| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Justin Cody
Caldari
The Priory
Shroud Of Darkness
   |
Posted - 2006.12.13 18:44:00 -
[1]
Has the implementation of the Warp to 0 option helped with the Db load at all? I would like to see if there has been some analysis of it. I haven't noticed a visual improvement on the client side, but I'd be interested on the server side improvement (if any)
Remind people that profit is the difference between revenue and expense. This makes you look smart.
Scott Adams
|
Grez
Minmatar
The Raven Warriors
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 18:45:00 -
[2]
Ofcourse it bloody has. No-one copies BM's anymore.
---
Cache Clearer
Still waiting for a Wrangler-edit! |
Rodrigo XanDiest
Gallente
University of Caille
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 18:52:00 -
[3]
I'm with you, Justin. It would be cool if CCP would offer up some numbers, showing us the difference in server load. Maybe a pie chart. :) Still, things have been far from stable, in terms of people on. Player activity might have to settle down before a fair, accurate comparison can be made.
|
Justin Cody
Caldari
The Priory
Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 18:53:00 -
[4]
its all scalable with the population so that doesn't matter as much, and we don't know if it has until the dev's tell us...a nice blog would help.
Remind people that profit is the difference between revenue and expense. This makes you look smart.
Scott Adams
|
Deikan Frost
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 19:05:00 -
[5]
The thing that was causing slowdowns wasn't the creation or deletion of bookmarks, it was the huge database queries that each player was doing every single time they opened their bookmark folders... The Warp to 0km itself didn't fix this, it's the fact they deleted all bookmarks that were 0-25km from a station or a gate that did...
Anyway, that's how I understood it, and being a server admin myself that is what I would believe caused the performance degradation.
|
Justin Cody
Caldari
The Priory
Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 19:17:00 -
[6]
right but there should be some sort of performance increase server side...I'd like to see the numbers is all.
Remind people that profit is the difference between revenue and expense. This makes you look smart.
Scott Adams
|
Paddlefoot Aeon
Neogen Industries
Serenity Fallen
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 19:24:00 -
[7]
Also, every time you would jump into a system, your entire list of BMs was scanned to see if any apply to the system you are in. Not having all the Db calls anymore will probably decrease latency for other calls, like market and escrow/contract, or the lag you got opening POS corp hangers or loot cans/wrecks.
-----------------------------------------------
|
Miss Overlord
Gallente
Ferrum Pugnus
New Eve Order
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 19:27:00 -
[8]
and yet lag numbers are thro the roof. tho thats just the rushed nature of the revelations patch and th subsequent stuff ups
These posts represent my personal views and not those of my corp or alliance. These do not reflect offical alliance or corp views
This is a disclaimer |
Deikan Frost
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 19:29:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Deikan Frost on 13/12/2006 19:30:54
 Originally by: Justin Cody
right but there should be some sort of performance increase server side...I'd like to see the numbers is all.
I agree, I'd like to hear a CCP server admin show some statistics as well...
I have no idea how their backbone is setup, but I would assume they have several servers managing only the services (station service, agent service, stargate service, etc...), which talk to the SQL database server. And that all those servers are clustered to share the load (with load balancing). The thing is were the bookmark updates (when a player opened up his bookmarks folders) causing whatever service's queue to go up too high? were they making the CPU of that server go crazy high, or was it on the SQL backend that the problem was?
Of course that info is proprietary to CCP and I really doubt they share any with us, but I'd like to understand how the EVE server infrastructure works...
|
Razean
Minmatar
Agony Unleashed
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 19:41:00 -
[10]
Link
|
ToxicFire
Warlords Corp
The Core Collective
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 20:39:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Razean
Link
What that doesn't show you is how badly the place lagged out during that and then subsequently crashed in places
Join the save Stargate SG1 Campaign Today!
http://savestargatesg1.com/
|
BurnHard
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 20:41:00 -
[12]
Hmmmm also 47% capacity - what is that, averaged over all servers? The problem with Eve isn't it's total capacity / number of players, it's the system capacity constraints / number of players.
There are lies, damned lies and marketing  .
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |