Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.19 18:10:57 -
[1] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:I can definitley see why the leaders of PL, goons, and others are so fiercely in favour of this.
Exactly what I thought as soon as Elise Randolph went on the charm offensive on reddit and various goons started backing this on the forum.
|

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.19 21:06:50 -
[2] - Quote
$1000 Jeans  |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.19 21:13:47 -
[3] - Quote
Primary This Rifter wrote:ColdBeauty wrote:Moac Tor wrote:I can definitley see why the leaders of PL, goons, and others are so fiercely in favour of this. Exactly what I thought as soon as Elise Randolph went on the charm offensive on reddit and various goons started backing this on the forum. They can go **** themselves. They're just as bad as all the miners who whined about barge HP until CCP finally caved and buffed it.

|

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.19 21:31:47 -
[4] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:I'm sure they have a plan, yes, but I'm not quite so willing to suggest input on fair pricing shouldn't be provided. I'd hate for this to go the vanity route price wise, invalidating much of the good it could do and reinforcing the "cash grab" accusation crowd.
indeed - if they price TSEs like they price skins... oh boy. expect to see 1 plex (3500 aur) extractors. skin prices are, imo, absurdly high considering what they are.
There's still more than enough ways for CCP to c*** this up so badly that even the people who are totally behind the idea will be rioting in Jita/Amarr over the price of the extractors 
Lest we forget ...
GÇ£Assume for a short while that you are wearing a pair of $1,000 jeans from some exclusive Japanese boutique shop. Why would you want to wear a pair of $1,000 jeans when you can get perfectly similar jeans for under $50? What do other people think about you when they see you wearing them? For some you will look like the sad culmination of vainness while others will admire you and think you are the coolest thing since sliced bread. Whichever it is, it is clear that by wearing clothes you are expressing yourself and that the price is one of the many dimensions that clothes possess to do that in addition to style and fit. You donGÇÖt need to buy expensive clothes. In fact you donGÇÖt need to buy any clothes. Whatever you choose to do reflects what you are and what you want others to think you are.
We will gradually introduce items at other price points, definitely lower and probably higher than whatGÇÿs in the store today. We hope you enjoy them and are as passionate about them as you are of the current items that are for sale.GÇ¥ |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
5
|
Posted - 2015.10.20 13:25:49 -
[5] - Quote
Rawthorm wrote: Pay to Access.
Hardly better tho really is it...
|

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
5
|
Posted - 2015.10.20 14:23:50 -
[6] - Quote
gascanu wrote:
you ignoring the fact that when most of us started, cruiser/bc/bs/whaterver lvl 5 was not a requirement to join a basic alliance op; yes the game evolved, and we evolved with it; while we spent those months training all those ships, it was done in years, and we had fun doing so; when i started i was joining in a t1 fitted tempest and no one was telling me to just dock up; the fact is that, back in the day you could join main fleets allot faster, and there where 2-3 main doctrines; now? oh you need to train 3 months to get that tengu lvl 5; 3 months later-OH CRAP CCP just nerfed tengus, you need to train to proteus, so good luck with training 3 more months and so on; this is just one ex, i know you can have fun in some smaller ships, but there is a point where flying a t1 frig all the time waiting to skiil up just isn't fun anymore
I agree with what you are saying about doctrines and the bar being raised over the years, I just don't get how buying SPs is supposed to help newbros who can't afford to buy them, if they spend their time grinding isk to buy the skills, will they have enough time to grind the isk for the ships ? Will this just herd them all into large nullsec entities with SRPs ?
It seems that a lot of people get left out with this idea. |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
5
|
Posted - 2015.10.20 14:42:22 -
[7] - Quote
gascanu wrote:
herding them all to nullsec entities with srp is much better than herding them out of the game; and that is a mart thing to do, for a new player, instead of just playing solo mission running in high sec; you want to stay "safe"? play in empire solo, but train at normal speed; you want to advance at a faster speed? join a player corporation, be it nul sec/low sec/incursion that can help you make isk>advance faster, and that will be a win-win situation:good corps get more active players, new players get to train a bit faster, and reach that "confort" zone
So basically you are saying "let goons win or the game dies" 
|

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
7
|
Posted - 2015.10.20 21:05:29 -
[8] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:If CCP is looking for more of a cash grab, removing SP would be a better idea. Then new players can engage in the fantasy that buying a battleship makes them powerful (said battleship funded by PLEX sale), and gradually learn that bigger is not always better, and that there's more to combat in EVE than bringing the biggest gun.
Another option for the cash grab is to have more reasons to buy PLEX (e.g.: special offers with custom skins or limited edition ships, or whatever).
Doubtful it would work out like this. All those vet accounts subbed with no real intent to play regularly but not wanting to miss out on training would suddenly have the SP addiction removed as a reason to stay subbed. Add to that the likely outrage this thread evidences for any change to the SP system and "invalidating years of training" and you'll probably kill off any notion of an increase in subs or plex consumption. Edit: Maybe my experience is highly atypical but I never actually made the line strait for BSs. They were a tool of necessity for PvE due to being actually better for that purpose. And even then there was no hurry either, getting 500m for the ship + fitting was trivial with all the time I spent before even injecting my first BS skill. My main from 2007 can't fly BS or use any large guns, never been an issue |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.21 14:49:58 -
[9] - Quote
afkalt wrote: you think people are pissed now when a ship they've skilled into is nerfed? Wait until they bought their way into it  ?
Not empty quoting for truth and justice
|

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.21 14:57:19 -
[10] - Quote
Rawthorm wrote:I'd also like to bring up that I strongly doubt alliances will suddenly fund skill injection for people on any meaningful scale. If they were willing to do this, we'd already have seen alliances bulk buying characters for their members.
Depends if T3s get a nerfbat, I can see SPRPs joining SRPs in big alliances. Also, they don't need to be handing out 50m SP chars to line members to have a use for TSPs, unwatchlisted cynoalts etc don't need that many SPs |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
12
|
Posted - 2015.10.22 18:00:46 -
[11] - Quote
Niko Lorenzio wrote:Just listened to Jeff Raiders latest podcast and Gorski Car was there taking about sp proposal. It gave me a slightly better understanding where he's coming from. He's thinking that overcoming some initial training barriers will allow newcomers to get involved with the 'cool' stuff in eve.
I would like to respectfully disagree. I have interacted with new players ALOT. At the risk of sounding arrogant I'm going to say that I have helped to get dozens if not hundreds of new players realize the beauty of eve and get hooked. Sometimes they were as young as few of days old. Big nullsec alliances want people in specific doctrines because they can't overcome their static bureaucratic nature. This is a problem that needs to be worked out internally by players instead of with a change that is forced on the entirety of eve
I and I'm sure most of the people opposed to this proposal want to help new players. We just don't think pressuring those players into paying money for skills is going to help that and it sends the wrong message. I keep hearing people say what are you worried about, sp doesn't mean **** in eve, its about skillz. Then why are we reinforcing this false belief by giving them an option to buy sp? Personally I don't give a damn if we give new players a bunch of unallocated sp. Do it through non tradable means as a reward for completing certain story arcs. Make it once per account and they should take a certain amount of time to complete to limit its abuse with alts.
This community has many intelligent, creative players and devs. If team size matters gives a good and clear idea of goals they want to achieve we can come up with solutions that everyone can be happy with. The dev blog seems a bit disingenuous and needs clarification for the reason behind this proposal.
The more I look at it the more I think this is a "bowing to nullsec blobs" move combined with a cash grab that will be foisted on the rest of us under the guise of helping new bros. Helping relieve them of their money basically.
|

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
14
|
Posted - 2015.10.24 15:44:08 -
[12] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:I agree with the change. CCP is right with the SP penalty, without it only the rich veterans would use this.
This feature should be aimed towards new players and low SP characters.
Distinguishing between new players and new characters started by rich vets is impossible, rich vets can pay with vast amounts of isk, new players will pay with R/L cash, to think that vets are not going to abuse this system and push the price up is naive in the extreme.
|

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
15
|
Posted - 2015.10.24 22:58:47 -
[13] - Quote
Dror wrote:Don ZOLA wrote:CCP probably thinks they will attract them with new features, but they do not realize side effects. Can you list any problems that aren't.. veterans getting the option of alts
it plausibly being ineffective
?
* Rich Veterans pushing the price out of reach of new guys because of diminishing returns causing them to buy up vast amounts of TSPs.
* New players that can't afford R/L cash and unable to effectively grind enough isk for TSPs seeing their rich in R/L peers advance to more fun stuff more quickly.
* Renters being asked to stump up SPs by nullsec powerblocks.
* FOTM becoming even more of an issue as TSPs allow instant access to whatever new cancerous crap everyone wants to fly.
* T3s becoming even more ubiquitous and obsoleting more ships as TSPs will render SP penalty for ship loss redundant.
Just a couple off top of my head |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
15
|
Posted - 2015.10.25 01:09:27 -
[14] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:ColdBeauty wrote:Dror wrote:Don ZOLA wrote:CCP probably thinks they will attract them with new features, but they do not realize side effects. Can you list any problems that aren't.. veterans getting the option of alts
it plausibly being ineffective
? * Rich Veterans pushing the price out of reach of new guys because of diminishing returns causing them to buy up vast amounts of TSPs. * New players that can't afford R/L cash and unable to effectively grind enough isk for TSPs seeing their rich in R/L peers advance to more fun stuff more quickly. * Renters being asked to stump up SPs by nullsec powerblocks. * FOTM becoming even more of an issue as TSPs allow instant access to whatever new cancerous crap everyone wants to fly. * T3s becoming even more ubiquitous and obsoleting more ships as TSPs will render SP penalty for ship loss redundant. Just a couple off top of my head You'll always be able to make your own for 1/4 PLEX + extractors. There is literally no way prices will raise above that. More SP doesn't mean more fun. What is peers, since almost everybody starts on their own? Also, who cares? Renters pay ISK or SP, it will be the exact same thing since they'll be interchangable. Why is FOTM an issue? Ships are cancerous when they're unbalenced, not when a number of people choose to fly them. LOL at SP loss actually limiting T3 use. Look, you're free to not like this proposal, but what you write are sloppy predictions that simply will not happen. Wait and see if you don't believe me.
These are not predictions, they are possible outcomes, and it seems you are the one using a crystal ball...
Quote:that simply will not happen
You cannot possibly state that with confidence, to do so is at best naivety, at worst complete hubris. |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
18
|
Posted - 2015.10.25 18:32:07 -
[15] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote: . No way SP prices will rise above 1/4 PLEX + Extractor, this is simple market logic
Fairly sure PLEX price is not static and there are daily threads created bemoaning it's continual rise. It's more than possible that rising plex price will prevent new players from buying SPs unless they use R/L cash. So back to the possibility of SPs only being available to rich in game vets and rich in R/L newbs. |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
18
|
Posted - 2015.10.25 18:36:34 -
[16] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote: . FOTM is a balance issue, sames as T3s. SP makes no difference. Certain ships being significantly more effective than others is a problem because it limits variety and interesting gameplay. The solution is balancing the ships, not having SP or ISK barriers (slightly) limiting player choice of ships
See this is more strawman twaddle, I'm not arguing that SP barrier should be solution to FOTM, I am just pointing out the completely reasonable point that instant access would exacerbate FOTM proliferation... and it would.
Try to debate me on the point I actually make and not the one you think you can rebutt.
Edit : The point you make about SPs being like other tradeable commodity and it not making a difference to renters/nullsec landlords is a fair one and I will concede that. |

ColdBeauty
oooh ponies
18
|
Posted - 2015.10.25 18:41:17 -
[17] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote: The proposal creates the concept of SP farms, and allows veteran players with lots of spare SP or ISK to setup these farms to milk as much ISK as they can out of it. Also this is PASSIVE income which is something that CCP has been trying to remove from the game, and worst off it is passive income with absolutely no effort required to set it up or defend.
This is so true is bears repeating.
|
|
|