| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Starbuilder Stasarik
EVE University Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 00:58:59 -
[1] - Quote
Omber is the worst ore to mine in the game by a long shot. It has 85 units of Tritanium, 34 units of Pyerite, and 85 units of Isogen, and at current mineral value, it's worth about 175 ISK-per-m3, which is significantly behind the second-lowest ore, Veldspar, at 225 ISK-per-m3.
By adding 27 Mexallon to Omber, its value would be bumped up to approximately 200 ISK-per-m3 at current market values, and would do so without really stepping on the toes of any other ores.
Although I would really enjoy to see Omber made even more competitive if it were really doable. Increase each of the three current minerals by 5 units per refine (so Tritanium is 90 units, Pyerite is 39, Isogen is 90), then make it produce 32 units of Mexallon. That would bring the ISK-per-m3 value up to about 215 ISK-per-m3 at the current mineral values. It still wouldn't be the best ore to mine for any real reason by any longshot, but it would at least be a little less of a worthless ore to mine.
This change to Omber would make it a very general all-around type of ore that wouldn't really excell at any one thing but it wouldn't be terrible to mine either. |

Rawketsled
Generic Corp Name
270
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 02:35:42 -
[2] - Quote
CCP just needs to add things that require more Isogen. |

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2601
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 02:36:08 -
[3] - Quote
I support adding minerals to ore because I'd like to see mining pay for time decreased, but I primarily want to see those increases in high-end ores found only outside of empire space...or rather those that should only be found outside of empire space!
Omber is a weak ore, however. But rather than increase its mexallon output, I believe its isogen output should be increased--by a very small amount mind you. It struggles in competition with Kernite, not Plagioclase. As Kernite produces both Isogen and Mexallon, it remains more stable in value than Plagioclase or Omber which each produce only one. However, both Plagioclase and Omber produce a significant amount of tritanium and pyerite, which makes their value fluctuate separately from Kernite.
If Omber is significantly less valuable than Kernite and Plagioclase currently, that indicates that isogen is currently at reduced value. It'll go back up once people mine less Omber, Kernite, Hemorphite, Hedbergite, and Gneiss.
Pirate ship Nightmare, can you fathom
Larger but with smaller spikes than Phantasm
The Succubus looks meaner
But the Revenant cleaner
Seems as they get bigger, the smaller spikes they has'm
|

Uriam Khanid
New Machinarium Corporation
7
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 04:57:17 -
[4] - Quote
Omber problem nas nothing to isogen market price Kernite and Plagioclase offer more and different type of minerals for example - Kernit gives you isogen+mexallon; Plagioclase - mexallon+pyerite+tritanium Omber - well, just the same amount of isogen as a kernite. nothing more. and that a core of a problem. best way is to increase Omber value is to double/tripl isze of pyerite/tritanium. |

Tabyll Altol
Breaking.Bad Circle-Of-Two
109
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 11:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
ore gets buffed --> price dropps --> pilots cry --> ore gets buffed --> prices dropp --> stop it now!
-1 |

Alyxportur
From Our Cold Dead Hands
104
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 14:30:38 -
[6] - Quote
Ore needs nerfed to increase its value, not buffed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_treadmill |

Haatakan Reppola
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 15:15:23 -
[7] - Quote
Nerf the mineral content of all the other ores then :P
Easier solution is to buff worst so it get close to the rest... |

Lugues Slive
Diamond Light Industries
36
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 16:31:17 -
[8] - Quote
Tabyll Altol wrote:ore gets buffed --> price dropps --> pilots cry --> ore gets buffed --> prices dropp --> stop it now!
-1
Exactly this, the only viable way to increase the value of minerals is to decrease supply or increase the demand. Look at the last null ore rebalance, the ore value went up not because of the increased minerals, but the universal doubling of mega and zyd demand.
|

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
474
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 17:05:51 -
[9] - Quote
Starbuilder Stasarik wrote:Omber is the worst ore to mine in the game by a long shot. It has 85 units of Tritanium, 34 units of Pyerite, and 85 units of Isogen, and at current mineral value, it's worth about 175 ISK-per-m3, which is significantly behind the second-lowest ore, Veldspar, at 225 ISK-per-m3.
By adding 27 Mexallon to Omber, its value would be bumped up to approximately 200 ISK-per-m3 at current market values, and would do so without really stepping on the toes of any other ores.
Although I would really enjoy to see Omber made even more competitive if it were really doable. Increase each of the three current minerals by 5 units per refine (so Tritanium is 90 units, Pyerite is 39, Isogen is 90), then make it produce 32 units of Mexallon. That would bring the ISK-per-m3 value up to about 215 ISK-per-m3 at the current mineral values. It still wouldn't be the best ore to mine for any real reason by any longshot, but it would at least be a little less of a worthless ore to mine.
This change to Omber would make it a very general all-around type of ore that wouldn't really excell at any one thing but it wouldn't be terrible to mine either.
Wrong other ore contains significant amounts of mexallon and zero isogen. You need more isogen so your ore retains its intended mineral mixture while giving you more isk per hour returns.
I agree with what seems your basic premise that veldslar should be dead last in isk per hour since it is everywhere.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
474
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 17:17:18 -
[10] - Quote
Uriam Khanid wrote:Omber problem nas nothing to isogen market price Kernite and Plagioclase offer more and different type of minerals for example - Kernit gives you isogen+mexallon; Plagioclase - mexallon+pyerite+tritanium Omber - well, just the same amount of isogen as a kernite. nothing more. and that a core of a problem. best way is to increase Omber value is to double/tripl isze of pyerite/tritanium.
Pyerite and tritanium are easy to come by while isogen is much harder to get. I get 100 percent of my isogen from mod reprocessing its that hard to come by, give omber something the market needs not something its puking up because it has so much already.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
474
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 17:30:32 -
[11] - Quote
Tabyll Altol wrote:ore gets buffed --> price dropps --> pilots cry --> ore gets buffed --> prices dropp --> stop it now!
-1
While blanket increases in ore mining amount never increase the real value of said ore, adjusting mineral balance can shift income from one ore to another. The recent mineral shift to nullsec at highsecs expense has transferred billions worth of value per day from highsec to those poor downtrodden denizens of nullsec, who probably didnt even notice yet another zero was added to their already obscene corporate wallets.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|

Max Deveron
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
227
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 18:48:30 -
[12] - Quote
unless your talking about trit....veld is actually no more worth than an avg of 166 approx (did a quick calc) per m3....10 rocks in a m3 of veld.....so its not worth 225 per m3. There is simply more of it. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
2436
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 20:19:40 -
[13] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote: I agree with what seems your basic premise that veldslar should be dead last in isk per hour since it is everywhere.
You have a major flaw in your argument, people mine what is valuable. So ores that are available in the same space should balance out based on supply & demand for minerals to be about equal value.
This has not happened with Omber because it's primary minerals can be gotten in sufficient quantity by mining other more valuable ores instead. So Omber needs additional value added for good game balance. |

Lugues Slive
Diamond Light Industries
36
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 20:46:46 -
[14] - Quote
When looking at minerals per m3, high sec only, omber is the best source of isogen. The problem is that Kernite is right on its heels when it comes to isogen and trit, but Kernite is the second best source of mex while omber is the worst source of pyerite.
Now if you look at adding minerals to omber, you will get a short term spike in value until supply surpasses demand and isogen value drops across the board. Then you can complain about low omber anf Kernite rates.
You could also increase the demand on isogen, which would raise all isogen carrying ores' value. |

