| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Trollin
   |
Posted - 2006.12.26 18:39:00 -
[31]
Synapse is right.
---------------------------------------------------
A word to the wise ain't necessary, its the stupid ones that need the advice |
Lady Loom
Red Mercury Industries
Legiones Astartes
|
Posted - 2006.12.26 18:39:00 -
[32]
 Originally by: Synapse X
Yes. And a 30k seller gets 40k in his wallet.
that makes no freaking sense...
[[ power corrupts, absolute power is kind of neat ]] |
Mei Jiang
|
Posted - 2006.12.26 18:41:00 -
[33]
sure it does, it's what happens in the stock exchange and in commodities markets around the world.
|
Lady Loom
Red Mercury Industries
Legiones Astartes
|
Posted - 2006.12.26 18:46:00 -
[34]
makes no sense, period (the real world doesn't either...)
care to explain the following?
"the order disappeared from the seller character's wallet and the transaction log of the buyer listed the intended seller's name in the transaction that cost him ISK, without the seller actually getting the money"
[[ power corrupts, absolute power is kind of neat ]] |
Venkul Mul
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.12.26 18:54:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Kylania
Originally by: Lady Loom
Seriously, you people need to learn to read - if he's putting up a sell order, and his buddy buys that particular order (distinguishable by funky price, eg.), you know, you can CHOOSE what sell order you buy.
You do not understand how the market works. You are not able to pick and choose which Sell Order you wish to buy. It doesn't matter which Sell Order you happened to rclick on and say to buy, when you "buy" an item it will fill that order with the lowest priced Sell Order on the market. The market is not useable as a method to selectively transfer ISK.
I can confirm, some time I have been the surprised seller, even petitioned it fearing it could cause problem as using a bug.
GM confirmed that the lowest sell order is the one that get the isk, indipendently by what is the sell order selected.
|
Red Reaver
|
Posted - 2006.12.26 19:30:00 -
[36]
Out of curiosity, could the OP put a hauling contract up with the 7m as collateral and then have the other guy just never deliver it?
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |