|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Aiyshimin
Fistful of Finns Triumvirate.
539
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 18:40:11 -
[1] - Quote
Application buff was exactly what was needed, props on that. Drone MWD speed is also a very good solution.
Like others already mentioned, bigger locking range improvements would have increased their variety in MMJD tactics (from evasive to offensive), and few of the BCs have ridiculously big signatures.
Anyway, fairly optimistic about how these changes were made! |
Aiyshimin
Fistful of Finns Triumvirate.
540
|
Posted - 2015.09.12 07:24:53 -
[2] - Quote
Moraguth wrote:I don't understand how a huge increase to the mass of a ship (Prophecy, I'm looking at you), is considered a buff/benefit?
Increasing the mass and speed mitigates the slowing effect of the additional mass from plates, as they are now a smaller portion of the total mass. |
Aiyshimin
Fistful of Finns Triumvirate.
540
|
Posted - 2015.09.12 07:46:10 -
[3] - Quote
Is there a special reason for Myrmidon's miniature cargo hold?
And a question that keeps me wondering- why gallente is cursed with the biggest signatures? This completely ruins the intended use of ships like the Eris, and at BC level strongly counters the already weak rep bonus. |
Aiyshimin
Fistful of Finns Triumvirate.
541
|
Posted - 2015.09.12 08:26:16 -
[4] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Doris Dragonbreath wrote:This buff does not include T2 BC's? I believe these could use some love as well? Best love they can get is for t3 cruisers to lose the ability to fit warfare links and be nullified and fit a cov ops cloak at the same time.
Id prefer making Command Processors fittable on BC hulls only, maybe caps and mining support too if needed. |
Aiyshimin
Fistful of Finns Triumvirate.
550
|
Posted - 2015.09.13 07:57:32 -
[5] - Quote
Not sure if this has been discussed already, but a logical reason for Myrm's popularity in the stats could well be solely it's slot layout, allowing it to fit MMJD with another prop and everything else. |
Aiyshimin
Fistful of Finns Triumvirate.
552
|
Posted - 2015.09.18 10:37:55 -
[6] - Quote
Nevil Kincade wrote: To run it's MWD after the new balance changes I would still expect the ship to need a cap booster which costs so much power grid that you can't fit a 1600mm plate anymore at which point i would choose any other BC over the Harb (if i was looking for an armor tank). So you can basically choose between pest and cholera either having:
- no PG for tank - or no CAP for propulsion - or no CAP for lasers
But what will really keep people from using the ship again is the fact that one of the hull bonuses is ****. I could live with the Harb running dry after a couple of minutes and even with the implications of fitting a cap booster but other hulls dont have the cap issue and offer a 2nd bonus. Screw the Harb, not going back to it.
[Harbinger, test] 1600mm Steel Plates II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Damage Control II Heat Sink II Heat Sink II
50MN Microwarpdrive II Medium Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 800 X5 Prototype Engine Enervator Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I
Focused Medium Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency M Focused Medium Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency M Focused Medium Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency M Focused Medium Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency M Focused Medium Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency M Focused Medium Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency M Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I
Medium Anti-Explosive Pump I Medium Anti-Kinetic Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Infiltrator II x5 Warrior II x5
- absolutely no PG issues.
as a comparison, your "any other armor BC":
[Brutix, test] 1600mm Steel Plates II [empty low slot] [empty low slot] [empty low slot] [empty low slot] [empty low slot]
50MN Microwarpdrive II [empty med slot] [empty med slot] [empty med slot]
Heavy Ion Blaster II, Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Antimatter Charge M Heavy Ion Blaster II, Antimatter Charge M [empty high slot]
- already requires a 5% PG implant to fit. |
|
|
|