| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Torath
   |
Posted - 2003.12.02 16:15:00 -
[31]
Thanks for the info on can strength, so it looks like they are not so secure after all. But I still think a little tougher than they should be.
And to all the other who flamed me, thanks for the entertainment and I hope you will be as helpful next time I have a question!!
You want it I got it....erm unless I sold it, then some one else has it!?! :/
|
WhiteDwarf
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 16:16:00 -
[32]
"And to all the other who flamed me, thanks for the entertainment and I hope you will be as helpful next time I have a question!!"
Anytime man, have fun griefing those cans!
"Trust No One" |
Torath
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 16:56:00 -
[33]
 Quote:
"And to all the other who flamed me, thanks for the entertainment and I hope you will be as helpful next time I have a question!!"
Anytime man, have fun griefing those cans!
So tell me dwarf boy where you mining so I can come and grief yours first?
You want it I got it....erm unless I sold it, then some one else has it!?! :/
|
WhiteDwarf
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 16:59:00 -
[34]
"So tell me dwarf boy where you mining so I can come and grief yours first?"
I don't use secure cans...
"Trust No One" |
Shock
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 18:39:00 -
[35]
Quote:
I can't believe Im reading this 
I remember months ago, lots of threads talking about secure cans. They were introduced because ppl would easily steal from standard jettisoned cans, or blow them up.
CCP came into play, and introduced them, syaing that "if you want to mine securely, se secure containers".
Now someone is asking to make them destructible, so they can keep their grief going, since ppl started to actually use the secure cans.
Funny isn't it 
If CCP had given the miners the right to retalliate instead of using indestructible cans there would have been both less complaining from the miners then and from the orethieves now.
Personnally I think this would have been the best solution, though I think secured cans are great but shouldn't be so tough.
---
soonÖ |
ZzeusS
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 19:52:00 -
[36]
Quote:
If CCP had given the miners the right to retalliate instead of using indestructible cans there would have been both less complaining from the miners then and from the orethieves now.
When you attack a secure can it registeres as hostile action against the player, does it not?
|
Braccas
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 20:55:00 -
[37]
Quote:
Quote:
If CCP had given the miners the right to retalliate instead of using indestructible cans there would have been both less complaining from the miners then and from the orethieves now.
When you attack a secure can it registeres as hostile action against the player, does it not?
Such is called Contraband Flagging and isn¦t yet on TQ nor on Chaos AFAIK.
|
cball
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 22:01:00 -
[38]
I want my ships plated with SCC's, then no one could beat me in a fight...
...fear the evil monkey in your hanger...
|
Jiraiya
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 23:36:00 -
[39]
With secure containers the lamers at least need guns..
Watching the low life ore thieves creep around in their bestowers before the sec tainers were introduced made me invest in a kestrel with torps and a alt 
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |