|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
1200
   |
Posted - 2015.07.16 11:21:20 -
[1] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:
I do feel "roaming in WH space" does indeed equal not fighting in WH space. I don't think i made the leap to say that that meant they wouldn't come home and fight you but since you bring it up i guess everyone would then evaluate the desire to "come back" dependent on who or what.
I do find fights in WH space (not ganks) to be far superior to null roams in crappy ships. But then that is a personal opinion and well this is what this is all about.
A big issue with wormholes is the sense of entitlement, as posted way above. The *entitled to a fight, right here, on this hole, at 0m*.
If you want a fight in w-space, it should always start with you snatching one of them and escalating from there. If you could kill him, hold him, if they don't form within 2-3 minutes and start coming on grid, kill it and roll it.
Taking a fight because someone sits on a hole asking for one is RCOAT-level of sadness. |
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
1203
|
Posted - 2015.07.17 10:58:26 -
[2] - Quote
Aladar Dangerface wrote:Robert Caldera wrote:
I cant speak much about WH space overall, since I dont live there but every time I pass, it feels like stepping through a ghost town.
We are there, cloaked, in our proteii, watching, waiting..............
So I found those probes in my static converging on the K162 I just punched in, I just left it for a quick check. Get my sabre ready. While waiting, a second sabre lands next to me and cloaks up. Scanner jumps, other sabre decloaks to go for the scanner, I decloak to sabre that sabre, another proteus decloaks and both sabres **** their pants, jump through and panicwarp to some random spot.
#Wormholes |
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
1205
|
Posted - 2015.07.17 15:44:37 -
[3] - Quote
CivilWars wrote:Recruits or "blues" everything they can.
Evicts everyone they can't recruit or blue.
Complains there is no content in their "area".
Is this the null sub-forum, or wormhole sub-forum? I may be lost.
You are in the wormhole subsection, random dooder #46. |
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
1205
|
Posted - 2015.07.17 15:56:51 -
[4] - Quote
Andrew Jester wrote:Lloyd Roses wrote:CivilWars wrote:Recruits or "blues" everything they can.
Evicts everyone they can't recruit or blue.
Complains there is no content in their "area".
Is this the null sub-forum, or wormhole sub-forum? I may be lost. You are in the wormhole subsection, random dooder #46. damn that was weak
Implying the whole thread isn't. |
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
1214
|
Posted - 2015.07.22 13:17:56 -
[5] - Quote
Justin Cody wrote:
2) Null seccers are just as risk averse as high seccers and they got a CSM Scumbag to convince the devs to nerf an otherwise valid game system. Not only that it was nerfed into the ground.
Lowsec people and wormhole people are totally not risk-averse... The only person I ever found not being straight risk-averse is Tim, and he's rather naive instead 
*He let's jump into that hostile fleet without any chance to even dent someone's tank unless all their logi DC at once* said no one, ever. |
|
|
| |
|