| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Oddsodz
Rifterlings Zero.Four Ops
166
|
Posted - 2015.09.25 20:56:44 -
[1] - Quote
Dear CCP
I Wonder if it would be possible for you to make a detailed analysis of my last 12 months of Pilot or Pilots vs Pilot or Pilots combat in the LowSec regions of New Eden.
What I am looking for is a report (with if possible some sort of graph porn) on how many ships I have lost in PvP when my opponents may or may not have had a fleet bonus from a warfare boosting module. I would like to think that it would be easy to work out by just listing all my losses over the last 12 months and then listing all the opponents listed on said lost mails and then looking to see if any of the opponents was in a fleet, If that fleet had a booster in the same system with an active warfare module at the time of my lost as dated on the lost mail.
Things I also would like to see if is, How many times I have lost ships when I was in a fleet that had a active warfare compared to when I have not had any boosting warfare module active in said fleet.
I Fully understand that the above information will take time to collect and correlate. But I do feel it would make for an interesting case study for metrics on how much or little the wide spread the use warfare links are used in LowSec space.
Thank you for taking the time to read my post.
Oddsodz |

Paranoid Loyd
7042
|
Posted - 2015.09.25 21:25:04 -
[2] - Quote
Yeah right
"Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata
Fix the Prospect!
|

Valkin Mordirc
1513
|
Posted - 2015.09.26 22:39:17 -
[3] - Quote
Show us on the doll where the Tengu touched you.
#DeleteTheWeak
|

Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
1258
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 15:12:23 -
[4] - Quote
Might take some time to collect the info, I'll gladly do it for a reasonable compensation of (since I'm interested aswell) just 600mil/hr it takes me to do so. 25% of the estimate is payable inadvance.
Since we're talking about roughly 350 kills you apparently whored onto, at 2 minutes a kill, that'd be a shy 1.9bil investment upfront on your part. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
12082
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 15:46:01 -
[5] - Quote
Valkin Mordirc wrote:Show us on the doll where the Tengu touched you. Riiiiiiiight here
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2042
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 07:47:59 -
[6] - Quote
Valkin Mordirc wrote:Show us on the doll where the Tengu touched you.
It didnt, it was off grid.
Awwwwww yiiiissss. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1374
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 14:14:51 -
[7] - Quote
I really think cancers like off grid boosting are why we are seeing numbers decline. Yes it will take some short term pain to get rid of the cancer but the long term decline will hopefully end, and even reverse.
BTW I listened to a podcast where ccp fozzie said they are making some headway on the technical issues of off grid boosters. He could not give us a date through.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Estella Osoka
Perkone Caldari State
800
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 15:22:54 -
[8] - Quote
Cearain wrote:I really think cancers like off grid boosting are why we are seeing numbers decline. Yes it will take some short term pain to get rid of the cancer but the long term decline will hopefully end, and even reverse.
BTW I listened to a podcast where ccp fozzie said they are making some headway on the technical issues of off grid boosters. He could not give us a date through.
Really? Off grid boosting is why people are leaving? You don't think it could possibly be because of nerf to capital ship movement (jump fatigue)? Or maybe all the new changes to null sov?  |

Switch Savage
The Tuskers The Tuskers Co.
193
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 15:45:55 -
[9] - Quote
I often see people complain about off grid boosters. Sadly the vast majority of these people are simply picking engagements that they would lose even if the opponent was not using warfare links. Not saying that's the case here but always something to keep in mind. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1374
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 16:20:56 -
[10] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:Cearain wrote:I really think cancers like off grid boosting are why we are seeing numbers decline. Yes it will take some short term pain to get rid of the cancer but the long term decline will hopefully end, and even reverse.
BTW I listened to a podcast where ccp fozzie said they are making some headway on the technical issues of off grid boosters. He could not give us a date through. Really? Off grid boosting is why people are leaving? You don't think it could possibly be because of nerf to capital ship movement (jump fatigue)? Or maybe all the new changes to null sov? 
I think there are many reasons why people are leaving and yes one of them is the horrible mechanic of off grid boosting. I can't really speak to the null sec changes. Null sec sov has never been of interest to me and I am not entirely sure what drives those players.
I can certainly speak for myself and say that as a mainly solo pilot ogb is a major reason I no longer pvp. Based on the feedback ccp has received over ogbs over the years I am sure lots of people feel the same way I do.
Switch Savage wrote:I often see people complain about off grid boosters. Sadly the vast majority of these people are simply picking engagements that they would lose even if the opponent was not using warfare links. Not saying that's the case here but always something to keep in mind.
It's difficult to understand what you are saying. Hundreds of players have complained about off grid boosts and I don't even follow allot of eve media sites. Here is one assembly hall request to put them on grid that received 130 upvotes which makes it one of the most upvoted proposals that is yet to be implemented.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=10444
Have you examined the killboards of all these players and determined that the vast majority take bad fights?
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Arla Sarain
660
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 16:47:44 -
[11] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:Really? Off grid boosting is why people are leaving? You don't think it could possibly be because of nerf to capital ship movement (jump fatigue)? Or maybe all the new changes to null sov?  How many people have access to capital ships, and how many people have the ability to go and PvP and then end up on the wrong side of OGBs?
There are certain individuals who find capital changes oppressive, but I somehow doubt that all the new, relatively new and some slightly more casual players (casual enough to not bother with alts) find the capital movement changes a factor worth leaving the game for. Because it just does not concern them.
The first most intuitive thing one can do in this game is undock and go pew pew. Not looking forward to going through the headache of getting even a small gang together, managing who flies what ship and all the other relevant roadbumps to setting up a fleet. The simplest thing anyone can do is just grab a ship and go.
With these things in mind, how in the fudge do you conclude that the introduction of fatigue is a large driver for players choosing not to stay? Are all the cry posts (what, 10 of them or something?) such a convincing sample? I mean sure it can be argued this way for links too, but far more people are affected on far more occasions by not having a flat out stat boost that introduce dramatic consequences to combat, as opposed to being affected fatigue, which is remote.
Furthermore, you can't ignore the people who don't post on the forums. It is only logical to believe that there are simply far fewer people with access to anything fatigue-involved. Bloody mind boggling when people claim fatigue is killing the game. The reality is that fatigue is a hit to an investment - it affects people who have put the time to get carriers/jumpfreighters/titans/blops/etc. It doesn't stop them from playing. It is upsetting, I can sympathise with that, but it is hardly game breaking.
Links on the other hand introduce a barrier. You can argue all you want that it doesn't stop anyone from playing, and refering to all the "2-week rifter tackling" youtube videos all you want. On the face of it, it is simply not convincing for the majority to look at ships going 6k m/s at a minimum, tackling from ranges that a majority of weapons cannot project to, and say "yeah, I'd like to participate in this form of entertainment. This is reasonable. I am also enthusiastic about bringing a niche module, fitted to a niche ship, to play a niche gameplay pillar (scanning) to counter what my enemy is doing. This is going to be fun".
Nope, get real. |

Estella Osoka
Perkone Caldari State
800
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 18:14:52 -
[12] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Estella Osoka wrote:Really? Off grid boosting is why people are leaving? You don't think it could possibly be because of nerf to capital ship movement (jump fatigue)? Or maybe all the new changes to null sov?  How many people have access to capital ships, and how many people have the ability to go and PvP and then end up on the wrong side of OGBs?
I'll focus on the main part of your mindless drivel.
1. While EVE is a pvp-centric game, the majority of people are either in highsec or nullsec; and while any day one newbie can fit a ship and go off and pvp, they normally don't.
2. OGBs are not so effing prevalent that they would drive people away from the game.
3. Flying a Capitol Ship does not take all that long to skill for now. In fact, skilling for a Jump Freighter is rather quick now, and are very useful. Oh, did I mention that that the publicized fights non-EVE players will often hear about will be the big capitol ship battles. Not that little 4 vs. 7 frig battle you just had in Kedama. People get into EVE because they want to fly the big ships.
Get over yourself, OGBs are not the main reason people quit. If I had to say anything is the main reason people quit, it would be those people who get their mining barge ganked because they fail to do some research about this game. |

Arla Sarain
661
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 19:13:55 -
[13] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:Arla Sarain wrote:Estella Osoka wrote:Really? Off grid boosting is why people are leaving? You don't think it could possibly be because of nerf to capital ship movement (jump fatigue)? Or maybe all the new changes to null sov?  How many people have access to capital ships, and how many people have the ability to go and PvP and then end up on the wrong side of OGBs? I'll focus on the main part of your mindless drivel. 1. While EVE is a pvp-centric game, the majority of people are either in highsec or nullsec; and while any day one newbie can fit a ship and go off and pvp, they normally don't. 2. OGBs are not so effing prevalent that they would drive people away from the game. 3. Flying a Capitol Ship does not take all that long to skill for now. In fact, skilling for a Jump Freighter is rather quick now, and are very useful. Oh, did I mention that that the publicized fights non-EVE players will often hear about will be the big capitol ship battles. Not that little 4 vs. 7 frig battle you just had in Kedama. People get into EVE because they want to fly the big ships. Get over yourself, OGBs are not the main reason people quit. If I had to say anything is the main reason people quit, it would be those people who get their mining barge ganked because they fail to do some research about this game. I didn't say or imply that OGB is the main reason why people leave. I said Jump-Fatigue is trivial in comparison to OGB because it affects so few people directly. That it's the culprit for fewer capital fights - maybe. Except there are capital fights happening daily.
Also capital fights are only arguably the main focus of the EVE publications - the thrill is just as much, if not more, about the scale and the number of people involved and the real money equivalent of the stuff destroyed that catches the attention. To claim that everyone who hears about EVE from this media ends up looking forward to a year long train to participate in those fights in those same big ships is unreasonably positive of the players' interest and attention time span.
Meanwhile, how is any of this related to the relatively fast skilling into a Jump Freighter? Does everyone rush to play EVE so that they could hop into a Jump Freighter "rather quickly" and up participate in these big fights with their freighters? 
So whilst the 4-7 frig fight in Kedama isn't what most players will hear about, it's what a majority will participate in with an out-of-the-box or slightly higher-SP character.
Wanting an environment that is healthy moment-to-moment to actually play in instead of a game where everyone waits to get pinged for the spontaneous capital fight is bad? I suppose opinions are just that - opinions. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1519
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 19:24:46 -
[14] - Quote
I think you will find that the vast majority of players sit in station most of the day or are not logged on but are waiting for a ping while they wonder down lanes or whatever other games they are playing.
The low concurrent log on numbers could be somewhat explained by lots of players blobbing up into larger entities that are basically CTA based.
Saying that boosts are what is causing newer players to not stick with EVE is being very selective with the facts. Do some people quit because they get the impression that EVE is unfair? Im sure they do. Have newbs been quitting EVE in droves with EVE retention numbers being ludicrously low for its entire existence separate from the proliferation of OGB? i think you will find they have.
The drop in numbers really does seem to be as a result of a final straw scenario for lots of older players regarding jump and SOV. Remember when one bittervet quits, thats usually 2-4 characters that no longer log on.
You cant just explain away low new player retention by pointing fingers at the OGBoogyman when new player retention has always been very low. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1375
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 19:47:34 -
[15] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:
I'll focus on the main part of your mindless drivel.
Her post was not mindless or drivel. But your posting this is a big reason why people consider eve -o forums to be a waste of time.
Estella Osoka wrote: 1. While EVE is a pvp-centric game, the majority of people are either in highsec or nullsec; and while any day one newbie can fit a ship and go off and pvp, they normally don't.
A large percent of the people in high sec are alts of people who pvp in low sec. If the low sec pvper stops those alts in high sec disappear.
Estella Osoka wrote: 2. OGBs are not so effing prevalent that they would drive people away from the game.
I'm not sure what game you are playing but it is not that uncommon to see more off grid tengus on dscan than actual combat ships. Look at the killboards of those using links and you will see how many people are effected by links.
There are several reasons that ogb drive players away. Not only is it god mode but it tends to be a very disheartening kill. It used to be that by and large the kiting ship had about a 14k cushion from the brawling ship. This lead to some very fun play where the brawling ship might have a shot at slingshoting the kiting ship even if the brawler only had an ab. Links broke that very fundamental game play. With links the kiting ship has such a huge cushion it can fly in, there is simply no hope for a brawling ship.