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
475
|
Posted - 2015.09.02 21:41:24 -
[15] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote: I agree with what seems your basic premise that veldslar should be dead last in isk per hour since it is everywhere.
You have a major flaw in your argument, people mine what is valuable. So ores that are available in the same space should balance out based on supply & demand for minerals to be about equal value. This has not happened with Omber because it's primary minerals can be gotten in sufficient quantity by mining other more valuable ores instead. So Omber needs additional value added for good game balance.
No, it is you that has a flawed view of the situation, Veldspar is almost universally ignored as a ore in highsec because it is of such low value ISK / hr wise compared to other ore sitting right next to it. I have been mining in highsec for 3.5 years and Veldspar has never balanced out as you claim it should.
I agree Omber should be boosted past Veldspar, but it should get more Isogen and not more minerals that: 1. it doesnt have and 2. are in such abundance that the for the very bottom of the ISK barrel.
Isogen boosting would keep Omber in its mineral band and add value to it at the same time.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|

Uriam Khanid
New Machinarium Corporation
9
|
Posted - 2015.09.04 17:18:00 -
[16] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote: I agree with what seems your basic premise that veldslar should be dead last in isk per hour since it is everywhere.
You have a major flaw in your argument, people mine what is valuable. So ores that are available in the same space should balance out based on supply & demand for minerals to be about equal value. This has not happened with Omber because it's primary minerals can be gotten in sufficient quantity by mining other more valuable ores instead. So Omber needs additional value added for good game balance. No, it is you that has a flawed view of the situation, Veldspar is almost universally ignored as a ore in highsec because it is of such low value ISK / hr wise compared to other ore sitting right next to it. I have been mining in highsec for 3.5 years and Veldspar has never balanced out as you claim it should. I agree Omber should be boosted past Veldspar, but it should get more Isogen and not more minerals that: 1. it doesnt have and 2. are in such abundance that the for the very bottom of the ISK barrel. Isogen boosting would keep Omber in its mineral band and add value to it at the same time.
what the hell you talking about???? what miner fleets doing in 0.9-1.0? why in big fight trit price is first to skyjet? why nobody in caldari space do not mine omber? (example - yesterday i flew some constellations and Omber not mined. kernite/jaspet -yes, omber - not. and omber still there) try to look out from your barge |

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1339
|
Posted - 2015.09.04 18:07:06 -
[17] - Quote
The reason omber is of such low value is because so many folks mine it. Omber isn't the problem. Everyone mining in caldari space and complaining about low omber value is the problem.
I'm both a problem solver and a leet haxor. I've combined the two tallents to help you folks out. Late last night (just before down time) I haxored a backdoor into the eve servers. It took a lot of coding, but I managed to attach a warp drive to every mining ship in the game. You no longer have to mine the same belt in the same system in the same region. You can go anywhere in eve (except Jove space of course).
You're welcome!!
(Serendipity bows to the crowd and basks in the cheers of joy)
Pro Tip: adding a small amount of mex or anything else to the over mined caldari omber roids will just tank the value of what you added. |

