| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Beaches
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
4
   |
Posted - 2011.12.10 10:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Jack Traynor wrote:Just another in-game thing meant for the big boys. Nothing to see here, move along. This statement is so untrue that I feel bad even answering it. Here is the deal, the fleet is moving over the next few days and you are ALL welcome to engage. It is not for the big boys or the small boys or the medium boys: it is for everyone. I am really sorry that you cannot organize a fleet or join one who that is effective against us. Be a leader and make EVE what you want it to be.
Yeah, when Padro drives his van to the playground, the candy isn't for the little children its for everyone, he's there for everyone. It doesn't matter that he went to a child's playground. Here's the deal, the van is moving over the next few days and EVERYONE is welcome. I'm really sorry you can't take the time out of your schedule to come to the playground, that's your fault.
duuuurrr
This logic is so sound and the average person is brilliant. |
Beaches
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2011.12.10 11:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:....
You just said PL and years of unchallenged moon income. |
Beaches
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.10 13:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
I couldn't care less about the rewards, maybe if the event was in Amarr, I might undock and try to scoop something. I do care that CCP is hopelessly beholden to 0.0 power blocks. Not only because of inherent bias, through the fact that their CSM is all goons, but because the majority of their alts are deeply involved in these 0.0 alliances. This large reward to certain 0.0 entities amounting to a mini , extralegal T20 incident, dev corruption and interference with the sandbox. |
Beaches
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.10 15:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:\
carebears huddling in high sec simply deserve less because they are not playing the game to its fullest.
.
Who decides how to play a game to it's fullest? In a sandbox there is no 'right' or 'wrong' ; 'full' or 'empty' way, you can create for yourself what YOU want and it's full for you. On the beach when I was young sometimes me and my sistersand brothers would dig giant holes which went down to the water and cover them with a blanket and some sand so people would fall in, sometimes we built little castles ect. Complete opposite, both fun and good at the time.
CCP rewarding their 0.0 alliance mates and CSM buddies because they think living in a perpetual circle jerk is the 'right' way to play the game is inherently wrong.
It's not as if 0.0 is even interesting to most players anyway (or they would live there). Are the supers what make it so interesting and praise/reward worthy? The blobs? The napfests? It's a matter of opinion and that's my point. Some people like that **** (obviously some CCP devs) It's nothing which CCP as a company should show favoritism over. It only shows corruption and bias. |
Beaches
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.12.10 17:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:
carebears huddling in high sec simply deserve less because they are not playing the game to its fullest.
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:
You seem to take the impression that I am making a judgement about who deserves what, well I am not I am just pointing out that in a sand box a player can choose how he wants to play.
|
Beaches
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.12.10 18:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Last time I checked the map high sec was more dangerous than 0.0
(as if hiding in no mans land ratting behind vast intel networks would be dangerous.. what did I expect vOv) |
Beaches
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.12.10 18:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
. |
| |
|