EVE Search - The Wrath of the Shareholders

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

The Wrath of the Shareholders

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Thundirr Amarr Mercurialis Inc. Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.18 02:22:00 - [1] ** Sorry im going to get chewed out for this but... * How did ISS like it when we attacked their POS's on the first day of the war in our "premeditated act of war with intentions of taking over multiple ISS stations" I noticed not a single shot was fired at any of your POS's ISS even though we had numerical advantage for the better part of 3 days. tinfoil had Furthermore when you act like we were so after your stations i say this: "We set you to -10" who knows what is going to happen. There may be pos shooty shooty" (MAY.. WHO KNOWS wtf is going to happen. But DUH we did not go after your POS's you instead go for sovernty in our space.. hmm advantagous huh. With the way your acting saying this is all funded by 'private investors' and the rest of ISS gets profit from it, that seems like ISS is getting a nice bouce from this war. It actually seems alot like ISS wanted this all along. Almost like they were behind the first war, 1) MC stages out of ISS space (yeah yeah 'we didnt know we are totally innocent) for like what 4 DAYS. 2) ISS attempts to stop help from comming WHEN TOLD the help is for us. (yeah yeah we will say it was some issue.) 'but we are your friends IAC good luck we are 'neutral' so stick it to them snicker' Share holders mean nothing in ISS they have NO say, its the few with the big pockets saying "Hmm i want their system because its making more money then ours. Its just business right?" Being a slave owner is 'just business'right. "im the guy in comman of ISS.. but my insanely wealthy business people are actually incharge.... Oh snap they paid the mercs to go after you but since its not 'officially paid for by ISS it doesnt count' Butterdog you can spin it all you want to. ISS is after our stations and our space, they have been before this war started. And PRIVATE investors were most likely behind the McFix war. (ohh yeah i dont have proof on that but really who needs it, its rather obvious.) Our command has stated several times that we wanted to open up the eyes of those in ISS leadership that we were NOT happy with conditions. IAC set ISS to -10 but did not engage in any attack on their capital assets. Oh got a little pew pew in your systems for a little while and.. blah blah.. so what. We ran around your systems being a pest. We are going to enjoy this fight. Seems your investors with their DEEP pockets are all about protecting their space when they are really after enlarging it. GL with your plans ISS. I am really going to enjoy seeing how this works out. You cant stop the beer and you cant keep us from making it. PS. Awsome showing of capital assets. Great time was had and much booze was consumed. Cant wait to be there for big show in a couple days. To general grunts of ISS and MC good luck much respect to all. This post is my own personal reflection on events and i am NOT an official IAC rep. Do not take what i say as anything close to official.
Thundirr Amarr Mercurialis Inc. Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.21 15:21:00 - [2] Originally by: Press Officer Quote: you refused to say you wouldn't take ISS stations. See this is the main point for the thick people out there ...... Welcome to hell IAC, you wanted to be greedy, rob blind the neutral investors of Eve and now you will lose everything. Sux being you, don't it. Hint .... start begging and use lots and lots of Lub You know people that have no clue shouldnt post. AT NO POINT DID IAC EVER ATTACK ANY ISS POS OR STATION. FOR 3 DAYS WE HAD FULL ACCCESS TO ISS SPACE SURROUNDING F4 FOR 3 DAYS WE COULD HAVE ATTACKED ANY POS/STATION BUT DID NOT. Everyone thinks we were going to take ISS stations. Yeah our actions should speak loud enough there. As for robbing ISS blind? LOL right. This war only proves what we wanted it to. ISS are not some neutral Alliance. Its all business for them. And Business is most certainly NOT neutral. We wanted to show that the ISS charter is not something that works. It makes ISS just like any other alliance. Not Neutral. Not A Fence Sitter. Press Officer you need to seriously get your fact straight. Oh BTW loved your intial post about IAC planning on taking ISS stations. Seems IAC sure did plan for it. Hey we had weeks to plan for it. 3 Days to make our plans real, and all of the ISS POS destroyed and sovernty attacked proves it.... oh wait we didnt do any of that. Your neutral investors... thats a funny statement. Whatever. IAC will prevail. When a neighbor trys to tell you that he isnt pleased with what you have been doing. Several times he tells you. Hey could you please not do that? And you dont realy listen to him.. YOu nod your head but do nothing. One day your neighbor says. I have told you a dozen times to cut this out, im sorry its come to this. And he punches you in the face. You dont burn down his house because you have a bloody nose. IAC Tried to tell ISS they werent happy. We tried several times. When we got fed up we punched ISS in the face because nothing else was working. Now ISS is attempting to burn down our house. Thats what ISS is doing to its neighbor. Instead of trying to work out differences they are going for burning down the house. Grats ISS. GL to you. And thanks for proving our point. I in no way am an offical rep of IAC. I just say what i think
Thundirr Amarr Mercurialis Inc. Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.21 18:37:00 - [3] Originally by: Press Officer Edited by: Press Officer on 21/12/2006 16:04:02 Quote: You know people that have no clue shouldnt post. AT NO POINT DID IAC EVER ATTACK ANY ISS POS OR STATION. FOR 3 DAYS WE HAD FULL ACCCESS TO ISS SPACE SURROUNDING F4 FOR 3 DAYS WE COULD HAVE ATTACKED ANY POS/STATION BUT DID NOT. Everyone thinks we were going to take ISS stations. Yeah our actions should speak loud enough there. As for robbing ISS blind? LOL right. This war only proves what we wanted it to. ISS are not some neutral Alliance. Its all business for them. And Business is most certainly NOT neutral. We wanted to show that the ISS charter is not something that works. It makes ISS just like any other alliance. Not Neutral. Not A Fence Sitter. Press Officer you need to seriously get your fact straight. Oh BTW loved your intial post about IAC planning on taking ISS stations. Seems IAC sure did plan for it. Hey we had weeks to plan for it. 3 Days to make our plans real, and all of the ISS POS destroyed and sovernty attacked proves it.... oh wait we didnt do any of that. Your neutral investors... thats a funny statement. Whatever. IAC will prevail. When a neighbor trys to tell you that he isnt pleased with what you have been doing. Several times he tells you. Hey could you please not do that? And you dont realy listen to him.. YOu nod your head but do nothing. One day your neighbor says. I have told you a dozen times to cut this out, im sorry its come to this. And he punches you in the face. You dont burn down his house because you have a bloody nose. IAC Tried to tell ISS they werent happy. We tried several times. When we got fed up we punched ISS in the face because nothing else was working. Now ISS is attempting to burn down our house. Thats what ISS is doing to its neighbor. Instead of trying to work out differences they are going for burning down the house. Grats ISS. GL to you. And thanks for proving our point. I'm sure the IAC need to operate a "Put my foot in it filter" .... No plans to take the ISS stations ........... thats so funny expecially as I was in the intial discussions weeks ago when certain corporations were informed of the plans.... chatlogs are a wounderfull thing but maybe I would be "very very very quite" before you make yourself look really really silly. Also it was stated by your "own leadership" when the ISS clearly asked "will you be attacking POS's" the response back was "that cannot be ruled out" Lets have a little look at the facts ... 1) The IAC declared war on the ISS ........... fact 2) The attack was planned ahead and the outcome was to be a total attack ...... fact (I was in the conversations) 3) The IAC stated that POS's wars are "not" to be ruled out .............. fact IAC statements .......... Fiction PROVE IT. I want to see who you are and i want to see this conversation. Seems you are also in charge of the IAC Capital fleet and know where our cap ships were and what they were doing when this invasion took place. You completely missed the point of my post anyway. IAC Wanted to get the attention of ISS. Play dense if you want to. Play stupid if you want to. Fact remains. IAC DID NOT attack ISS Sovernty. IAC DID NOT move capital ships. ISS Used this as a chance to expand and their friends jumped on board. ISS has played blind to the fact that we never even attempted to go after sov. SO what it was vague but nothing was followed up on. Hey lets act like we are going to get attacked by the omfguberposdestoryers of doom and kill IAC now. (btw no omfguberposdestroyers of doom) ever attacked us.. oh well no biggy. Get off it Press Officer. ISS has been looking down on us since we moved into Catch.
Thundirr Amarr Mercurialis Inc. Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.21 19:43:00 - [4] Originally by: Cyllaina Quote: IAC Tried to tell ISS they werent happy. We tried several times. When we got fed up we punched ISS in the face because nothing else was working. Now ISS is attempting to burn down our house. Thats what ISS is doing to its neighbor. Instead of trying to work out differences they are going for burning down the house. Grats ISS. GL to you. And thanks for proving our point. If my neighbor punched me in those nose for whatever reason, instead of burning his house down, i'd take him to court and move him out of his house, after I own it. That sounds more like what ISS is doing, they told their shareholders, hey... These guys just assaulted me, I want to hire a lawyer to fight this (MC). LV/FIX/Whoever else are judge and jury, they decided in favor of ISS and are forcing IAC to turn over their assets to ISS. See? Doesn't that fit more accurately? I still wish IAC the best though. No what you would get is a lost friend and a unhappy neighbor. And for a simple assault, maybe a small fine. And lets be honest. BD has already stated that thelosses that we inflicted are next to nothing for them. So the bloody nose is actually a bruised shoulder. And the house burning is more of an atomic bomb in your bedroom. Proof of IAC not going after their sovernty is 3 days of No attack on their systems. But still Our point has been proven. Beat us up all you want.
Thundirr Amarr Mercurialis Inc. Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.21 21:48:00 - [5] Yay im a moron, and evidently the single voice of a grunt who has no diplomatic power or any authority reflects the entirety of IAC. Also, ISS are saints... Its just like winning in the special olympics. GL with the forum wars.. its all spin now. Official nobody... i have no power, no say, and thats just about all.
Thundirr Amarr Mercurialis Inc. Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.22 00:24:00 - [6] Originally by: Xander Magnus Originally by: Thundirr IAC Tried to tell ISS they werent happy. We tried several times. When we got fed up we punched ISS in the face because nothing else was working. Now ISS is attempting to burn down our house. Thats what ISS is doing to its neighbor. Instead of trying to work out differences they are going for burning down the house. Grats ISS. GL to you. And thanks for proving our point. You're not entirely accurate there, let me help you. You punch ISS in the face, ISS says: 'please don't hurt my wife and children!', you say:'I can't promise you I wont'. And now everyone in IAC is telling: if we DID hurt your wife and children, only THEN were you supposed to kick us in the nuts. I'm getting fed up with these lame excuses and am loosing all respect for IAC. Stop implying ISS wants your outposts after you hinted interest in theirs. If you had offered peace right after the first punches were dealt I'm positive ISS would have accepted it. Now it's probably too late and you're using the forums to try to score some points, but instead now you even lost your honour. I in no way am an offical rep of IAC. I just say what i think Please avoid changing my statements. Thanks
Thundirr Amarr Mercurialis Inc. Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.22 00:32:00 - [7] Originally by: Marovinchian i honestly can't believe this conversation about who shot who and who attacked outposts whatever blah blah is still going. Point is...ISS hired out and brought in enough people to do it and are getting it done. I think one thing that needs to be clarified though, would be if ISS plans to continue to call themselves a neutral alliance when they are blatantly agressively going after other political entities in eve's assetts. I also think that the continued usage by iss and the parties that represent them of the fact that iac set iss to -10 as the catalyst for near immediate effecting of a VERY large force being brought in to take iac's space is belittling to the intelligence of the eve community.....this is something ISS already have had on thier mind and were just waiting for the proper opportunity politically to make it happen. This just about sums it up.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.