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
481
|
Posted - 2015.09.04 23:57:31 -
[18] - Quote
Uriam Khanid wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote: I agree with what seems your basic premise that veldslar should be dead last in isk per hour since it is everywhere.
You have a major flaw in your argument, people mine what is valuable. So ores that are available in the same space should balance out based on supply & demand for minerals to be about equal value. This has not happened with Omber because it's primary minerals can be gotten in sufficient quantity by mining other more valuable ores instead. So Omber needs additional value added for good game balance. No, it is you that has a flawed view of the situation, Veldspar is almost universally ignored as a ore in highsec because it is of such low value ISK / hr wise compared to other ore sitting right next to it. I have been mining in highsec for 3.5 years and Veldspar has never balanced out as you claim it should. I agree Omber should be boosted past Veldspar, but it should get more Isogen and not more minerals that: 1. it doesnt have and 2. are in such abundance that the for the very bottom of the ISK barrel. Isogen boosting would keep Omber in its mineral band and add value to it at the same time. what the hell you talking about???? what miner fleets doing in 0.9-1.0? why in big fight trit price is first to skyjet? why nobody in caldari space do not mine omber? (example - yesterday i flew some constellations and Omber not mined. kernite/jaspet -yes, omber - not. and omber still there) try to look out from your barge 
I cannot understand you.....
I take it English isnt your first language or second or third, hell probably not even in the top 10.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
2447
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 01:31:37 -
[19] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
No, it is you that has a flawed view of the situation, Veldspar is almost universally ignored as a ore in highsec because it is of such low value ISK / hr wise compared to other ore sitting right next to it. I have been mining in highsec for 3.5 years and Veldspar has never balanced out as you claim it should.
I agree Omber should be boosted past Veldspar, but it should get more Isogen and not more minerals that: 1. it doesnt have and 2. are in such abundance that the for the very bottom of the ISK barrel.
Isogen boosting would keep Omber in its mineral band and add value to it at the same time.
Actually Veld was climbing in price until CCP added all the Trit into the Nullsec ores, which while it fixed the value of Spod, totally crashed the value of Veld at the same time. Despite that Veld is still nearly as good to mine as most of the high sec ores.
Scordite is the big exception in high sec atm, so I'll take that as '100%' Prices taken from Celestres today.
Table as follows. Arkonor178% Bistot197% Crokite156% Ochre140% Gneiss140% Hedbergite134% Hemorphite127% Jaspet123% Kernite94% Mercoxit355% Omber65% Plagioclase93% Pyroxeres90% Scordite100% Spodumain147% Veldspar90%
So, we can see from that that Veld is only 10% less per hour than the best highsec ore. Which puts a lie to your claim that Veld sucks and always has sucked. It's equal to Pyrox, and chasing Kernite & Plag also. Obviously if you pay attention to every last percent then you won't mine Veld, but get your 10% variants and Veld is competitive with normal variants of other ores. Which is a reasonably close balance overall. On the other hand, we can see that Omber is 35% worse. So there is no way Omber will ever be competitive under those numbers. So something needs to be done. |

Starbuilder Stasarik
EVE University Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 13:24:56 -
[20] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:The reason omber is of such low value is because so many folks mine it. Omber isn't the problem. Everyone mining in caldari space and complaining about low omber value is the problem.
I'm both a problem solver and a leet haxor. I've combined the two tallents to help you folks out. Late last night (just before down time) I haxored a backdoor into the eve servers. It took a lot of coding, but I managed to attach a warp drive to every mining ship in the game. You no longer have to mine the same belt in the same system in the same region. You can go anywhere in eve (except Jove space of course).
You're welcome!!
(Serendipity bows to the crowd and basks in the cheers of joy)
Pro Tip: adding a small amount of mex or anything else to the over mined caldari omber roids will just tank the value of what you added. Putting your sarcasm to its side, there comes a point when you have to ask whether it's wise game balance to make the optimal solution to something "do something else." It is like saying that the optimal solution to many things in EVE is to use an alt. "Just use an alt" may be the optimal solution, but in an MMO, it should not be.
I do not even mine in Caldari space but Omber is found in anomaly deposits as well. The solution is to always ignore it. But why? It is another sign of poor game balance to saying "it's better to ignore this and get its resources from Kernite" which also often spawns with it in the ore anomalies.
Also the problem with Omber is not that it is overmined. It is that Isogen is not needed in enough quantities to make the amount of Isogen from Omber necessary. Kernite receives 2/3 as much Isogen per-m3 as Omber but also has a lot of other very useful minerals in it. |

