EVE Search - Sticky:[December] Missile Disruptors and Tweaks to Missile Guidance Mod...

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[December] Missile Disruptors and Tweaks to Missile Guidance Mod...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 4 post(s)

CCP Fozzie C C P C C P Alliance 13323	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:05:46 - [1] - Quote Hey folks! If you've followed our development over the past few years you'll know that the idea of tracking disruptors for missiles has been bouncing around for a long time. Defender missiles are a very poor counter (that should be completely repurposed rather than tweaked) and the inability to impact missiles has always been a major problem for Amarrian Weapon Disruption ships. We think that adding Missile Disruptors will create some interesting new fitting options, especially for ships with bonuses to weapon disruption. We're now planning on releasing these new modules in our December release, and we're ready to start getting your feedback! These disruptors would be seperate modules within the same group as Tracking Disruptors. They will use the same skills and get the same bonuses as Tracking Disurptors (so for example a Pilgrim would automatically get bonuses for these modules). Pilots will be able to choose what combo of missile and tracking disruptors to fit on their ships, based on what they expect to face. We're planning on introducing T1, T2 and named versions with faction options being considered. We expect that the stats will need extensive tweaking and playtesting, but here's what we're working with at the moment: At the same time, we're planning on making a slight buff pass on the Missile Guidance modules that were introduced in Aegis. Their range bonuses don't need any more improvements, but we are currently planning on buffing their explosion radius and explosion velocity bonuses by ~10%. We'd then observe how that change is received on TQ and decide if we want to go farther or not. We're really interested in your feedback and we have plenty of time to get these properly adjusted before release. These changes are currently planned for our December release. Keep an eye out for an announcement later today from CCP Seagull who will be going over some more stuff coming soon, as well as more announcements in the weeks leading up to EVE Vegas. Let us know what you think! Game Designer \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/

Yadaryon Vondawn Alius Itineris Virtus 30	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:12:20 - [2] - Quote -will edit-
TrouserDeagle Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 1124	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:12:22 - [3] - Quote :o
Baali Tekitsu AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse 919	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:12:46 - [4] - Quote I have been a fan of the idea for a long time and this is great. RATE LIKE SUBSCRIBE
Frostys Virpio KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation 2295	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:15:01 - [5] - Quote Precision script and range script I assume? So a precision script would remove 30% explosion velocity AND increase explosion radium by 30%?
Selto Black Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters Ocularis Inferno 3	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:15:03 - [6] - Quote Those that fight garmurs and orthoruses in lowsec thank you.
DaJokr Hard Knocks Inc. Hard Knocks Citizens 27	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:18:24 - [7] - Quote This means you're adding remote missile guidance enhancers to match all the other modules and balance it out, correct?
Krell Kroenen The Devil's Shadow 260	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:19:24 - [8] - Quote A nice addition to the game and a nice tweak to the existing guidance mods as well.
Kiki Abraxas Cap's R Us 3	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:19:30 - [9] - Quote why not fix things that are broken such as sov mechanics :) and then go back to adding new ****
Metal Icarus Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad. 744	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:19:44 - [10] - Quote yay more ewar! \o/

Laetitia Nzero Southern Cross Incorporated Flying Dangerous 243	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:19:50 - [11] - Quote This is cool. Now nobody will laugh when I bring my Sentinel :D
O'nira Litla Sundlaugin 72	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:20:01 - [12] - Quote Any chance of faction Missile Computers and enhancers?
Steve Ronuken Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM 5587	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:21:13 - [13] - Quote Kiki Abraxas wrote: why not fix things that are broken such as sov mechanics :) and then go back to adding new **** Sometimes I think that people just don't understand that not all development is created equal. Woo! CSM X! Fuzzwork Enterprises Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Genghis Tron Boom Squad 21	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:23:01 - [14] - Quote Kiki Abraxas wrote: why not fix things that are broken such as sov mechanics :) and then go back to adding new **** I agree with this! Since you are literally the only person working at CCP, Fozzie, you really ought to stick on one project and stop multi-tasking. Put down that slice of pizza! You can't eat and dev at the same time. Do one thing. I'm paying for this game, listen to meeee! Also, love the idea. This has been much needed for quite some time. Keep up the great work CCP! BOOM SHAKALAKA
Baali Tekitsu AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse 919	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:24:24 - [15] - Quote By the way, are they going to affect fighter bombers like tracking disruptors affect turret drones? RATE LIKE SUBSCRIBE
Thanatos Marathon Black Fox Marauders 521	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:24:28 - [16] - Quote Without having done any math yet because mathishard, looks good! +1
Treya Neverette Sinful Dick's Goathouse of Fun 5	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:24:55 - [17] - Quote Please make defender missiles anti-drone missiles.
Ripard Teg Snuff Box Snuffed Out 1076	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:29:22 - [18] - Quote If they're going to use the same skills/bonuses as Tracking Disruptors, why not just use missile disruption scripts for the existing Tracking Disruptors instead of a new module? As always ( ), my thinking here is geared toward small gang, who while roaming are not going to know if they're going to be facing turret ships or missile ships until they're facing them. aka Jester, who apparently was once Deemed Worthy To Wield The Banhammer to good effect.
Frostys Virpio KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation 2295	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:31:05 - [19] - Quote Ripard Teg wrote: If they're going to use the same skills/bonuses as Tracking Disruptors, why not just use missile disruption scripts for the existing Tracking Disruptors instead of a new module? As always ( ), my thinking here is geared toward small gang, who while roaming are not going to know if they're going to be facing turret ships or missile ships until they're facing them. INB4 mobile depot.
TrouserDeagle Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 1124	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:34:13 - [20] - Quote can we rename tracking disruptors to turret disruptors or something while we're at it? 'optimal range tracking disruptors' is so dumb.

Ransu Asanari AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse 361	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:34:31 - [21] - Quote I've expected to see these for a while, and generally I'm in favor of them. I do wonder why you've chosen to give this new EWAR ability to Amarr however - yes it fits alongside Tracking Disruptors, but Amarr already get Tracking Disruption and Energy Neutralizers as a primary and secondary EWAR on their class ships. So now they're going to have Missile Disruption as well? Caldari ships only get ECM and... ECM. That's it - they have no secondary EWAR capability on their Electronic Attack Ships, or Recon Ships. Unless you are also planning on introducing a drone counter EWAR system, would it not make more sense to give this ability to Caldari ships? I understand that may take more work to revamp all of the ships, but if an ECM rebalance is in the works anyway, logically it would make sense to give drone and missile EWAR to Caldari ships. I've outlined a bit more detail on this here, and I believe Corbexx may have sent it your way: https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/3itkns/rogue_drone_battleship_grasping_robot_arms_have/cuke0v4
The Slayer GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 275	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:35:46 - [22] - Quote Kiki Abraxas wrote: why not fix things that are broken such as sov mechanics :) and then go back to adding new ** If only there were multiple teams who could work on multiple things at multiple times, you multiple goddam ****.
Hendrink Collie Blood Oath Foundation Adaptation. 70	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:39:15 - [23] - Quote Exciting stuff. Should help against those angsty orths.
Ben Ishikela 64	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:39:30 - [24] - Quote Awesome! --- Now add some AoE effect to missile explosion, ( ... and work out the CONCORD problems ). Then they actually matter and are a difference to guns. I'd like the feeling/story of it. ...and btw would be a nice tool against nooby anchoring blobs. also nice to have gilas shooting their own drones. lol --- Remove JumpFreighters/CloakHauler/CloakTrick and make a new T2Freighter(mjd&LotsOfCargo&moreTank, but no JumpDrive). Because we need more opportunities for piracy, escorts and decentralised economy! ...also Convoys.
sytaqe violacea Circus of midnight 33	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:40:33 - [25] - Quote Do you have any plan to add bonus about this modules on any ship?
Keras Authion Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 197	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:42:51 - [26] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: At the same time, we're planning on making a slight buff pass on the Missile Guidance modules that were introduced in Aegis. Their range bonuses don't need any more improvements, but we are currently planning on buffing their explosion radius and explosion velocity bonuses by ~10%. We'd then observe how that change is received on TQ and decide if we want to go farther or not. Just to clarify, are you going to raise the stats by 10% (ie. 5% to 5.5%) of the current or to around total of 10% bonus? This post was rated "C" for capsuleer.
h4kun4 Heeresversuchsanstalt The Bastion 32	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:43:55 - [27] - Quote Some Missing Modules: Missile Guidance Link => Tracking Link Drone Tracking Disruptor => As a contra for the Omnidirectional Tracking Link Some of my Corpies are very concerned Missile Doctrines will become useless, i hope you guys dont screw up the balancing in the first place. For example is the damage application of T2 HAMs on Cruisers a bit weak already, you won't hit much with a disruptor module.
Scatim Helicon GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3331	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:44:30 - [28] - Quote Missile disrupting scripts for the existing tracking disruptors would seem to be a much neater solution than a whole new range of modules, is there a reason why you've taken this route instead? Post on the Eve-o forums with a Goonswarm Federation character that drinking bleach is bad for you, and 20 forum warriors will hospitalise themselves trying to prove you wrong.
Mia Markaya Unlimited Blade Works. 0	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:44:58 - [29] - Quote What if you just changed Tracking Disruptors to Disruptors and gave them 4 scripts? 2 for turrets, 2 for missiles. Damps will still be better overall imo.
TrouserDeagle Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 1124	Posted - 2015.10.02 17:49:41 - [30] - Quote Mia Markaya wrote: What if you just changed Tracking Disruptors to "Weapon Disruptor" and gave them 4 scripts? 2 for turrets, 2 for missiles. Damps will still be better overall imo, if you can't lock, you can't DPS at all. the way it is is good. if it's all in one module I can just show up in my 5 tracking disruptor curse and shut everyone down except drones. if you make me choose the number of modules of each type to fit, well, it's sort of like racial ecm rather than just making multis as powerful as racials. tracking disruptors are plenty good already.



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.