| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
1498
   |
Posted - 2015.11.03 13:00:44 -
[1] - Quote
"A character with a criminal flag in a high-sec system is no longer able to board/switch ships whilst in space."
Welp.
You hyperdunking ninja's are going to need alts. Lots of alts.
Good luck.
*sighs*
Everything in EVE is a trap.
And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.
Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
|
Thermal Damage
Refit For Thermal
Overheat.
103
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 13:09:20 -
[2] - Quote
Pretty neat
I was found guilty of Nitshe by the CoCaP
|
Leto Thule
Everywhere and Terrible
4084
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 14:01:15 -
[3] - Quote
Next up:
"Unable to attack illegal target while in highsec"
Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
|
Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
145
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 14:11:14 -
[4] - Quote
Fixing an exploit is not a nerf.
Run and Gun Mercenary Corps looking for work. Pras Phil.
|
Mortlake
Devils Rejects 666
849
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 14:11:59 -
[5] - Quote
It appears they went ahead and nerfed the map too, even after all the complaints.
It now has -50% to ergonomics.
Eve is dying. |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
3516
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 14:50:02 -
[6] - Quote
Samwise Everquest wrote:Fixing an exploit is not a nerf.
Except they said it wasn't an exploit. Level of usage doesn't change that (and even if it did, useage was incredibly low in this case). This is a nerf just like all the other nerfs, because one more nerf and highsec will finally be "balanced".
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
CODE. forum - everyone's welcome (no shiptoasters)
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
25605
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 15:07:46 -
[7] - Quote
Samwise Everquest wrote:Fixing an exploit is not a nerf. Despite the nerf which makes it a non viable ganking strategy, it's
still listed as explicitly not an exploit by CCP as of the time of this post.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Samwise Everquest
Because ISK
145
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 15:21:22 -
[8] - Quote
Semantics.
Run and Gun Mercenary Corps looking for work. Pras Phil.
|
Lady Ayeipsia
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
969
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 15:52:47 -
[9] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Samwise Everquest wrote:Fixing an exploit is not a nerf. Despite the nerf which makes it a non viable ganking strategy, it's still listed as explicitly not an exploit by CCP as of the time of this post.
And if you track down the post where CCP declared it not an exploit, did they also not say future game mechanic changes may render the tactic obslete or unusable? I seen to recall CCP making that claim but could be wrong. Given some of the other suggested changes such as not being able to refit with a weapon timer, the change to the bowhead fits the logic of being stuck in the same ship you started the fight with unless you win, lose, or wait out your timer.
Will the trick be missed? Yes.
Will it be a source for back in my day stories? Yes.
Does it require people to adapt and find new tricks? Yes.
Does it mean people may lose a playstyle? Yes.
Has that happened before? Yes.
Will it happen again? Yes.
Time to harden up and move on? Yes. |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
25606
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 16:09:49 -
[10] - Quote
Lady Ayeipsia wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Samwise Everquest wrote:Fixing an exploit is not a nerf. Despite the nerf which makes it a non viable ganking strategy, it's still listed as explicitly not an exploit by CCP as of the time of this post. And if you track down the post where CCP declared it not an exploit, did they also not say future game mechanic changes may render the tactic obslete or unusable? I seen to recall CCP making that claim but could be wrong. Given some of the other suggested changes such as not being able to refit with a weapon timer, the change to the bowhead fits the logic of being stuck in the same ship you started the fight with unless you win, lose, or wait out your timer. Will the trick be missed? Yes. Will it be a source for back in my day stories? Yes. Does it require people to adapt and find new tricks? Yes. Does it mean people may lose a playstyle? Yes. Has that happened before? Yes. Will it happen again? Yes. Time to harden up and move on? Yes. Oh agreed, CCP did make it clear in the original thread that they may look into it in the future, and they have done so.
I was merely pointing out to Mr Everquest that it wasn't an exploit in the past, and apparently, despite now being mechanically impossible, still isn't.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
|
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1805
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 16:12:20 -
[11] - Quote
Finally, it's safe to AFK that freighter through Uedama again!
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1541
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 18:03:35 -
[12] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Finally, it's safe to AFK that freighter through Uedama again!