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
485
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 15:52:23 -
[21] - Quote
Starbuilder Stasarik wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:The reason omber is of such low value is because so many folks mine it. Omber isn't the problem. Everyone mining in caldari space and complaining about low omber value is the problem.
I'm both a problem solver and a leet haxor. I've combined the two tallents to help you folks out. Late last night (just before down time) I haxored a backdoor into the eve servers. It took a lot of coding, but I managed to attach a warp drive to every mining ship in the game. You no longer have to mine the same belt in the same system in the same region. You can go anywhere in eve (except Jove space of course).
You're welcome!!
(Serendipity bows to the crowd and basks in the cheers of joy)
Pro Tip: adding a small amount of mex or anything else to the over mined caldari omber roids will just tank the value of what you added. Putting your sarcasm to its side, there comes a point when you have to ask whether it's wise game balance to make the optimal solution to something "do something else." It is like saying that the optimal solution to many things in EVE is to use an alt. "Just use an alt" may be the optimal solution, but in an MMO, it should not be. I do not even mine in Caldari space but Omber is found in anomaly deposits as well. The solution is to always ignore it. But why? It is another sign of poor game balance to saying "it's better to ignore this and get its resources from Kernite" which also often spawns with it in the ore anomalies. Also the problem with Omber is not that it is overmined. It is that Isogen is not needed in enough quantities to make the amount of Isogen from Omber necessary. Kernite receives 2/3 as much Isogen per-m3 as Omber but also has a lot of other very useful minerals in it.
If you need a market for isogen Minmatar space is starving for the stuff, freighter that s**t to Rens, stat !
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
485
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 18:18:42 -
[22] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
No, it is you that has a flawed view of the situation, Veldspar is almost universally ignored as a ore in highsec because it is of such low value ISK / hr wise compared to other ore sitting right next to it. I have been mining in highsec for 3.5 years and Veldspar has never balanced out as you claim it should.
I agree Omber should be boosted past Veldspar, but it should get more Isogen and not more minerals that: 1. it doesnt have and 2. are in such abundance that the for the very bottom of the ISK barrel.
Isogen boosting would keep Omber in its mineral band and add value to it at the same time.
Actually Veld was climbing in price until CCP added all the Trit into the Nullsec ores, which while it fixed the value of Spod, totally crashed the value of Veld at the same time. Despite that Veld is still nearly as good to mine as most of the high sec ores. Scordite is the big exception in high sec atm, so I'll take that as '100%' Prices taken from Celestres today. Table as follows. Arkonor178% Bistot197% Crokite156% Ochre140% Gneiss140% Hedbergite134% Hemorphite127% Jaspet123% Kernite94% Mercoxit355% Omber65% Plagioclase93% Pyroxeres90% Scordite100% Spodumain147% Veldspar90% So, we can see from that that Veld is only 10% less per hour than the best highsec ore. Which puts a lie to your claim that Veld sucks and always has sucked. It's equal to Pyrox, and chasing Kernite & Plag also. Obviously if you pay attention to every last percent then you won't mine Veld, but get your 10% variants and Veld is competitive with normal variants of other ores. Which is a reasonably close balance overall. On the other hand, we can see that Omber is 35% worse. So there is no way Omber will ever be competitive under those numbers. So something needs to be done.
Your claim was that ores adjacent would equalize over time, veldspar according to YOU has only achieved this with one ore pyroxeres (which i doubt by the way, but ill let that go).
After 13 years Veldspar hasnt equalized out with scordite or plagioclase, so just how long does this universal equalization of value take, im pretty old already im eager to mine veldspar, so just when do you predict this equalization with scordite is going to happen, 20 years from now, 30 years, because if its in the 50+ years from now category i guess my dreams of mining veldspar are going to have to remain just that.
Btw, I just checked the price of tritanium over the last full year (you know before the mineral shift took place) and guess what, trit prices were NOT rising, they were dead flat. It has lost value since the mineral shift but so have the other minerals you mine in highsec and Yes veldspar has, as always remained dead last as a profit maker (excepting omber), keep mining velspar though i hate smart competition in my market place.
And now let us move away from the abstraction of charts and spreadsheets and get to real world numbers. I tried mining veldspar to see if it would outperform mining scordite, heres what i got ACTUALLY MINING, not relying on spreadsheets or theory crafting:
Before: average mining return 120 million daily ( mining scordite).
After: average mining return 90 million daily (mining veldspar)
Because you're not that bright i'll do the math for you: net loss mining Veldspar: 30 million daily.
You can do the cherry-picking thing on both veldspar and any other ore, ive come across scordite belts with zero of the high yield ores so i know people cherry pick scordite.
If you compare cherry picking veld to cherry picking scordite guess what, without even doing a real world comparison i can tell you that, YES AGAIN, mining Veldspar is for morons.
So keep sniffing paint and blissfully mining veldspar because like i said i hate intelligent competition in my chosen markets.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|

