look specifically after Z142 and N432.

These datasets only picking up 'C5 w/any null' or you pulling 'C5a w/null 1-2-3' 'C5b w/null 1' etc?

Caldera, the K162s are relavant too, no?

~40% seems surprisingly high.

Weird.
Is that the data of all tripwire users combined?
Those numbers appear to be extremely low... or is that because most people update the type later? (tbh. I've never really used Tripwire, so no clue how that part works)

As a side note: just the number of null connections going down doesn't say very much without the number of corresponding (high class) wormhole systems. With such a small number of holes it could be just one active scanner going on vacation.

Ideally just Z142, V283, C248, K329 because the statics arenGÇÖt relevant. If possible include the sigs which were updated later GÇô the numbers shown above are too low to be meaningful and is probably due to the majority not being correctly entered up front.

Wow, that's really low. Probably we will notice something significant with high enough numbers if we could just see the number of worms with at least one null sec side entered per day. NS to C5 was pretty much the two-third of it. Can you group by space type or only by worm type?
By the way I'm dreaming of a feature for tripwire : be able to enter just a space type/class for destination (HS, LS, NS, WHC1-3, WHC4-5, WHC6) without name. It would be even more shiny with a color code like on the eve-scout site.