We're getting closer. Just one more nerf (to bumping) and we'll be there. I promise.
PS - I'm as excited about this as you are!! Exciting times!! |
Toxic Yaken
Amarr Squad
26
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 19:01:21 -
[13] - Quote
Rip hyperdunking, I have faith in CODE. and all other gankers to ensure freighters keep dying.
Highsec Spaceboat Pirate
Overly Neglected Blog: http://shiniestneckonsafari.blogspot.ca
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14832
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 21:02:14 -
[14] - Quote
Samwise Everquest wrote:Semantics.
That's not semantics, you're just a ******.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Noragen Neirfallas
Rabble Inc.
Rabble Alliance
2243
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 21:23:16 -
[15] - Quote
Here is my real issue with this. If it was a great issue why not try making an attempt at education first through say a scope video?
Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment
Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode favourite ISD
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14833
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 21:30:51 -
[16] - Quote
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:Here is my real issue with this. If it was a great issue why not try making an attempt at education first through say a scope video?
Because expecting carebears to actually play the game at their keyboards is apparently asking too much.
Which is apparently the player demographic that CCP wants to cultivate. 
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
StonerPhReaK
Herb Men
303
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 22:36:35 -
[17] - Quote
Though Ive never hyperdunked, Ive always thought it was super clever of the guy who thought it up. It brought forth a good many posts and burned away tons of time on the ole'porcelin throne with reads. Some players even tried to come up with counters to it. I thought it was the perfect form of emergent gameplay and even showed some sign of players banding together against a common enemy outside of incursions. NPSI fleets are filling the void somewhat but its still a far cry from getting people who do not know each other to form up and do something together. In a multiplayer game. Online. This coulda been it. Its sad to see it go instead of being built upon. Sad indeed.
Signature Removal in Progress, Estimated time of completion? Neva
|
Mevath Sagald
Natural Selection II
Phylogenesis
0
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 23:09:41 -
[18] - Quote
R.I.P. Hyperdunking.
It was fun, interesting way killing people, as well as meeting them. Looking forward to other adventures.
For anyone interested in videos of Hyperdunking, they can be found on my YouTube. I still have more unedited material, it will get edited and uploaded.
StonerPhReaK wrote:Though Ive never hyperdunked, Ive always thought it was super clever of the guy who thought it up.
The guy who created it was Globby. |
Tyyler DURden
Mordechai and Sons Distribution Co.
139
|
Posted - 2015.11.03 23:17:26 -
[19] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Samwise Everquest wrote:Semantics. That's not semantics, you're just a ******.
And it's pot and kettle time in c&p.
Tyyler DURden says "use soap"
|
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
808
|
Posted - 2015.11.04 04:34:19 -
[20] - Quote
All you had to do to counter a hyperdunk was bring a logi.
It was that simple.
Hyperdunking is very slow damage over time that is incredibly easy to interrupt.
Good thing it's gone, now CODE. has no competition and have regained monopoly on ganking 
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
|
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7193
|
Posted - 2015.11.04 05:44:15 -
[21] - Quote
To those who find this troubling... wait there was an update today? Meh. I was travelling all day. I got send to Detroit.
Where was I.... oh yes.
If you find this troubling, I suggest you stop treating Eve like a single player game and actually make some friends and perform your ganking with them. I hear the goons and CODE. do this.
(Sorry, couldn't resist).
Edit: they were very easy to stop for even a single AG, but a long setup for the ganker. I will always insist that CCP did this more to save gankers from the sort of Rube Goldberg methods that are more apt to give the game even more of an autist air.
And as far as freighters being "safer" - no. Freighters were AFKin through the gank pipeline before, during, and will continue to do so. I have convo'ed a lot of ganked freighter pilots and they don't care. They are so deep in ISK they factor in the loss. And believe me, it's frustrating trying to save an AFK freighter because the pilot can't respond to any assistance. Even I have to admit that running billions AFK means you deserve to get ganked. If it were up to me, the game would not have such a thing as autopilot.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Zakks
Zakks Shop
10
|
Posted - 2015.11.04 08:33:59 -
[22] - Quote
Englebert Hyperdunk has a fitting song for this
Couldn't resist, the name has always been amusing |
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
439
|
Posted - 2015.11.04 10:56:20 -
[23] - Quote
As far as i understood, the future of hisec is still in the making.
Still under the premise that New Eden is a harsh dark place.
Meaning, that CCP will keep up possibilities to kill each others.
Most likely still without consent of both parties.
However the same rules that gankers tell their victims will apply to them.
Sologanking (aka hyperdunking) is removed.
Targets to big for one guy, need group actions.
Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|
Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists
SpaceMonkey's Alliance
6923
|
Posted - 2015.11.04 13:38:39 -
[24] - Quote
Glorious
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
|
Mevath Sagald
Natural Selection II
Phylogenesis
0
|
Posted - 2015.11.04 15:17:38 -
[25] - Quote
La Rynx wrote:Meaning, that CCP will keep up possibilities to kill each others.
Most likely still without consent of both parties. Consent to PvP |
Intar Medris
Hellbound Turkeys
Alliance of Abandoned Cybernetic Rejects
237
|
Posted - 2015.11.04 17:32:35 -
[26] - Quote
I don't know who is crying harder. The hyper dunkers or the guy that's going to lose all that money on the excess freighters he has been selling because supposedly ganking them is impossible without hyper dunking.
God forbid you have to go back to the old fashioned way of bringing plenty of alphaNados or BS. Oh the humanity ya need to more people to blow up a sitting duck. Question is who cries more the gankers or the carebears? My vote is on the gankers. Because you guys create megathreads full of rage everytime CCP nerfs or buffs something. Don't believe me. Just browse through the the C&P forums.
I try to be nice and mind my business just shooting lasers at rocks. There is just way too many asshats in New Eden for that to happen.
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
1828
|
Posted - 2015.11.05 11:52:56 -
[27] - Quote
Intar Medris wrote:I don't know who is crying harder. The hyper dunkers or the guy that's going to lose all that money on the excess freighters he has been selling because supposedly ganking them is impossible without hyper dunking. God forbid you have to go back to the old fashioned way of bringing plenty of alphaNados or BS. Oh the humanity ya need to more people to blow up a sitting duck. Question is who cries more the gankers or the carebears? My vote is on the gankers. Because you guys create megathreads full of rage everytime CCP nerfs or buffs something. Don't believe me. Just browse through the the C&P forums.
Yeah I know right? Because all the tears and threads over the last year which made CCP actually change the game mechanics do not count, because.. because.., well they just don't count!
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|
Miss Iniquitous
Razing Demolitions
4
|
Posted - 2015.11.05 13:11:18 -
[28] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Intar Medris wrote:I don't know who is crying harder. The hyper dunkers or the guy that's going to lose all that money on the excess freighters he has been selling because supposedly ganking them is impossible without hyper dunking. God forbid you have to go back to the old fashioned way of bringing plenty of alphaNados or BS. Oh the humanity ya need to more people to blow up a sitting duck. Question is who cries more the gankers or the carebears? My vote is on the gankers. Because you guys create megathreads full of rage everytime CCP nerfs or buffs something. Don't believe me. Just browse through the the C&P forums. Yeah I know right? Because all the tears and threads over the last year which made CCP actually change the game mechanics do not count, because.. because.., well they just don't count!
What changes are you referring to?
|
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
442
|
Posted - 2015.11.05 14:56:51 -
[29] - Quote
Mevath Sagald wrote:La Rynx wrote:Meaning, that CCP will keep up possibilities to kill each others.
Most likely still without consent of both parties. Consent to PvP
*Pats Mevaths Head*
Yes that is, what i was talking about!
Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
|
Tengu Grib
Black Hydra Consortium.
1458
|
Posted - 2015.11.05 17:57:06 -
[30] - Quote
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:Here is my real issue with this. If it was a great issue why not try making an attempt at education first through say a scope video?
Because educating people who willfully ignore the universe around them simply doesn't work.
Special thanks to Carlvagio for being a cool bro and financing fun activities.
StonerPhReak> Being an adult sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |