EVE Search - Frontier Eve

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Frontier Eve

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Scsiborg	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:11:00 - [1] Cant we just get rid of these star gates? - use jump drives (proper ones that can be operated on your own) and fuel - Like frontier elite II - the better the jump drive the further you can jump and the more fuel required. (or leave the gates where the are for people without jump drives in addition) And what about Planet Landings? Pleaseeeee
Bad Borris	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:15:00 - [2] There is probably more chance of nasa doing that before ccp....
Scsiborg	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:15:00 - [3] why though it would be great do you not agree?
Pia Domina	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:20:00 - [4] Originally by: Scsiborg Cant we just get rid of these star gates? - use jump drives (proper ones that can be operated on your own) and fuel - Like frontier elite II - the better the jump drive the further you can jump and the more fuel required. (or leave the gates where the are for people without jump drives in addition) And what about Planet Landings? Pleaseeeee There are two solutions to your problem: 1. Eve and Frontier are different games, although obviously one is inspired by the other. If you want ships that can jump between stars without gates, play Elite. 2. If you want to jump between stars in Eve without using gates you can. Learn to fly a capital ship.
Omega Man The Geddy Foundation	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:22:00 - [5] i do not agree, we have 0km BMs which CCP fought against long and hard until it became clear the battle had really been lost with the massive use of instas in the game and the lag it was causing. CCP always wanted ship speed to be an element within the game and clearly they could have just deleted all insta BMs and never instigate 0km warping but the backlash would have been hideous within the player base. I dont think they are in the business of dumbing down this game unless backed into a corner to do so. And I really hope that is an attitude they maintain. Gates are important to the game mechanics IMO.
Scsiborg	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:24:00 - [6] Originally by: Pia Domina Originally by: Scsiborg Cant we just get rid of these star gates? - use jump drives (proper ones that can be operated on your own) and fuel - Like frontier elite II - the better the jump drive the further you can jump and the more fuel required. (or leave the gates where the are for people without jump drives in addition) And what about Planet Landings? Pleaseeeee There are two solutions to your problem: 1. Eve and Frontier are different games, although obviously one is inspired by the other. If you want ships that can jump between stars without gates, play Elite. 2. If you want to jump between stars in Eve without using gates you can. Learn to fly a capital ship. 1. I dont have a problem? i was making a suggestion. 2. Elite is a very old discontinued game - i was mierly giving one example of where it has been used in the past. 3. in a capital ship - you cant go anywhere you like with jump drives - it rakes someone at the other end to open a path for you. i can help but think... sometimes, people are more rude on here than they need to be - i mean whats all that about?
Irias Salo Caldari The Star Wolves	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:25:00 - [7] Originally by: Bad Borris There is probably more chance of nasa doing that before ccp.... Heh, funny you should say that. I recently read somewhere that Nasa are planning on starting a moon base, with construction to begin in 2020.
Scsiborg	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:26:00 - [8] Originally by: Omega Man i do not agree, we have 0km BMs which CCP fought against long and hard until it became clear the battle had really been lost with the massive use of instas in the game and the lag it was causing. CCP always wanted ship speed to be an element within the game and clearly they could have just deleted all insta BMs and never instigate 0km warping but the backlash would have been hideous within the player base. I dont think they are in the business of dumbing down this game unless backed into a corner to do so. And I really hope that is an attitude they maintain. Gates are important to the game mechanics IMO. You know, your probably right - they do they slow eveyone down considerably though. Planet landings would be amazing - oh and not flying through things too :D you know im only speculating, i just think that it would make the game as good as it really could be
Uggster Caldari FinFleet Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:29:00 - [9] Originally by: Irias Salo Originally by: Bad Borris There is probably more chance of nasa doing that before ccp.... Heh, funny you should say that. I recently read somewhere that Nasa are planning on starting a moon base, with construction to begin in 2020. Funney they should annouce it after years and years of feet dragging a few months after the chinese stated that they wanted to have a "permanant presence" on the moon by 2025. _______________________________________________ Sig removed as inappropriate- Tirg Story of my life that one :(
Omega Man The Geddy Foundation	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:31:00 - [10] Edited by: Omega Man on 07/12/2006 11:31:20 Originally by: Irias Salo Originally by: Bad Borris There is probably more chance of nasa doing that before ccp.... Heh, funny you should say that. I recently read somewhere that Nasa are planning on starting a moon base, with construction to begin in 2020. I actually saw a moonbase which was in existence in 1999 but something went wrong and the moon was blasted out of orbit, every Sunday afternoon there was an update about it on the TV during the 1970s. What NASA says to get funding and what NASA does when it has the funding are rather different things.
Scsiborg	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:33:00 - [11] Originally by: Omega Man Edited by: Omega Man on 07/12/2006 11:31:20 Originally by: Irias Salo Originally by: Bad Borris There is probably more chance of nasa doing that before ccp.... Heh, funny you should say that. I recently read somewhere that Nasa are planning on starting a moon base, with construction to begin in 2020. I actually saw a moonbase which was in existence in 1999 but something went wrong and the moon was blasted out of orbit, every Sunday afternoon there was an update about it on the TV during the 1970s. What NASA says to get funding and what NASA does when it has the funding are rather different things. Lets do it in eve first :D!! - u see what i did there?? eh eh?
The Snowman Gallente Center for Advanced Studies	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:41:00 - [12] yea sounds good.. I think Dave Braben copyrighted that idea tho xD <------------> Poker RPG 60 jumps 'Flop' by..
James Duar Merch Industrial	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:44:00 - [13] Originally by: Scsiborg Originally by: Omega Man Edited by: Omega Man on 07/12/2006 11:31:20 Originally by: Irias Salo Originally by: Bad Borris There is probably more chance of nasa doing that before ccp.... Heh, funny you should say that. I recently read somewhere that Nasa are planning on starting a moon base, with construction to begin in 2020. I actually saw a moonbase which was in existence in 1999 but something went wrong and the moon was blasted out of orbit, every Sunday afternoon there was an update about it on the TV during the 1970s. What NASA says to get funding and what NASA does when it has the funding are rather different things. Lets do it in eve first :D!! - u see what i did there?? eh eh? EVE has taught us that we're lagging behind in POS spamming our system. Right now just anyone could come in and shoot our station!
Scsiborg	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:48:00 - [14] Edited by: Scsiborg on 07/12/2006 11:49:30 Originally by: The Snowman yea sounds good.. I think Dave Braben copyrighted that idea tho xD Aww ur kidding :( - i emailed him about elite 4 - he actually replied - apparently its being released some time early 2008 - it seems that eve may have some stiff competition soon. He also told me that sim coster or some other coster simulation game was relesed to test a new physics engine. but he wasnt too specific
Noluck Ned FATAL REVELATIONS Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.12.07 11:49:00 - [15] Originally by: Omega Man I actually saw a moonbase which was in existence in 1999 but something went wrong and the moon was blasted out of orbit, every Sunday afternoon there was an update about it on the TV during the 1970s. Yeah, I remember that, It seems we lost the ability to see into the future around the end of the seventies....conspiracy I tell you, conspiracy!!one1 F4T4L is Recruiting!

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.