new drifter thing going on.
You people really want a fix to the T3 issue then here it is. Make T3 ships have T1 resists, as suggested elsewhere. Unless, you are in a wormhole. In which case you can activate "wormhole mode", where the activation can only occur in a wormhole. Then you get the resists of the ship. Otherwise, while in empire/null/low, the T3 is just another cruiser/destroyer/etc.
Would this not make sense? To force players to use T3's for what their original purpose was intended to be? I think it makes sense. |
Shade Alidiana
PROSPERO Corporation
MinTek Conglomerate
77
|
Posted - 2015.09.19 14:44:31 -
[36] - Quote
What I know most about t3s is that they're a fun to hunt and quite boring to pve in... Never tried pvping in one, but...
Aven Valkyr wrote:Listen. I've been around for a long time (2006). I may not have been active that entire time, but I do remember a few things.
As an old timer I remember when T3's came out. They came out shortly after wormholes were released (or shortly before, or sometime there around). The point of T3's was for WORMHOLE survivability against the increased difficulty of the rats. And yes, wormhole rats are difficult. They are much more powerful than anywhere else, except now this new drifter thing going on.
You people really want a fix to the T3 issue then here it is. Make T3 ships have T1 resists, as suggested elsewhere. Unless, you are in a wormhole. In which case you can activate "wormhole mode", where the activation can only occur in a wormhole. Then you get the resists of the ship. Otherwise, while in empire/null/low, the T3 is just another cruiser/destroyer/etc.
Would this not make sense? To force players to use T3's for what their original purpose was intended to be? I think it makes sense.
t3s were introduced together with wormholes I think, and nothing restricting the ships' usability will ever make sense to me. Not even my unability to jury-rig freighter with a capital battery. Or shoot ships with mining lasers. Or pack explosives into a shuttle and ramming it somewhere. Or strip all drones and weapons (which should be there) from a carrier and using it as a personal transport in hisec. Normally, anything can be used in a thousand ways, and creating artificial restrictions... Is exactly what CCP is doing way too much. |
Azazel The Misanthrope
Proioxis Assault Force
Exodus.
67
|
Posted - 2015.09.19 15:36:39 -
[37] - Quote
I am all for more ship classes and all even if it is T3, but CCP has a horrible history of introducing these ship classes in a way that they are blatantly unbalanced with the highest potential for abuse. If they can implement this idea in a way that doesn't make the ship class too much then I am all for it. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |