MaidMarion
FarCry Inc
Imperium Alliance
   |
Posted - 2006.12.31 13:36:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Butter Dog
Edited by: Butter Dog on 31/12/2006 11:17:41
I'll leave you with a quick thread recap to flame about while I'm out partying for a few days, bascially my main claims and what the result is;
* MC refused to engage AAA in offensive operations, full stop
Result: Fact. They refused to engage in that one fight, thats true. They also called off all offensive operations with AAA in the picture, even when most of AAA logged in and left the next day. This led directly to....
* MC did not complete the full contract with ISS
Result: Fact. With AAA in the picture, taking the other outposts, even with overwhelming numbers in our favour and the choice of two different systems to siege (AAA can only log out in one of them), they walked away.
* ISS was dissapointed with MC's performance in relation to the overall contract
Result: Fact, as proven by the PM from count expressing his dissapointment in them. No matter how MC spin it, they failed to complete all objectives (for whatever reason), and their employer was left high and dry with only one outpost out of three, and a resurgent IAC to deal with.
* MC refuse difficult contracts, or walk away from tough fights
Result: Fact. The best source of this was not just the AAA example, or the total cakewalk in F4 in which MC deployed 20% of the numbers but claimed 100% of the credit, but their own ex-leader stating they DID used to accept easy contracts, and shy away from real challenges.
* There was no employer for the first Prohibition contract
Result: Stalemate. I have given my source, and provided my evidence. The onus is now on MC to provide proof, which they refuse to do. However, an ex-MC leader has stated that he would not put this past them.
And that sums it up pretty well I think.
And don't forget, I only revealed my source for a couple of those points because he decided to come on this thread and lie about me. That blew up in his face pretty good.
Oh... but according to MC, I'm the one who is discredited 
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
First, these are my opinions, not those of Imperium
BD :MC refused to engage AAA in offensive operations, full stop
So what, MC is a merc corp who work on very detailed plan. If something big enough comes into the picture to change the outcome of that plan - its time for a new plan.
They dont make money by suiciding cap fleets.
BD : * MC did not complete the full contract with ISS
So you say - maybe there was contract for one with option for others ? hence only the payment of the first system.
BD: * ISS was dissapointed with MC's performance in relation to the overall contract
No - that was one mans opinion as to why MC didnt suicide a fleet - someone who probably knows little of pvp. Think ill take Seleene as an FC over you or count.
BD : * MC refuse difficult contracts, or walk away from tough fights
However you percieve it - MC is a business entity, they are there to make money, and they are the best at what they do.
Part of their business plan is (tada) PROMOTION !!! Yes ! a business CAN have an image !!
Thank you for pointing out the obvious. (and making it sound like some back room conspiracy)
|