You will just die this horrible slow death. Even if you have an active tank that can take the trickle of damage you can't go anywhere. Its just a matter of who will bring in friends or who has more time to waste. Before links brawlers would get caught and killed by kiters but there was always some hope of trying to get a slingshot so an actual struggle happened. Now there is no fight at all, might as well eject.
This was enough for me and plenty of other people to decide to watch more tv with their spouse instead of logging in. What that meant is not only was I no longer there but people who remained there would no longer get fights with me. And I would no longer get fights with others who are more inclined to do something else with their free time other than get caught by some lame ship that is horrendously overpowered. This tends to snowball and before you know it not only is low sec becoming empty but you also don't see those alts logging into high sec either. Because the whole point of the high sec alt was to support the low sec pvp which is not happening for that person anymore.
Estella Osoka wrote: 3. Flying a Capitol Ship does not take all that long to skill for now. In fact, skilling for a Jump Freighter is rather quick now, and are very useful. Oh, did I mention that that the publicized fights non-EVE players will often hear about will be the big capitol ship battles. Not that little 4 vs. 7 frig battle you just had in Kedama. People get into EVE because they want to fly the big ships.
Its funny you picked jump freighters as an example of capitol ships. Whether people get into eve to fly the big ships might depend on their age. I think allot more people sub because they like the small scale pvp rather than the tidi blob pvp. But again this is hard to say for sure. Again I can just speak for myself and say I would certainly be more likely to pvp if ogb was fixed. When we consider the trickle down chilling effect this has on people going to low sec to do solo or micro gang pvp it might even be one of the main reasons eve is doing so poorly now.
And its not just people who don't use ogb. Even people who use those alts might eventually figure out what a tool they have become. They pay to have an extra account so they can bring that ogb crutch with them everywhere they go. Even they likely will decide the game isn't so fun anymore and they might also decide they would rather watch tv with their spouse.
They are obviously a horrible mechanic. If you doubt it go to some other mmo game that doesn't have something like this. And recomend that if people pay for an extra account they should get lots of extra powers. See what the reaction is.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1375
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 20:04:15 -
[16] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Saying that boosts are what is causing newer players to not stick with EVE is being very selective with the facts. Do some people quit because they get the impression that EVE is unfair? Im sure they do. Have newbs been quitting EVE in droves with EVE retention numbers being ludicrously low for its entire existence separate from the proliferation of OGB? i think you will find they have.....
The drop in numbers really does seem to be as a result of a final straw scenario for lots of older players regarding jump and SOV. Remember when one bittervet quits, thats usually 2-4 characters that no longer log on.
You cant just explain away low new player retention by pointing fingers at the OGBoogyman when new player retention has always been very low.
I don't claim that most new players quit because of ogb. They most likely quit for a variety of other reasons and always have. But lots of eve players are pretty bright and don't appreciate being played by ccp. ccp forcing them to pay for an extra account in order to get these massive bonuses is really pretty hard to swallow. And yes when new players see that if they want to really be competitive at pvp they will need to get an alt account in a tengu I am sure that is disheartening.
When CCP fozzie posted the off grid re-balance that really was no re-balance at all I think many players started to lose hope that they really were committed to fixing this problem. The off grid boosting just continued to proliferate and this combined with whatever else bothered people lead to long time players unsubbing. This meant less content and less content leads to even more people unsubbing etc.
As far as null sec my hunch is it had to do with risk adverse leadership that first brought about the problem. BOB wasn't a problem on many levels but they did just bring huge fights for the heck of it. And they would make headlines in the NY times. It wasn't that ccp changed the mechanics that lead to the blue doughnut. It was that goons became dominant and their leadership was extremely risk adverse.
I think allot of pilots sort of held on hoping that null sec changes would somehow invigorate null sec. Now that they see what the changes are they realize ccp does not have some silver bullet that can change the risk adverse leadership they are giving up hope. Its not necessarily that the changes are bad it's just that the changes can't accomplish what they were hoping for.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1519
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 20:56:08 -
[17] - Quote
Yet i literally dont know a single person that has quit or taken a break because of boosts. I dont even know anyone who viewed boosts as a contributing factor to their inactivity. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1375
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 21:41:10 -
[18] - Quote
Cearain wrote: I can certainly speak for myself and say that as a mainly solo pilot ogb is a major reason I no longer pvp.
