EVE Search - KIA Press Release - Contract Announcement

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

KIA Press Release - Contract Announcement

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Jonathan Peterbilt Caldari Tyrell Corp	Posted - 2006.12.18 07:40:00 - [61] Edited by: Jonathan Peterbilt on 18/12/2006 07:41:00 Originally by: Nadija Originally by: Spiderweb Edited by: Spiderweb on 16/12/2006 17:07:27 IAC made a huge error on picking up a fight for no serious reason with a very serious advesary. Now they pay the price for their arrogance it seems. /bb IAC tbh IAC just wanted a striaght fight with ISS, ISS were the ones who escalated the war by brining in mercs to do the fighting for them when they have the capablities.... I agree, its totaly not fair they decided to fight back, when all you wanted is to shoot them when they mine or haul...
Crellion Art of War Anarchy Empire	Posted - 2006.12.18 11:45:00 - [62] Originally by: Raem Civrie Originally by: Halafian Well, here are the words of your leadership: Originally by: Raem Civrie Anyway. Nice stations, we'll take them! Dude, I'm not a leader. I'm an anti-leader; I'm the whole reason FOR leaders. I'm technically a director but my applicable power within IAC is limited to shouting alot. Which, you know. I do. I shouted that particular bit while still wrecked after the Tournament and didn't know any of the details, since for me (and the rest of the IAC grunts) information about the standings change was kept off until the last moment, probably because of security leaks. Stop trying to use me in your propaganda. It's silly. You shouldnt have been wrecked after the tournament. You guys were amazing and no one can say anything but well done. Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim.
welsh wizard Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency	Posted - 2006.12.18 11:52:00 - [63] Serious question LV. Has the enemy ever had more ships than you? Originally by: anonymous If you're being chased by a police dog, try not to go through a tunnel, then on to a little seesaw, then jump through a hoop of fire. They're trained for that.
Bacilius The Tidemark Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.18 11:57:00 - [64] Edited by: Bacilius on 18/12/2006 11:58:04 Originally by: Jonathan Peterbilt Edited by: Jonathan Peterbilt on 18/12/2006 07:41:00 Originally by: Nadija Originally by: Spiderweb Edited by: Spiderweb on 16/12/2006 17:07:27 IAC made a huge error on picking up a fight for no serious reason with a very serious advesary. Now they pay the price for their arrogance it seems. /bb IAC tbh IAC just wanted a striaght fight with ISS, ISS were the ones who escalated the war by brining in mercs to do the fighting for them when they have the capablities.... I agree, its totaly not fair they decided to fight back, when all you wanted is to shoot them when they mine or haul... Like your defunct Cloaking Coalition? Seriously, go play WOW with the teenies Tyrell. Stop trying to sound relevant in the only forum (pardon the pun) left open to you...
Bluebear8 Orion Ore International Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.18 20:20:00 - [65] We strayed off topic, it seems. Welcome back, and GF, Fixians. IAC loves more targets, (except it is sure to cause a lagfest, this time, with LV now coming ... it is time to stop counting and start drinking!) Lagfest usually defaults to the defenders with BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH! So, bring the entire EvE community back SOUTH for a BLUE SCREEN CHRISTMAS. [We love your salvage ... ] Break open the HOLIDAY SPIRITS, it's PARTY TIME in JZV! Oh, don't forget to ask BD how many ISS POS got attacked by us evil boozers. How funny it is to see you try and spin IAC as an ebil empire intent on universal domination when the ONLY POS WARFARE has been on IAC TURF. It's so funny to watch a little PvP turned into a POS survival warfare... <yawns> ... We'll have fun to defend ourselves against the "neutral" .. err, no ... the "defense-only" ... err, no ... the "non-aggressive" ... err, no. What are they called, nowadays? What is ISS calling itself in its POS CAMPAIGN against us? Yeah, their new "spin" for the new ISS CAMPAIGN TO TAKE OVER IAC's STATIONs? Oh, yes. ISS is "non-political." Right-O, m8. Non-political. Well, IAC is just as NON-POLITICAL as ISS. The ONLY difference between ISS and IAC is that IAC hasn't attacked anyone's POS or STATION in this conflict (except with shuttles). In EvE-O, actions speak MUCH louder than words. And, we've lived through a long history of ISS "action". As their actions are speaking louder every day, I think ISS just wants to try and eliminate the competition, because our prices were so much better than their prices! Welcome back, Fixians. I do hope to see one of your ships for a few volleys before the BLUE SCREEN of DEATH envelops your attack fleet. It's not your fault... it seems ISS just sent out too many invitations to the party! So, the only solution is to add MORE ALCOHOL!
Crozon Crozon Corp	Posted - 2006.12.19 01:40:00 - [66] Originally by: Bluebear8 What is ISS calling itself in its POS CAMPAIGN against us? Yeah, their new "spin" for the new ISS CAMPAIGN TO TAKE OVER IAC's STATIONs? Oh, yes. ISS is "non-political." Right-O, m8. Non-political. Well, IAC is just as NON-POLITICAL as ISS. The ONLY difference between ISS and IAC is that IAC hasn't attacked anyone's POS or STATION in this conflict (except with shuttles). In EvE-O, actions speak MUCH louder than words. And, we've lived through a long history of ISS "action". Sometimes words can speak louder, especially those statements by IAC leaders (posted by them) stating that ISS pos's were not beyond attack. IAC wanted a fight on their terms (easy ganks of hauler and miners). Now the decision to make ISS -10, turn and bites you on the rear, you complain about blah-non political, non neutral blah. The funniest thing about this, is that ISS changed their charter so they wouldn't have their hands tied the next time a friendly alliance was attacked by people who asked for a NAP right before (ie what happened in Prohibition Part I). So, in future, they could stand by alliances like IAC! The irony makes me giggle some.. Luckily, the charter has changed so don't expect a NAP this time
tigress Gallente Genco Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.19 10:50:00 - [67] I usually stay away from forums. They have their uses, and propaganda is not one of them I like. Anyways. Omg, this is hilarious! We wanted to pew pew! And we got to (and ****loads too). Happeh happeh! Kudos to ISS for having deep pockets atleast ;). Let the fights be lag free and local smackless. /tigress, IAC president.
ScreamingLord Sutch Hand in Mouth	Posted - 2006.12.20 00:52:00 - [68] Are you guys still using the same killboard? I don't see one kill for the whole contract to date?
DeadProphet Black Eclipse Corp Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.12.20 01:35:00 - [69] Originally by: Nadija Originally by: Spiderweb Edited by: Spiderweb on 16/12/2006 17:07:27 IAC made a huge error on picking up a fight for no serious reason with a very serious advesary. Now they pay the price for their arrogance it seems. /bb IAC tbh IAC just wanted a striaght fight with ISS, ISS were the ones who escalated the war by brining in mercs to do the fighting for them when they have the capablities.... when you declare war on someone you face the consequences of that action.....tbh it seems IAC didn't think it all the way through before jumping in. I'm guessing they will next time :P
Spiderweb Caldari Freelance Unincorporated Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2006.12.20 02:37:00 - [70] Edited by: Spiderweb on 20/12/2006 02:37:26 Originally by: DeadProphet when you declare war on someone you face the consequences of that action.....tbh it seems IAC didn't think it all the way through before jumping in. I'm guessing they will next time :P The question is, will IAC be ever again in a state to be able to have a "next time" ? :D ----------------------------------------------- "Light, in the Darkest of Hours..."

