| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Buxaroo
Constructive Influence
   |
Posted - 2007.01.08 05:01:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Master OlavPancrazio
This is most saddening indeed. Rise are like goons, and it will be most saddening that they aren't in my general pvping area anymore.
Funny. I have looked at your own killboards, and RISE seem to have a very high effeciency against you guys. And if I remember, RISE helped you in dealing with the goons, and then you repay their help with this backstabbing behavior....but that's typical of D2 it seems.
![]() |
Buxaroo
Constructive Influence
|
Posted - 2007.01.09 01:32:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Kweel Nakashyn
*bump*
Strange how Bob and Rise are trying to hijack the topic. Rise starts allready to act as a buckler...
cu in neighborhood, Rise.
o.0
Wow
0.o
![]() |
Buxaroo
Constructive Influence
|
Posted - 2007.01.10 12:04:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Buxaroo on 10/01/2007 12:03:33
Edited by: Buxaroo on 10/01/2007 12:02:51
Originally by: venimous
As an outsider, id assume that since bob and d2 are going to war and rise are between d2 and bob then it stands to reason they were approched by both sides and asked to join them against the other.
It also stands to reason that both bob and d2 would not accept rise staying nutral after all if ur war zones in the middle of rise teritory bob and d2 arnt just gonna watch as rise carry about there business.
So stuck between a rock and a hard place what would you choose?
I understand your logic, but for one thing: I don't think D2 came to RISE for friendship. D2 used RISE to kill goonies and then they backstab them with the YouWhat thing. And then set RISE to neutral. That was pretty stupid of D2. They could have had a very strong ally in RISE, or in their minds eye a meatshield if you want to get cynical.
If you knew the history of RISE and SGHQ and REZ, you would never have guessed they would side with BoB. But that just goes to show you how totaly ****ty D2 must have been in their relationship to RISE. D2 are nothing but backstabbers. Period.
![]() |
Buxaroo
Constructive Influence
|
Posted - 2007.01.26 10:41:00 -
[4]
Originally by: NATMav
Originally by: welsh wizard
Edited by: welsh wizard on 20/01/2007 13:25:00
Aye but this game is about fighting not submitting. Whether or not you make shed loads of isk as a caretaker alliance is besides the point, you can make isk anywhere.
As it stands you're just contributing to the future stagnation of 0.0. What is it now? 5 or 6 subdued regions being run by caretakers? It works theres no doubt about it, and BoB play this game to win, but why help them achieve what will ultimately be their victory, not yours?
Wouldn't it be more fun to fight the overwhelming force?
It's hard to see past the flames and posts full of stuff like "slaves on a leesh" and what not but I believe the sensible people opposed to BoB make some very good points. This pacification of 0.0 isn't fun for anyone but them.
Anyway this isn't going to change your minds but to whom ever it may concern, for future reference think about tomorrow a bit more, not just today.
Quoted in case the tinfoil hattery proves to be true.
NATMav, if you agree with the parts about "pacification" of 0.0, then what difference does it make if it is BoB, D2, or LV? All alliances in 0.0 do the same thing (well the big ones), and D2 is the mother of all pacification with all the NAPs etc going on up north. And as someone in BoB said in another thread, there's always room for "rebel" alliances 
![]() |
| |
|