| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zsha
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
   |
Posted - 2015.07.29 11:29:49 -
[1] - Quote
As the topic states. |
Zsha
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 11:37:41 -
[2] - Quote
But this Is an obvious change that needs doing to stop the shaft of 1 account holding players who like to PvP. |
Zsha
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 12:39:38 -
[3] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:Ccp has said several times they AGREE OGLs are broken and need fixed
They said they cant figure out how to fix the code though Not quite true. They're looking for a way which won't melt TQ. Ranged is easy. Just test the range to the boosting ship ever X. That's an expensive operation though. (see what happens with 15 people all spam dscan at the same time)
What does melting TQ have to do with anything? TQ Isn't even a word.
Normal people who hold one account get the shaft.
On grid boosting SHOULD be a thing, there would be an increase in Command ship usage since the reason behind their design, to give boosts to fleet members in combat.
Fielding a Command ship in an engagement would be a good bring to any fleet AKA LINKS.
**** off grid boosting, seriously, it's such a sly way for someone to get the upper hand in an engagement, through solo play/small gang.
Really don't get how people enjoy alt-tabbing from combat char/link char, basically using 2 accounts to kill a 1 account holding person.
COME ON CCP ALREADY...................................................yaaaaaaaawwwwwwwnnnnn. |
Zsha
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 12:53:25 -
[4] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:... They're looking for a way which won't melt TQ. Ranged is easy. Just test the range to the boosting ship ever X. That's an expensive operation though. ... "Are they on the over view?" "Are they boosting?" Yes + yes = receive boosts.
"Is CCP milking account subscriptions?" "Is CCP doing this at a cost which decreases gameplay enjoyment?"
Yes + yes = receive removal of offgrid boosting and increased gameplay fun for all.
|
Zsha
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 13:10:12 -
[5] - Quote
Niriel Greez wrote:Zsha wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:Ccp has said several times they AGREE OGLs are broken and need fixed
They said they cant figure out how to fix the code though Not quite true. They're looking for a way which won't melt TQ. Ranged is easy. Just test the range to the boosting ship ever X. That's an expensive operation though. (see what happens with 15 people all spam dscan at the same time) What does melting TQ have to do with anything? TQ Isn't even a word. Normal people who hold one account get the shaft. On grid boosting SHOULD be a thing, there would be an increase in Command ship usage since the reason behind their design, to give boosts to fleet members in combat. Fielding a Command ship in an engagement would be a good bring to any fleet AKA LINKS. **** off grid boosting, seriously, it's such a sly way for someone to get the upper hand in an engagement, through solo play/small gang. Really don't get how people enjoy alt-tabbing from combat char/link char, basically using 2 accounts to kill a 1 account holding person. COME ON CCP ALREADY...................................................yaaaaaaaawwwwwwwnnnnn. Stop posting please. On-grid links means that the bigger entity will be able to defend them, and thus use them, while everyone else will not. This would only benefit the blob further and is a terrible idea. Either completely remove links from the game and refund SP, or leave it as it is.
Then remove them, they're ******* stupid.
|
Zsha
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 13:25:37 -
[6] - Quote
Remove the need for paying for a second account to remain competitive, this is the most annoying thing!!!!!!!!!!! |
Zsha
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 13:33:19 -
[7] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:i dont understand why that is even relevant, are you saying remove alts so people can have fairish fights by only running expensive implants to have an edge? good luck getting ccp to lose money on subscriptions
Yeah I am. |
Zsha
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 13:47:26 -
[8] - Quote
Switch Savage wrote:Just to clarify i have no problem with OGB. When you choose engagements they are just another thing to factor in to the "can i kill him" assessment.
Which is wrong |
Zsha
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 13:48:14 -
[9] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Zsha wrote:Lan Wang wrote:i dont understand why that is even relevant, are you saying remove alts so people can have fairish fights by only running expensive implants to have an edge? good luck getting ccp to lose money on subscriptions Yeah I am. well doubt it will happen so get use to it and buy a booster or some nice shiny implants
What implants?
|
| |
|