KIAEddZ Caldari KIA Corp	Posted - 2006.12.20 09:46:00 - [71] Originally by: ScreamingLord Sutch Are you guys still using the same killboard? I don't see one kill for the whole contract to date? www.kia-corp.com is our website, links to kb and forums etc there. Different hosting as our hosting gave up the ghost and we lost everything a while back... :( KIA EVE Home
maGz The Priory Shroud Of Darkness	Posted - 2006.12.20 09:56:00 - [72] Originally by: Spiderweb Edited by: Spiderweb on 20/12/2006 02:37:26 Originally by: DeadProphet when you declare war on someone you face the consequences of that action.....tbh it seems IAC didn't think it all the way through before jumping in. I'm guessing they will next time :P The question is, will IAC be ever again in a state to be able to have a "next time" ? :D LV and MC wont be there forever and ISS sure as hell can't do anything by themselves, so I'm sure there'll be a next time ____________ The Priory Killboard
KIAEddZ Caldari KIA Corp	Posted - 2006.12.20 10:05:00 - [73] Originally by: maGz LV and MC wont be there forever and ISS sure as hell can't do anything by themselves, so I'm sure there'll be a next time LV could be there a long time, they may well be looking for a new home... (only joking, couldn't resist) As long as IAC don't let this go too far, they will be cool. But dont doubt, losing all your stations, being forced back to empire, will have a MASSIVE effect on IAC, you will lose members, those that stay will lose belief. IAC have made a mistake on this one, they underestimated the people that have a interest in ISS well being, which is great shame, KIA like IAC a lot, good guys with good heads for fun, and mostly annebriated to boot. Get out of this situation, before you cross the line, dont rely on LV and MC leaving etc etc, that will not be the answer tothe questions you have. KIA EVE Home
maGz The Priory Shroud Of Darkness	Posted - 2006.12.20 10:24:00 - [74] Originally by: KIAEddZ Originally by: maGz LV and MC wont be there forever and ISS sure as hell can't do anything by themselves, so I'm sure there'll be a next time LV could be there a long time, they may well be looking for a new home... (only joking, couldn't resist) As long as IAC don't let this go too far, they will be cool. But dont doubt, losing all your stations, being forced back to empire, will have a MASSIVE effect on IAC, you will lose members, those that stay will lose belief. IAC have made a mistake on this one, they underestimated the people that have a interest in ISS well being, which is great shame, KIA like IAC a lot, good guys with good heads for fun, and mostly annebriated to boot. Get out of this situation, before you cross the line, dont rely on LV and MC leaving etc etc, that will not be the answer tothe questions you have. Of course losing stations would have a massive impact on IAC, like it would on any other alliance. Personally I see it go two ways when/if they lose the stations: 1. IAC completely fall apart. Everyone leaves and IAC as an entity is gone (I've been in alliance with these guys and I very much doubt this will happen) 2. IAC will get stronger (clichT 4tw), and ISS will have a hell of a time managing 5 stations with an alliance basing out of NPC-space 6 jumps away, constantly harrasing them. LV holding the stations would be a horrible tactical choice unless they lose all their other stations (probably not utopia in the future). MC is, as we all know, on a retainer so obviously any real threat to the stations would once again result in them coming down flexing their muscles, however I highly doubt MC can continue the success should they be on their own. In the end, we'll have some interesting months ahead of us, and I'm sure we'll all have fun ____________ The Priory Killboard
Aeon Yakati Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.12.20 10:27:00 - [75] Originally by: welsh wizard Serious question LV. Has the enemy ever had more ships than you? Err.. yea

Eldo Davip Forum Moderator Interstellar Services Department	Posted - 2006.12.20 16:16:00 - [76] Thread cleaned. Please keep it civil in here folks. No need to resort to name calling. Retorting to flames and insults will only get you in more trouble, it's best to email us. ___ Email Us \| Forum Rules \| Our Website EvE +NLINE - T+TALHELLDEATH SUPPORTER



Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.