|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shock
   |
Posted - 2003.12.02 21:59:00 -
[1]
Sounds VEEEEERY nice!!!
Only will the bookmarks still work? And perhaps the warpspeed or indycargohold (biggest issue with travelling times) should be increased to balance the increase of time. IMHO the accelerating/decelerating is quite OK.
---
soonÖ |
Shock
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 22:07:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Shock on 02/12/2003 22:09:45
OK I smell the first exploit here.
Imagine when a group of ships want to free a JIP (I don't know if this is still an issue with the sentry guns at the gates though).
Normally they will first send in one or two 'shieldtanks' to do recon and draw fire and targetjams, after which the rest of the group jump in.
Ofcourse this is not that different except now they can all jump in all at once, see what's happening, who's there, have almost a mminute to discuss who'll be locking who, let the shieldtanks break their cloak, wait till the defenders attack them and then completely roll over them in an organized fashion.
Normally the defenders had the (huge) advantage, but this will, instead of making it even, completely flip the scale to the attackers IMHO.
---
soonÖ |
Shock
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 22:14:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Shock on 02/12/2003 22:15:32
 Quote:
20 km isn't really enough range to be able to effectively stop anything. 25-30 would be more realistic. If the invul is removed/reduced to <2secs, then it might not be a problem.
As for the haulers who think this will suck - try rigging for speed, rather than greed ;) My bestower can break 1km/s...
Indeed. If that masked time would also be used in an adapted fashion (ships is travelling at normal speed or something) then there would no longer be need for the nvul timer at gates and fields so we could rid of that monster as well.
In this case it's even bad, because the second someone breaks his cloak after having jumped in, the campers will have to be extremely quick to catch him before he goes into warp or MWD.
---
soonÖ |
Shock
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 22:47:00 -
[4]
Quote:
Unfortunately I can't check an existing bookmark of that type as I've never used bookmarks that way.
It's not that hard to make one right?
---
soonÖ |
|
|
| |
|