Cearain wrote: [OGB] was enough for me and plenty of other people to decide to watch more tv with their spouse instead of logging in.
Cearain wrote: ... Again I can just speak for myself and say I would certainly be more likely to pvp if ogb was fixed.
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Yet i literally dont know a single person that has quit or taken a break because of boosts. I dont even know anyone who viewed boosts as a contributing factor to their inactivity.
It is interesting that you post that in a thread where I told you it was a large contributing cause of my inactivity. If ccp said all boosts had to be on grid I would pvp much more often. Hopefully they will do that before there is no one left online to pvp with.
I highly doubt I am alone. Take a look at the thread I linked (and there were several others.) I bet you will find many of the people who were asking ccp to do away with ogb are no longer active.
Of course you and ccp can ignore the reasons players give for leaving the game. Perhaps you think they are lying or mistaken about their own motivations to play this game or do something else.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1519
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 21:43:05 -
[19] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Far be it for me to question cerains motivations but i get the impression he likes to blame things for his shortcomings and OGB are a convenient target. That while he may have quit PvP due to lack of compelling (self-generated) content or burnout, he blames OGB as the single factor to further his vapid rhetoric and make himself feel better about being a quitter.
It think i covered that. Even giving you the benefit of the doubt, one account is just an anecdote. |

Estella Osoka
Perkone Caldari State
800
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 21:48:44 -
[20] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Estella Osoka wrote:Arla Sarain wrote:Estella Osoka wrote:Really? Off grid boosting is why people are leaving? You don't think it could possibly be because of nerf to capital ship movement (jump fatigue)? Or maybe all the new changes to null sov?  How many people have access to capital ships, and how many people have the ability to go and PvP and then end up on the wrong side of OGBs? I'll focus on the main part of your mindless drivel. 1. While EVE is a pvp-centric game, the majority of people are either in highsec or nullsec; and while any day one newbie can fit a ship and go off and pvp, they normally don't. 2. OGBs are not so effing prevalent that they would drive people away from the game. 3. Flying a Capitol Ship does not take all that long to skill for now. In fact, skilling for a Jump Freighter is rather quick now, and are very useful. Oh, did I mention that that the publicized fights non-EVE players will often hear about will be the big capitol ship battles. Not that little 4 vs. 7 frig battle you just had in Kedama. People get into EVE because they want to fly the big ships. Get over yourself, OGBs are not the main reason people quit. If I had to say anything is the main reason people quit, it would be those people who get their mining barge ganked because they fail to do some research about this game. I didn't say or imply that OGB is the main reason why people leave. I said Jump-Fatigue is trivial in comparison to OGB because it affects so few people directly. That it's the culprit for fewer capital fights - maybe. Except there are capital fights happening daily. Also capital fights are only arguably the main focus of the EVE publications - the thrill is just as much, if not more, about the scale and the number of people involved and the real money equivalent of the stuff destroyed that catches the attention. To claim that everyone who hears about EVE from this media ends up looking forward to a year long train to participate in those fights in those same big ships is unreasonably positive of the players' interest and attention time span. Meanwhile, how is any of this related to the relatively fast skilling into a Jump Freighter? Does everyone rush to play EVE so that they could hop into a Jump Freighter "rather quickly" and participate in these big fights with their freighters?  So whilst the 4-7 frig fight in Kedama isn't what most players will hear about, it's what a majority will participate in with an out-of-the-box or slightly higher-SP character. Wanting an environment that is healthy to actually play in moment-to-moment, instead of a game where everyone waits to get pinged for the spontaneous capital fight, is bad? I suppose opinions are just that - opinions.
Jump Freighters factor in due to logistics. Lowsec and nullsec markets are crap. Having a JF makes it a lot easier to resupply yourself.
|

Estella Osoka
Perkone Caldari State
802
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 21:53:02 -
[21] - Quote
So we can all agree that OGBs are not the be-all end-all of why people are leaving the game? |

Reah Darknorth
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 22:07:52 -
[22] - Quote
The fact that a player can just buy an alt account with a T3 and significantly boost his PvP ability with said alt is really a bit insulting.
If that wasn't bad enough, fleet assist links also give The Blob even bigger advantages than they already have. As if it wasn't hard enough to fight in 1vX situations, they also have an absurd force multiplier on their side in the form of a 6-link Tengu.
Putting fleet links on grid is not enough. They should simply be removed from this game.
I mean picture that for a second. An Eve Online without fleet links. No more dragging the Loki alt around with you everywhere you go. No more 70km warp disrupting Garmurs. It would be so much cleaner, so much simpler. It would be so much more fair. |

Arla Sarain
661
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 22:19:09 -
[23] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:
Jump Freighters factor in due to logistics. Lowsec and nullsec markets are crap. Having a JF makes it a lot easier to resupply yourself.
Ok so, bar stating the obvious, what are you trying to say? People read about capital fights in EVE and turn up full of ambitions to have their own JF, having glanced at the somewhat shorter training time?
They don't correlate. Saying that players join EVE because they want to fly big ships and stating JFs are a short train, I'm sorry, I don't follow.
I admit, Crosi is right, I was selective with the facts. I shouldn't have used the term "newer" players either.
There was a pic floating around on imgur, showing the amount of accounts most players have. A lot of players have just 1 account and only slightly less have 2. I won't pretend to know how many of those are links. I feel like a number won't really describe the issue - links have proliferated enough that we see having them as a standard. A lot of people are behind the standard.
What, are we dumb? Bad at the game? How many people do you think would enjoy the idea that chasing alt count is becoming the epitome of this game? The commonly proposed counter, being probes, is still either delegated to alt duty, or a game of whack-a-mole for the person who actually brings a 200+ CPU module with them.
Estella Osoka wrote:So we can all agree that OGBs are not the be-all end-all of why people are leaving the game? Yes. But it's ignorant to say that it's not a factor. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1519
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 22:30:51 -
[24] - Quote
Reah Darknorth wrote:The fact that a player can just buy an alt account with a T3 and significantly boost his PvP ability with said alt is really a bit insulting.
If that wasn't bad enough, fleet assist links also give The Blob even bigger advantages than they already have. As if it wasn't hard enough to fight in 1vX situations, they also have an absurd force multiplier on their side in the form of a 6-link Tengu.
Putting fleet links on grid is not enough. They should simply be removed from this game.
I mean picture that for a second. An Eve Online without fleet links. No more dragging the Loki alt around with you everywhere you go. No more 70km warp disrupting Garmurs. It would be so much cleaner, so much simpler. It would be so much more fair.
You can buy an account to do anything. Someone still had to train it, and that someone used to have the same advantage. Also, not that it is simple to buy an account. they do cost many billion isk after all. ive never bought an account, but the fix to people buying accounts would be to stop people from being able to buy accounts. Im neutral on that matter. i dont care who is behind the screen, i only see the pixels in space.
As for links giving the blob an advantage, ask brave newbies how much their links helped then when i engaged their blob with a single garmur and killed about 8 (out of 30ish) dudes in the time it took them to complete a plex.
One thing i can agree on, removing boosts completely is better than putting boosts on grid. That actually would only help the blob. Though apart from people saying boosts are unfair i dont see a valid reason to do so. EVE is unfair by design after all. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1375
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 22:40:07 -
[25] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Far be it for me to question cerains motivations but i get the impression he likes to blame things for his shortcomings and OGB are a convenient target. That while he may have quit PvP due to lack of compelling (self-generated) content or burnout, he blames OGB as the single factor to further his vapid rhetoric and make himself feel better about being a quitter. It think i covered that. Even giving you the benefit of the doubt, one account is just an anecdote.
OGB is a huge reason for my lack of interest in pvp. It is a big reason why I stopped spending nights doing solo pvp and chose to spend more time watching tv with my wife at night.
Of course lack of content is another reason but again the two are tied together. If a game fails to fix a horrible mechanic where you pay for an extra account to give your main god-mode there will be fewer players. That leads to less content. So you can't seperate out the bad mechanics from the lack of content.