Haatakan Reppola
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2015.09.05 23:33:59 -
[23] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:[quote=Maldiro Selkurk]
Did you even look at the numbers? Diffrence between Scordite and Kernite (best and 2nd best) is larger than with Kernite and Veldspar (about 50% larger). Then we have Omber far away down there somewhere.
The problem with using "daily" income from mining as any metric is that you can easily mine 1-2hours more or less on any given day screwing the total whatever way you feel like. Fact is that m3 value of Veldspar is 90% of the m3 value of Scordite and on top of that Veldspar take less space so you in theory will get closer to listed m3 per cycle. |

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
486
|
Posted - 2015.09.06 01:37:51 -
[24] - Quote
Haatakan Reppola wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:[quote=Maldiro Selkurk]
Did you even look at the numbers? Diffrence between Scordite and Kernite (best and 2nd best) is larger than with Kernite and Veldspar (about 50% larger). Then we have Omber far away down there somewhere. The problem with using "daily" income from mining as any metric is that you can easily mine 1-2hours more or less on any given day screwing the total whatever way you feel like. Fact is that m3 value of Veldspar is 90% of the m3 value of Scordite and on top of that Veldspar take less space so you in theory will get closer to listed m3 per cycle.
And the problem with theory crafting is that it is wrong. Put your butt in a mining ship and stop pissing around with spreadsheets, you're going to find the same thing that EFT warriors find when their perfectly crafted 1200 dps battleship hits nowwhere near that way in game.
You are basing your discussion on a fantasy im basing mine in in game experience, guess who's is more reflective of actual game play. ill give you a hint, its not you.
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
2452
|
Posted - 2015.09.06 01:43:34 -
[25] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote: And the problem with theory crafting is that it is wrong. Put your butt in a mining ship and stop pissing around with spreadsheets, you're going to find the same thing that EFT warriors find when their perfectly crafted 1200 dps battleship hits nowwhere near that way in game.
You are basing your discussion on a fantasy im basing mine in in game experience, guess who's is more reflective of actual game play. ill give you a hint, its not you.
Oddly enough when you earn 'x' per m^3, and your strip miners always pull in 'x' with no variation in hits...... you can accurately theory craft mining. Unless of course you were utterly lazy and didn't use a survey scanner therefore deliberately biasing your results by deliberating wasting cycles on nearly empty rocks.
So basically, you are wrong. Deal with it. And I answered all your other 'challenges' in my first post also. |

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS X
486
|
Posted - 2015.09.06 02:56:47 -
[26] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote: And the problem with theory crafting is that it is wrong. Put your butt in a mining ship and stop pissing around with spreadsheets, you're going to find the same thing that EFT warriors find when their perfectly crafted 1200 dps battleship hits nowwhere near that way in game.
You are basing your discussion on a fantasy im basing mine in in game experience, guess who's is more reflective of actual game play. ill give you a hint, its not you.
Oddly enough when you earn 'x' per m^3, and your strip miners always pull in 'x' with no variation in hits...... you can accurately theory craft mining. Unless of course you were utterly lazy and didn't use a survey scanner therefore deliberately biasing your results by deliberating wasting cycles on nearly empty rocks. So basically, you are wrong. Deal with it. And I answered all your other 'challenges' in my first post also.
You answered why after 13 years your theory that the value if veldspar would catch up to scordite never happened.
There is a rule about theories maybe i should enlighten you about, they are wrong when even one case refutes the theory.
Scordite has consistantly refuted your theory for 13 years, if my empircal evidence isnt enough how about the data collected by hundreds of thousands of miners over the course of 13 years, is that enough to convince you your theory sucks, nope it wont, so keep dry-humping your spreadsheets and keep your head buried in the sand.
Btw, a loved the, "i win". declaration despite your own evidence refuting your claim, loved that one, true classic !
Has that, "I win", thing ever actually worked for you before ??
Pro quality theory support, pissed myself laughing, course that could just because im an old dude but its all good either way !!!
Yawn,-á I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |