EVE Search - Ship bouncing with different masses

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Ship bouncing with different masses

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Teckos Pech The Executives Executive Outcomes 3745	Posted - 2015.11.21 19:11:07 - [31] - Quote FT Diomedes wrote: Iain Cariaba wrote: Zimmer Jones wrote: ed* obviously not with mosquitos You obviously haven't seen the mosquitos where I live. They've been know to carry off small to medium sized dogs. Do you live in Maine? Minnesota? Or Louisiana? Too bad your proposal did not call for using mosquitoes in that way... would finally be a good use for them besides yellow fever, malaria, and other lovely tropical diseases. Aww man, what do you have against dogs? Upgrading Local to Eliminate All AFK Influence So Local Chat vanished, now what?
Ima Wreckyou The Conference Elite CODE. 1903	Posted - 2015.11.22 03:41:01 - [32] - Quote I met the OP and his corp friends recently in game and they assured my that bumps are not bothering them at all or have any impact on their mining business. They had however some trouble with fitting ships in general. the Code ALWAYS wins Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
Commander Riggs Geier GmbH The Craftsmen 3	Posted - 2015.11.27 00:12:43 - [33] - Quote Ima... go back to School. Quote "The physics of the bumps are implemented correctly" .... get your Toyota and kick a 40 tons Truck of the road ... and tell me again
Rawketsled Generic Corp Name 337	Posted - 2015.11.27 00:35:46 - [34] - Quote Commander Riggs wrote: Ima... go back to School. Quote "The physics of the bumps are implemented correctly" .... get your Toyota and kick a 40 tons Truck of the road ... and tell me again Elastic Collisions are a thing.
Ima Wreckyou The Conference Elite CODE. 1913	Posted - 2015.11.27 06:40:33 - [35] - Quote Commander Riggs wrote: Ima... go back to School. Quote "The physics of the bumps are implemented correctly" .... get your Toyota and kick a 40 tons Truck of the road ... and tell me again Physics is done with math and not with gut feelings. Feel free to calculate it by yourself how much a Machariel + MWD (mass increase) at 2000 m/s would move a Freighter. You can also do the math for a Stabber + MWD at 3000 m/s against your Orca and show us how wrong EVE is. And now tell us how you tried to bump my stabber with your frigate and how it did not work. Also tell us how it did not work for your friend as well. The fittings for the frigs are on my killboard for reference. the Code ALWAYS wins Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
Ageanal Olerie Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:49:20 - [36] - Quote Ima Wreckyou wrote: The physics of the bumps are implemented correctly, you just forgot that the AB and MWD increase the mass of a ship. Also why cry in a new thread when there is already another one about the same topic? Big surprise. High-sec mining, hauling, and industrial ganking filth don't want the bumping mechanics to be changed.
Zimmer Jones Aliastra Gallente Federation 415	Posted - 2015.11.29 17:57:37 - [37] - Quote Oh yeah, don't forget us hauler and mining filth that don't want it change either. You speak for yourself, not for all of us. The cake is not a lie. Unfortunately, the fork is a parallel construction.
Ageanal Olerie Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2015.11.29 18:35:07 - [38] - Quote Zimmer Jones wrote: Oh yeah, don't forget us hauler and mining filth that don't want it change either. You speak for yourself, not for all of us. LOLOLOLOLOLOL. Sure Zimmer Jones. Says the guy who's been defending gankers for years.
Zimmer Jones Aliastra Gallente Federation 418	Posted - 2015.11.29 19:20:40 - [39] - Quote Yep, I champion their gameplay because their failure( the gankers and gankees) makes me feel better about my success. What have you lost that makes you so bitter? How did you lose it? Why shouldn't I support their efforts to part a fool from his/her isk? I adapt, avoid and prosper. I use the risk to increase my enjoyment, and i fully believe that candy taken from diaper wearing adults is fair game. Passive schadenfreude best schadenfreude. The cake is not a lie. Unfortunately, the fork is a parallel construction.
Ageanal Olerie Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2015.11.29 20:02:11 - [40] - Quote Zimmer Jones wrote: Yep, I champion their gameplay because their failure( the gankers and gankees) makes me feel better about my success. What have you lost that makes you so bitter? How did you lose it? Why shouldn't I support their efforts to part a fool from his/her isk? I adapt, avoid and prosper. I use the risk to increase my enjoyment, and i fully believe that candy taken from diaper wearing adults is fair game. Passive schadenfreude best schadenfreude. I've never actually been ganked. Though I don't think much of the people who do it, particularly as a career. In any event, I for one have also long found the bumping mechanic to be one of the most stupid things about EVE. Particularly when a small ship can bump a much larger one. Still you'd think an advanced space ship would be able to counterbalance any forces being applied to it against its desired heading, orientation, or direction of travel.
Shallanna Yassavi Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 44	Posted - 2015.11.30 03:42:05 - [41] - Quote If both ships in a bump have shields at zero, it should be crunch time, because that would be consistent with lore about how shields work (and how they wouldn't when they've failed). Outside of that, the mechanic is just fine. A signature :o
Teckos Pech The Executives Executive Outcomes 3842	Posted - 2015.11.30 04:41:03 - [42] - Quote Ageanal Olerie wrote: Zimmer Jones wrote: Yep, I champion their gameplay because their failure( the gankers and gankees) makes me feel better about my success. What have you lost that makes you so bitter? How did you lose it? Why shouldn't I support their efforts to part a fool from his/her isk? I adapt, avoid and prosper. I use the risk to increase my enjoyment, and i fully believe that candy taken from diaper wearing adults is fair game. Passive schadenfreude best schadenfreude. I've never actually been ganked. Though I don't think much of the people who do it, particularly as a career. In any event, I for one have also long found the bumping mechanic to be one of the most stupid things about EVE. Particularly when a small ship can bump a much larger one. Still you'd think an advanced space ship would be able to counterbalance any forces being applied to it against its desired heading, orientation, or direction of travel. Well, what is stupid is that you don't understand bumping. A small ship will have a hard time bumping a much larger ship without at least a MWD....which also increases the mass of the ship doing the bumping (scroll down to the part that says mass addition; so for something like a taranis an increase of 500,000 kg would be a one third increase in ship mass) and even then it wont be terribly effective against a ship like a freighter. Maybe you should read a bit more on how the game mechanics work. As for bumping, it is totally fine, IMO. You don't take damage when you slam into other objects in game. And if you find yourself getting bumped in preparation of a gank, you screwed up several times over....you deserve what is coming, IMO. HTFU and fly smarter. Upgrading Local to Eliminate All AFK Influence So Local Chat vanished, now what?

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.