I am not sure that I am blaming any of my shortcomings on ogb. I do say it causes me to not to pvp in eve as often. Do you think my decision to not log in to eve online is a shortcoming? I guess you do since you call me a "quitter."
You know EVE is not the begin all and end all. You are not doing things with your life that you could be doing if you were not logging into eve with your multiple alt accounts. I am not saying eve is a bad way to spend your time. I am just saying if you ever get tired of lugging your alt accounts with you to every system, and decide to step back from eve for a while, I won't say you are a quitter.
As far as an anecdote. Look at the threads and see if the people who complained about this bad mechanic are still active. I have noticed many of the solo pvpers are inactive.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1519
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 22:46:33 -
[26] - Quote
Wow what a terrible post.
BTW, im spending exactly the same amount of time playing eve regardless of how many alts i have running lol.
And i didnt say people dont complain about how eve is unfair. I just said that i dont personally know of anyone who has actually cited boosts as any sort of reason for them quitting. |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
1375
|
Posted - 2015.09.29 00:12:47 -
[27] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:So we can all agree that OGBs are not the be-all end-all of why people are leaving the game?
It is more complicated than that. If ccp did fix this problem I almost certainly would give solo pvp another try. There are other things that CCP could do that would make me give solo pvp a try again as well.
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Wow what a terrible post.
I didn't actually say anything you attribute to me. So your opinion of my post has limitted value.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Reah Darknorth
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2015.09.29 01:45:51 -
[28] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
You can buy an account to do anything. Someone still had to train it, and that someone used to have the same advantage. Also, not that it is simple to buy an account. they do cost many billion isk after all. ive never bought an account, but the fix to people buying accounts would be to stop people from being able to buy accounts. Im neutral on that matter. i dont care who is behind the screen, i only see the pixels in space.
As for links giving the blob an advantage, ask brave newbies how much their links helped then when i engaged their blob with a single garmur and killed about 8 (out of 30ish) dudes in the time it took them to complete a plex.
One thing i can agree on, removing boosts completely is better than putting boosts on grid. That actually would only help the blob. Though apart from people saying boosts are unfair i dont see a valid reason to do so. EVE is unfair by design after all.
I wasn't trying to hate on the ability to buy accounts. I just used that as a random example of how T3 links can work. You could also just create the account and pay for the training time yourself. It costs money either way, which is part of the problem I think. It's a bit too P2W. I'm fine with account buying as well, I just really dislike fleet links.
Fleet links give anybody who uses them an advantage. That 30 man blob was better off with links than without them. I mean, they were probably "bad" pilots in T1 frigates so they probably were at a severe disadvantage regardless of the links, but the links certainly helped more than they hindered and it's really as simple as that.
As for Eve being unfair by design, that's really a poor reason to keep such a broken mechanic in the game. Eve is not really unfair, anyway. Everyone starts out the same in this game, do they not? Everyone works their way up. It's unfair in the same sense that real life is unfair - some are better at it than others, the strong prey on the weak, etc. But this is still no reason to keep such an absurdly unfair mechanic as AFK alt-PvP-God-Mode is it? Links boost your ship to the next level, and they do so from the safety of an AFK cloaky off grid alt. They're ridiculous and they should be removed from game completely. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1519
|
Posted - 2015.09.29 03:02:34 -
[29] - Quote
By that standard my PvP account is also P2W. I paid for it, and i win. If you are going to define P2W so loosely, any game that a good player pays for is P2W, and the same game bought by a bad player is not P2W.
It makes no sense. |

Demerius Xenocratus
Rapid Withdrawal
675
|
Posted - 2015.09.29 03:04:05 -
[30] - Quote
Confirming links are cancer. And highly prevalent. If you try to solo/small gang in Placid or Black Rise without them, you're gonna have a bad time.
Having to pay a second account to compete is ******* stupid. The whole links-centric nano kite meta is ******* stupid. It will be a glorious day for EVE when CCP kills that nonsense stone dead, and I will gleefully drink the tears of the elite pvp'ers who can't function without their pet Tengu.
Every serious solo pvp'er in Black Rise has an OGB alt, and every corp that's even remotely competent has a booster only almost 24/7. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |